Cargando…
Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one-stage revision. No systematic review or meta-analysis has ever compared the risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-sta...
Autores principales: | Lange, Jeppe, Troelsen, Anders, Thomsen, Reimar W, Søballe, Kjeld |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S29025 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection. A Retrospective, Observational Study on the Treatment Strategy and Prognosis in 130 Non-Selected Patients
por: Lange, Jeppe, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Goud, Annemarie L., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Infected Hip Replacements
por: Muñoz-Mahamud, Ernesto, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The role of the acetabular labrum in hip dysplasia: A literature overview
por: Hartig-Andreasen, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Risk factors for the need of hip arthroscopy following periacetabular osteotomy
por: Hartig-Andreasen, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)