Cargando…

Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two probiotic preparations, containing live lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 4043) and their products of fermentation (organic acids and bacteriocins), as a replacement for antibiotics in stimulating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fajardo, Paula, Pastrana, Lorenzo, Méndez, Jesús, Rodríguez, Isabel, Fuciños, Clara, Guerra, Nelson P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/562635
_version_ 1782234188009701376
author Fajardo, Paula
Pastrana, Lorenzo
Méndez, Jesús
Rodríguez, Isabel
Fuciños, Clara
Guerra, Nelson P.
author_facet Fajardo, Paula
Pastrana, Lorenzo
Méndez, Jesús
Rodríguez, Isabel
Fuciños, Clara
Guerra, Nelson P.
author_sort Fajardo, Paula
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two probiotic preparations, containing live lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 4043) and their products of fermentation (organic acids and bacteriocins), as a replacement for antibiotics in stimulating health and growth of broiler chickens. The effects of the supplementation of both preparations (with proven probiotic effect in weaned piglets) and an antibiotic (avilamycin) on body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed consumption efficiency (FCE), relative intestinal weight, and intestinal microbiota counts were studied in 1-day posthatch chickens. The experiments were conducted with medium-growth Sasso X44 chickens housed in cages and with nutritional stressed Ross 308 broiler distributed in pens. Consumption of the different diets did not affect significantly the final coliform counts in Sasso X44 chickens. However, counts of lactic acid bacteria and mesophilic microorganisms were higher in the animals receiving the two probiotic preparations (P < 0.05). In the second experiment, although no differences in BWG were observed between treatments, Ross 308 broilers receiving the probiotic Lactobacillus preparation exhibited the lowest FCE values and were considered the most efficient at converting feed into live weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3362022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33620222012-06-04 Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens Fajardo, Paula Pastrana, Lorenzo Méndez, Jesús Rodríguez, Isabel Fuciños, Clara Guerra, Nelson P. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two probiotic preparations, containing live lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 4043) and their products of fermentation (organic acids and bacteriocins), as a replacement for antibiotics in stimulating health and growth of broiler chickens. The effects of the supplementation of both preparations (with proven probiotic effect in weaned piglets) and an antibiotic (avilamycin) on body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed consumption efficiency (FCE), relative intestinal weight, and intestinal microbiota counts were studied in 1-day posthatch chickens. The experiments were conducted with medium-growth Sasso X44 chickens housed in cages and with nutritional stressed Ross 308 broiler distributed in pens. Consumption of the different diets did not affect significantly the final coliform counts in Sasso X44 chickens. However, counts of lactic acid bacteria and mesophilic microorganisms were higher in the animals receiving the two probiotic preparations (P < 0.05). In the second experiment, although no differences in BWG were observed between treatments, Ross 308 broilers receiving the probiotic Lactobacillus preparation exhibited the lowest FCE values and were considered the most efficient at converting feed into live weight. The Scientific World Journal 2012-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3362022/ /pubmed/22666137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/562635 Text en Copyright © 2012 Paula Fajardo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fajardo, Paula
Pastrana, Lorenzo
Méndez, Jesús
Rodríguez, Isabel
Fuciños, Clara
Guerra, Nelson P.
Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
title Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
title_full Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
title_fullStr Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
title_short Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
title_sort effects of feeding of two potentially probiotic preparations from lactic acid bacteria on the performance and faecal microflora of broiler chickens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/562635
work_keys_str_mv AT fajardopaula effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens
AT pastranalorenzo effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens
AT mendezjesus effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens
AT rodriguezisabel effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens
AT fucinosclara effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens
AT guerranelsonp effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens