Cargando…

Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels

Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channels, comprised of pore-forming α(1) and auxiliary (β,α(2)δ) subunits, control diverse biological responses in excitable cells. Molecules blocking Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel currents (I (Ca)) profoundly regulate physiology and have many therapeutic applications. Rad/Rem/Rem2/Gem GTPases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Tingting, Puckerin, Akil, Colecraft, Henry M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22590648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037079
_version_ 1782232544097337344
author Yang, Tingting
Puckerin, Akil
Colecraft, Henry M.
author_facet Yang, Tingting
Puckerin, Akil
Colecraft, Henry M.
author_sort Yang, Tingting
collection PubMed
description Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channels, comprised of pore-forming α(1) and auxiliary (β,α(2)δ) subunits, control diverse biological responses in excitable cells. Molecules blocking Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel currents (I (Ca)) profoundly regulate physiology and have many therapeutic applications. Rad/Rem/Rem2/Gem GTPases (RGKs) strongly inhibit Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channels. Understanding how RGKs block I (Ca) is critical for insights into their physiological function, and may provide design principles for developing novel Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel inhibitors. The RGK binding sites within Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel complexes responsible for I (Ca) inhibition are ambiguous, and it is unclear whether there are mechanistic differences among distinct RGKs. All RGKs bind β subunits, but it is unknown if and how this interaction contributes to I (Ca) inhibition. We investigated the role of RGK/β interaction in Rem inhibition of recombinant Ca(V)1.2 channels, using a mutated β (β(2aTM)) selectively lacking RGK binding. Rem blocked β(2aTM)-reconstituted channels (74% inhibition) less potently than channels containing wild-type β(2a) (96% inhibition), suggesting the prevalence of both β-binding-dependent and independent modes of inhibition. Two mechanistic signatures of Rem inhibition of Ca(V)1.2 channels (decreased channel surface density and open probability), but not a third (reduced maximal gating charge), depended on Rem binding to β. We identified a novel Rem binding site in Ca(V)1.2 α(1C) N-terminus that mediated β-binding-independent inhibition. The Ca(V)2.2 α(1B) subunit lacks the Rem binding site in the N-terminus and displays a solely β-binding-dependent form of channel inhibition. Finally, we discovered an unexpected functional dichotomy amongst distinct RGKs— while Rem and Rad use both β-binding-dependent and independent mechanisms, Gem and Rem2 use only a β-binding-dependent method to inhibit Ca(V)1.2 channels. The results provide new mechanistic perspectives, and reveal unexpected variations in determinants, underlying inhibition of Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 channels by distinct RGK GTPases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33496592012-05-15 Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels Yang, Tingting Puckerin, Akil Colecraft, Henry M. PLoS One Research Article Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channels, comprised of pore-forming α(1) and auxiliary (β,α(2)δ) subunits, control diverse biological responses in excitable cells. Molecules blocking Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel currents (I (Ca)) profoundly regulate physiology and have many therapeutic applications. Rad/Rem/Rem2/Gem GTPases (RGKs) strongly inhibit Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channels. Understanding how RGKs block I (Ca) is critical for insights into their physiological function, and may provide design principles for developing novel Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel inhibitors. The RGK binding sites within Ca(V)1/Ca(V)2 channel complexes responsible for I (Ca) inhibition are ambiguous, and it is unclear whether there are mechanistic differences among distinct RGKs. All RGKs bind β subunits, but it is unknown if and how this interaction contributes to I (Ca) inhibition. We investigated the role of RGK/β interaction in Rem inhibition of recombinant Ca(V)1.2 channels, using a mutated β (β(2aTM)) selectively lacking RGK binding. Rem blocked β(2aTM)-reconstituted channels (74% inhibition) less potently than channels containing wild-type β(2a) (96% inhibition), suggesting the prevalence of both β-binding-dependent and independent modes of inhibition. Two mechanistic signatures of Rem inhibition of Ca(V)1.2 channels (decreased channel surface density and open probability), but not a third (reduced maximal gating charge), depended on Rem binding to β. We identified a novel Rem binding site in Ca(V)1.2 α(1C) N-terminus that mediated β-binding-independent inhibition. The Ca(V)2.2 α(1B) subunit lacks the Rem binding site in the N-terminus and displays a solely β-binding-dependent form of channel inhibition. Finally, we discovered an unexpected functional dichotomy amongst distinct RGKs— while Rem and Rad use both β-binding-dependent and independent mechanisms, Gem and Rem2 use only a β-binding-dependent method to inhibit Ca(V)1.2 channels. The results provide new mechanistic perspectives, and reveal unexpected variations in determinants, underlying inhibition of Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 channels by distinct RGK GTPases. Public Library of Science 2012-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3349659/ /pubmed/22590648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037079 Text en Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Tingting
Puckerin, Akil
Colecraft, Henry M.
Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels
title Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels
title_full Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels
title_fullStr Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels
title_full_unstemmed Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels
title_short Distinct RGK GTPases Differentially Use α(1)- and Auxiliary β-Binding-Dependent Mechanisms to Inhibit Ca(V)1.2/Ca(V)2.2 Channels
title_sort distinct rgk gtpases differentially use α(1)- and auxiliary β-binding-dependent mechanisms to inhibit ca(v)1.2/ca(v)2.2 channels
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22590648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037079
work_keys_str_mv AT yangtingting distinctrgkgtpasesdifferentiallyusea1andauxiliarybbindingdependentmechanismstoinhibitcav12cav22channels
AT puckerinakil distinctrgkgtpasesdifferentiallyusea1andauxiliarybbindingdependentmechanismstoinhibitcav12cav22channels
AT colecrafthenrym distinctrgkgtpasesdifferentiallyusea1andauxiliarybbindingdependentmechanismstoinhibitcav12cav22channels