Cargando…
An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
BACKGROUND: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. METHODS: Two groups of four students ident...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611330 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391 |
_version_ | 1782233358967767040 |
---|---|
author | Levitt, David Stern Hauer, Karen E. Poncelet, Ann Mookherjee, Somnath |
author_facet | Levitt, David Stern Hauer, Karen E. Poncelet, Ann Mookherjee, Somnath |
author_sort | Levitt, David Stern |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. METHODS: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group. RESULTS: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship. CONCLUSION: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3355381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33553812012-05-18 An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students Levitt, David Stern Hauer, Karen E. Poncelet, Ann Mookherjee, Somnath Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. METHODS: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group. RESULTS: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship. CONCLUSION: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years. Co-Action Publishing 2012-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3355381/ /pubmed/22611330 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391 Text en © 2012 David Stern Levitt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Levitt, David Stern Hauer, Karen E. Poncelet, Ann Mookherjee, Somnath An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
title | An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
title_full | An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
title_fullStr | An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
title_full_unstemmed | An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
title_short | An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
title_sort | innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611330 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levittdavidstern aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT hauerkarene aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT ponceletann aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT mookherjeesomnath aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT levittdavidstern innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT hauerkarene innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT ponceletann innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents AT mookherjeesomnath innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents |