Cargando…
Does Reviewing Lead to Better Learning and Decision Making? Answers from a Randomized Stock Market Experiment
BACKGROUND: The literature is not univocal about the effects of Peer Review (PR) within the context of constructivist learning. Due to the predominant focus on using PR as an assessment tool, rather than a constructivist learning activity, and because most studies implicitly assume that the benefits...
Autores principales: | Wessa, Patrick, Holliday, Ian E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037719 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Not your grandma's stock market: the stock market has changed, and not for the better
por: McTague, Jim, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Quantifying the randomness of the stock markets
por: Delgado-Bonal, Alfonso
Publicado: (2019) -
Content-Based VLE Designs Improve Learning Efficiency in Constructivist Statistics Education
por: Wessa, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Hybrid Machine Learning Technique for Forecasting Dhaka Stock Market Timing Decisions
por: Banik, Shipra, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Deep Learning for Stock Market Prediction
por: Nabipour, M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)