Cargando…
Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling
The analysis of network evolution has been hampered by limited availability of protein interaction data for different organisms. In this study, we investigate evolutionary mechanisms in Src Homology 3 (SH3) domain and kinase interaction networks using high-resolution specificity profiles. We constru...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22438796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002411 |
_version_ | 1782227048374206464 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Mark G. F. Sikora, Martin Costanzo, Michael Boone, Charles Kim, Philip M. |
author_facet | Sun, Mark G. F. Sikora, Martin Costanzo, Michael Boone, Charles Kim, Philip M. |
author_sort | Sun, Mark G. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The analysis of network evolution has been hampered by limited availability of protein interaction data for different organisms. In this study, we investigate evolutionary mechanisms in Src Homology 3 (SH3) domain and kinase interaction networks using high-resolution specificity profiles. We constructed and examined networks for 23 fungal species ranging from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We quantify rates of different rewiring mechanisms and show that interaction change through binding site evolution is faster than through gene gain or loss. We found that SH3 interactions evolve swiftly, at rates similar to those found in phosphoregulation evolution. Importantly, we show that interaction changes are sufficiently rapid to exhibit saturation phenomena at the observed timescales. Finally, focusing on the SH3 interaction network, we observe extensive clustering of binding sites on target proteins by SH3 domains and a strong correlation between the number of domains that bind a target protein (target in-degree) and interaction conservation. The relationship between in-degree and interaction conservation is driven by two different effects, namely the number of clusters that correspond to interaction interfaces and the number of domains that bind to each cluster leads to sequence specific conservation, which in turn results in interaction conservation. In summary, we uncover several network evolution mechanisms likely to generalize across peptide recognition modules. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3305342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33053422012-03-21 Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling Sun, Mark G. F. Sikora, Martin Costanzo, Michael Boone, Charles Kim, Philip M. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The analysis of network evolution has been hampered by limited availability of protein interaction data for different organisms. In this study, we investigate evolutionary mechanisms in Src Homology 3 (SH3) domain and kinase interaction networks using high-resolution specificity profiles. We constructed and examined networks for 23 fungal species ranging from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We quantify rates of different rewiring mechanisms and show that interaction change through binding site evolution is faster than through gene gain or loss. We found that SH3 interactions evolve swiftly, at rates similar to those found in phosphoregulation evolution. Importantly, we show that interaction changes are sufficiently rapid to exhibit saturation phenomena at the observed timescales. Finally, focusing on the SH3 interaction network, we observe extensive clustering of binding sites on target proteins by SH3 domains and a strong correlation between the number of domains that bind a target protein (target in-degree) and interaction conservation. The relationship between in-degree and interaction conservation is driven by two different effects, namely the number of clusters that correspond to interaction interfaces and the number of domains that bind to each cluster leads to sequence specific conservation, which in turn results in interaction conservation. In summary, we uncover several network evolution mechanisms likely to generalize across peptide recognition modules. Public Library of Science 2012-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3305342/ /pubmed/22438796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002411 Text en Sun et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sun, Mark G. F. Sikora, Martin Costanzo, Michael Boone, Charles Kim, Philip M. Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling |
title | Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling |
title_full | Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling |
title_fullStr | Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling |
title_full_unstemmed | Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling |
title_short | Network Evolution: Rewiring and Signatures of Conservation in Signaling |
title_sort | network evolution: rewiring and signatures of conservation in signaling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22438796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunmarkgf networkevolutionrewiringandsignaturesofconservationinsignaling AT sikoramartin networkevolutionrewiringandsignaturesofconservationinsignaling AT costanzomichael networkevolutionrewiringandsignaturesofconservationinsignaling AT boonecharles networkevolutionrewiringandsignaturesofconservationinsignaling AT kimphilipm networkevolutionrewiringandsignaturesofconservationinsignaling |