Cargando…
Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
Effects of subjects’ taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3343238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8 |
_version_ | 1782231789601816576 |
---|---|
author | Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien Camacho, Sara Marina Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus |
author_facet | Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien Camacho, Sara Marina Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus |
author_sort | Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Effects of subjects’ taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion periods (TFP in seconds) were compared to taste intensities of a continuous reference of the same net tastant concentration and quality. In line with results previously reported for sucrose, pulsation-induced taste enhancement peaked around TFP for both MSG and NaCl and did not require perception of tastant pulsation. TFP and pulsation effects were independent of the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor for MSG versus ion-channel for NaCl). The absence of a relation between TFP and taste sensitivity suggests that temporal gustatory resolution and taste sensitivity are not necessarily influenced by the same factors. The results support earlier findings that early stages of taste transduction are involved in pulsation-induced taste enhancement. Pulsation-induced taste enhancement is determined by the pulsation rate (i.e. TFP) which is longer for MSG than NaCl. This is probably due to the tastant-specific interaction with the receptor rather than the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor versus ion-channel) involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3343238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33432382012-05-16 Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien Camacho, Sara Marina Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Chemosens Percept Article Effects of subjects’ taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion periods (TFP in seconds) were compared to taste intensities of a continuous reference of the same net tastant concentration and quality. In line with results previously reported for sucrose, pulsation-induced taste enhancement peaked around TFP for both MSG and NaCl and did not require perception of tastant pulsation. TFP and pulsation effects were independent of the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor for MSG versus ion-channel for NaCl). The absence of a relation between TFP and taste sensitivity suggests that temporal gustatory resolution and taste sensitivity are not necessarily influenced by the same factors. The results support earlier findings that early stages of taste transduction are involved in pulsation-induced taste enhancement. Pulsation-induced taste enhancement is determined by the pulsation rate (i.e. TFP) which is longer for MSG than NaCl. This is probably due to the tastant-specific interaction with the receptor rather than the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor versus ion-channel) involved. Springer-Verlag 2012-04-27 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3343238/ /pubmed/22611466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien Camacho, Sara Marina Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type |
title | Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type |
title_full | Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type |
title_fullStr | Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type |
title_full_unstemmed | Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type |
title_short | Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type |
title_sort | taste enhancement by pulsatile stimulation is receptor based but independent of receptor type |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3343238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bursegkerstinmarthamensien tasteenhancementbypulsatilestimulationisreceptorbasedbutindependentofreceptortype AT camachosaramarina tasteenhancementbypulsatilestimulationisreceptorbasedbutindependentofreceptortype AT bultjohanneshendrikusfranciscus tasteenhancementbypulsatilestimulationisreceptorbasedbutindependentofreceptortype |