Cargando…

An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students

BACKGROUND: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. METHODS: Two groups of four students ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levitt, David Stern, Hauer, Karen E., Poncelet, Ann, Mookherjee, Somnath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611330
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391
_version_ 1782233358967767040
author Levitt, David Stern
Hauer, Karen E.
Poncelet, Ann
Mookherjee, Somnath
author_facet Levitt, David Stern
Hauer, Karen E.
Poncelet, Ann
Mookherjee, Somnath
author_sort Levitt, David Stern
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. METHODS: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group. RESULTS: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship. CONCLUSION: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3355381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33553812012-05-18 An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students Levitt, David Stern Hauer, Karen E. Poncelet, Ann Mookherjee, Somnath Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. METHODS: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group. RESULTS: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship. CONCLUSION: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years. Co-Action Publishing 2012-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3355381/ /pubmed/22611330 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391 Text en © 2012 David Stern Levitt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Levitt, David Stern
Hauer, Karen E.
Poncelet, Ann
Mookherjee, Somnath
An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_full An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_fullStr An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_full_unstemmed An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_short An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_sort innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611330
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391
work_keys_str_mv AT levittdavidstern aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT hauerkarene aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT ponceletann aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT mookherjeesomnath aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT levittdavidstern innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT hauerkarene innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT ponceletann innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT mookherjeesomnath innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents