Cargando…

Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs

Various methods of reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks infer transcriptional regulatory interactions (TRIs) between strongly coexpressed gene pairs (as determined from microarray experiments measuring mRNA levels). Alternatively, however, the coexpression of two genes might imply that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ku, Wai Lim, Duggal, Geet, Li, Yuan, Girvan, Michelle, Ott, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031969
_version_ 1782225012034371584
author Ku, Wai Lim
Duggal, Geet
Li, Yuan
Girvan, Michelle
Ott, Edward
author_facet Ku, Wai Lim
Duggal, Geet
Li, Yuan
Girvan, Michelle
Ott, Edward
author_sort Ku, Wai Lim
collection PubMed
description Various methods of reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks infer transcriptional regulatory interactions (TRIs) between strongly coexpressed gene pairs (as determined from microarray experiments measuring mRNA levels). Alternatively, however, the coexpression of two genes might imply that they are coregulated by one or more transcription factors (TFs), and do not necessarily share a direct regulatory interaction. We explore whether and under what circumstances gene pairs with a high degree of coexpression are more likely to indicate TRIs, coregulation or both. Here we use established TRIs in combination with microarray expression data from both Escherichia coli (a prokaryote) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a eukaryote) to assess the accuracy of predictions of coregulated gene pairs and TRIs from coexpressed gene pairs. We find that coexpressed gene pairs are more likely to indicate coregulation than TRIs for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but the incidence of TRIs in highly coexpressed gene pairs is higher for Escherichia coli. The data processing inequality (DPI) has previously been applied for the inference of TRIs. We consider the case where a transcription factor gene is known to regulate two genes (one of which is a transcription factor gene) that are known not to regulate one another. According to the DPI, the non-interacting gene pairs should have the smallest mutual information among all pairs in the triplets. While this is sometimes the case for Escherichia coli, we find that it is almost always not the case for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This brings into question the usefulness of the DPI sometimes employed to infer TRIs from expression data. Finally, we observe that when a TF gene is known to regulate two other genes, it is rarely the case that one regulatory interaction is positively correlated and the other interaction is negatively correlated. Typically both are either positively or negatively correlated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3290541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32905412012-03-05 Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs Ku, Wai Lim Duggal, Geet Li, Yuan Girvan, Michelle Ott, Edward PLoS One Research Article Various methods of reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks infer transcriptional regulatory interactions (TRIs) between strongly coexpressed gene pairs (as determined from microarray experiments measuring mRNA levels). Alternatively, however, the coexpression of two genes might imply that they are coregulated by one or more transcription factors (TFs), and do not necessarily share a direct regulatory interaction. We explore whether and under what circumstances gene pairs with a high degree of coexpression are more likely to indicate TRIs, coregulation or both. Here we use established TRIs in combination with microarray expression data from both Escherichia coli (a prokaryote) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a eukaryote) to assess the accuracy of predictions of coregulated gene pairs and TRIs from coexpressed gene pairs. We find that coexpressed gene pairs are more likely to indicate coregulation than TRIs for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but the incidence of TRIs in highly coexpressed gene pairs is higher for Escherichia coli. The data processing inequality (DPI) has previously been applied for the inference of TRIs. We consider the case where a transcription factor gene is known to regulate two genes (one of which is a transcription factor gene) that are known not to regulate one another. According to the DPI, the non-interacting gene pairs should have the smallest mutual information among all pairs in the triplets. While this is sometimes the case for Escherichia coli, we find that it is almost always not the case for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This brings into question the usefulness of the DPI sometimes employed to infer TRIs from expression data. Finally, we observe that when a TF gene is known to regulate two other genes, it is rarely the case that one regulatory interaction is positively correlated and the other interaction is negatively correlated. Typically both are either positively or negatively correlated. Public Library of Science 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3290541/ /pubmed/22393375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031969 Text en Ku et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ku, Wai Lim
Duggal, Geet
Li, Yuan
Girvan, Michelle
Ott, Edward
Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs
title Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs
title_full Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs
title_fullStr Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs
title_short Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression: Signatures of Coregulation, the Data Processing Inequality, and Triplet Motifs
title_sort interpreting patterns of gene expression: signatures of coregulation, the data processing inequality, and triplet motifs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031969
work_keys_str_mv AT kuwailim interpretingpatternsofgeneexpressionsignaturesofcoregulationthedataprocessinginequalityandtripletmotifs
AT duggalgeet interpretingpatternsofgeneexpressionsignaturesofcoregulationthedataprocessinginequalityandtripletmotifs
AT liyuan interpretingpatternsofgeneexpressionsignaturesofcoregulationthedataprocessinginequalityandtripletmotifs
AT girvanmichelle interpretingpatternsofgeneexpressionsignaturesofcoregulationthedataprocessinginequalityandtripletmotifs
AT ottedward interpretingpatternsofgeneexpressionsignaturesofcoregulationthedataprocessinginequalityandtripletmotifs