Cargando…

Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type

Effects of subjects’ taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien, Camacho, Sara Marina, Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3343238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8
_version_ 1782231789601816576
author Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien
Camacho, Sara Marina
Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus
author_facet Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien
Camacho, Sara Marina
Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus
author_sort Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien
collection PubMed
description Effects of subjects’ taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion periods (TFP in seconds) were compared to taste intensities of a continuous reference of the same net tastant concentration and quality. In line with results previously reported for sucrose, pulsation-induced taste enhancement peaked around TFP for both MSG and NaCl and did not require perception of tastant pulsation. TFP and pulsation effects were independent of the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor for MSG versus ion-channel for NaCl). The absence of a relation between TFP and taste sensitivity suggests that temporal gustatory resolution and taste sensitivity are not necessarily influenced by the same factors. The results support earlier findings that early stages of taste transduction are involved in pulsation-induced taste enhancement. Pulsation-induced taste enhancement is determined by the pulsation rate (i.e. TFP) which is longer for MSG than NaCl. This is probably due to the tastant-specific interaction with the receptor rather than the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor versus ion-channel) involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3343238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33432382012-05-16 Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien Camacho, Sara Marina Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Chemosens Percept Article Effects of subjects’ taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion periods (TFP in seconds) were compared to taste intensities of a continuous reference of the same net tastant concentration and quality. In line with results previously reported for sucrose, pulsation-induced taste enhancement peaked around TFP for both MSG and NaCl and did not require perception of tastant pulsation. TFP and pulsation effects were independent of the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor for MSG versus ion-channel for NaCl). The absence of a relation between TFP and taste sensitivity suggests that temporal gustatory resolution and taste sensitivity are not necessarily influenced by the same factors. The results support earlier findings that early stages of taste transduction are involved in pulsation-induced taste enhancement. Pulsation-induced taste enhancement is determined by the pulsation rate (i.e. TFP) which is longer for MSG than NaCl. This is probably due to the tastant-specific interaction with the receptor rather than the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor versus ion-channel) involved. Springer-Verlag 2012-04-27 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3343238/ /pubmed/22611466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Burseg, Kerstin Martha Mensien
Camacho, Sara Marina
Bult, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus
Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
title Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
title_full Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
title_fullStr Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
title_full_unstemmed Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
title_short Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type
title_sort taste enhancement by pulsatile stimulation is receptor based but independent of receptor type
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3343238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bursegkerstinmarthamensien tasteenhancementbypulsatilestimulationisreceptorbasedbutindependentofreceptortype
AT camachosaramarina tasteenhancementbypulsatilestimulationisreceptorbasedbutindependentofreceptortype
AT bultjohanneshendrikusfranciscus tasteenhancementbypulsatilestimulationisreceptorbasedbutindependentofreceptortype