Cargando…

Why Word Learning is not Fast

Upon fast mapping, children rarely retain new words even over intervals as short as 5 min. In this study, we asked whether the memory process of encoding or consolidation is the bottleneck to retention. Forty-nine children, mean age 33 months, were exposed to eight 2- or-3-syllable nonce neighbors o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munro, Natalie, Baker, Elise, McGregor, Karla, Docking, Kimberly, Arculi, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3289981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393326
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00041
_version_ 1782224926021779456
author Munro, Natalie
Baker, Elise
McGregor, Karla
Docking, Kimberly
Arculi, Joanne
author_facet Munro, Natalie
Baker, Elise
McGregor, Karla
Docking, Kimberly
Arculi, Joanne
author_sort Munro, Natalie
collection PubMed
description Upon fast mapping, children rarely retain new words even over intervals as short as 5 min. In this study, we asked whether the memory process of encoding or consolidation is the bottleneck to retention. Forty-nine children, mean age 33 months, were exposed to eight 2- or-3-syllable nonce neighbors of words in their existing lexicons. Didactic training consisted of six exposures to each word in the context of its referent, an unfamiliar toy. Productions were elicited four times: immediately following the examiner’s model, and at 1-min-, 5-min-, and multiday retention intervals. At the final two intervals, the examiner said the first syllable and provided a beat gesture highlighting target word length in syllables as a cue following any erred production. The children were highly accurate at immediate posttest. Accuracy fell sharply over the 1-min retention interval and again after an additional 5 min. Performance then stabilized such that the 5-min and multiday posttests yielded comparable performance. Given this time course, we conclude that it was not the post-encoding process of consolidation but the process of encoding itself that presented the primary bottleneck to retention. Patterns of errors and responses to cueing upon error suggested that word forms were particularly vulnerable to partial decay during the time course of encoding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3289981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32899812012-03-05 Why Word Learning is not Fast Munro, Natalie Baker, Elise McGregor, Karla Docking, Kimberly Arculi, Joanne Front Psychol Psychology Upon fast mapping, children rarely retain new words even over intervals as short as 5 min. In this study, we asked whether the memory process of encoding or consolidation is the bottleneck to retention. Forty-nine children, mean age 33 months, were exposed to eight 2- or-3-syllable nonce neighbors of words in their existing lexicons. Didactic training consisted of six exposures to each word in the context of its referent, an unfamiliar toy. Productions were elicited four times: immediately following the examiner’s model, and at 1-min-, 5-min-, and multiday retention intervals. At the final two intervals, the examiner said the first syllable and provided a beat gesture highlighting target word length in syllables as a cue following any erred production. The children were highly accurate at immediate posttest. Accuracy fell sharply over the 1-min retention interval and again after an additional 5 min. Performance then stabilized such that the 5-min and multiday posttests yielded comparable performance. Given this time course, we conclude that it was not the post-encoding process of consolidation but the process of encoding itself that presented the primary bottleneck to retention. Patterns of errors and responses to cueing upon error suggested that word forms were particularly vulnerable to partial decay during the time course of encoding. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3289981/ /pubmed/22393326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00041 Text en Copyright © 2012 Munro, Baker, McGregor, Docking and Arculi. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Munro, Natalie
Baker, Elise
McGregor, Karla
Docking, Kimberly
Arculi, Joanne
Why Word Learning is not Fast
title Why Word Learning is not Fast
title_full Why Word Learning is not Fast
title_fullStr Why Word Learning is not Fast
title_full_unstemmed Why Word Learning is not Fast
title_short Why Word Learning is not Fast
title_sort why word learning is not fast
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3289981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393326
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00041
work_keys_str_mv AT munronatalie whywordlearningisnotfast
AT bakerelise whywordlearningisnotfast
AT mcgregorkarla whywordlearningisnotfast
AT dockingkimberly whywordlearningisnotfast
AT arculijoanne whywordlearningisnotfast