Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one-stage revision. No systematic review or meta-analysis has ever compared the risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lange, Jeppe, Troelsen, Anders, Thomsen, Reimar W, Søballe, Kjeld
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Original Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500127
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S29025

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500127
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S29025

Ejemplares similares