Cargando…
Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two probiotic preparations, containing live lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 4043) and their products of fermentation (organic acids and bacteriocins), as a replacement for antibiotics in stimulating...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific World Journal
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/562635 |
_version_ | 1782234188009701376 |
---|---|
author | Fajardo, Paula Pastrana, Lorenzo Méndez, Jesús Rodríguez, Isabel Fuciños, Clara Guerra, Nelson P. |
author_facet | Fajardo, Paula Pastrana, Lorenzo Méndez, Jesús Rodríguez, Isabel Fuciños, Clara Guerra, Nelson P. |
author_sort | Fajardo, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two probiotic preparations, containing live lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 4043) and their products of fermentation (organic acids and bacteriocins), as a replacement for antibiotics in stimulating health and growth of broiler chickens. The effects of the supplementation of both preparations (with proven probiotic effect in weaned piglets) and an antibiotic (avilamycin) on body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed consumption efficiency (FCE), relative intestinal weight, and intestinal microbiota counts were studied in 1-day posthatch chickens. The experiments were conducted with medium-growth Sasso X44 chickens housed in cages and with nutritional stressed Ross 308 broiler distributed in pens. Consumption of the different diets did not affect significantly the final coliform counts in Sasso X44 chickens. However, counts of lactic acid bacteria and mesophilic microorganisms were higher in the animals receiving the two probiotic preparations (P < 0.05). In the second experiment, although no differences in BWG were observed between treatments, Ross 308 broilers receiving the probiotic Lactobacillus preparation exhibited the lowest FCE values and were considered the most efficient at converting feed into live weight. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3362022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Scientific World Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33620222012-06-04 Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens Fajardo, Paula Pastrana, Lorenzo Méndez, Jesús Rodríguez, Isabel Fuciños, Clara Guerra, Nelson P. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two probiotic preparations, containing live lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 4043) and their products of fermentation (organic acids and bacteriocins), as a replacement for antibiotics in stimulating health and growth of broiler chickens. The effects of the supplementation of both preparations (with proven probiotic effect in weaned piglets) and an antibiotic (avilamycin) on body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed consumption efficiency (FCE), relative intestinal weight, and intestinal microbiota counts were studied in 1-day posthatch chickens. The experiments were conducted with medium-growth Sasso X44 chickens housed in cages and with nutritional stressed Ross 308 broiler distributed in pens. Consumption of the different diets did not affect significantly the final coliform counts in Sasso X44 chickens. However, counts of lactic acid bacteria and mesophilic microorganisms were higher in the animals receiving the two probiotic preparations (P < 0.05). In the second experiment, although no differences in BWG were observed between treatments, Ross 308 broilers receiving the probiotic Lactobacillus preparation exhibited the lowest FCE values and were considered the most efficient at converting feed into live weight. The Scientific World Journal 2012-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3362022/ /pubmed/22666137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/562635 Text en Copyright © 2012 Paula Fajardo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fajardo, Paula Pastrana, Lorenzo Méndez, Jesús Rodríguez, Isabel Fuciños, Clara Guerra, Nelson P. Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens |
title | Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens |
title_full | Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens |
title_fullStr | Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens |
title_short | Effects of Feeding of Two Potentially Probiotic Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Performance and Faecal Microflora of Broiler Chickens |
title_sort | effects of feeding of two potentially probiotic preparations from lactic acid bacteria on the performance and faecal microflora of broiler chickens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/562635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fajardopaula effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens AT pastranalorenzo effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens AT mendezjesus effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens AT rodriguezisabel effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens AT fucinosclara effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens AT guerranelsonp effectsoffeedingoftwopotentiallyprobioticpreparationsfromlacticacidbacteriaontheperformanceandfaecalmicrofloraofbroilerchickens |