Cargando…

PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a new problem-based learning (PBL) method to see if it reinvigorated the learning experience. METHOD: A new PBL format called PBL 2.0, which met for 90 min two times per week, was introduced in 2009 into an 11-week integrated neuroscience course. One hu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiznia, Daniel, Korom, Robert, Marzuk, Peter, Safdieh, Joseph, Grafstein, Bernice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.17375
_version_ 1782235654337331200
author Wiznia, Daniel
Korom, Robert
Marzuk, Peter
Safdieh, Joseph
Grafstein, Bernice
author_facet Wiznia, Daniel
Korom, Robert
Marzuk, Peter
Safdieh, Joseph
Grafstein, Bernice
author_sort Wiznia, Daniel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a new problem-based learning (PBL) method to see if it reinvigorated the learning experience. METHOD: A new PBL format called PBL 2.0, which met for 90 min two times per week, was introduced in 2009 into an 11-week integrated neuroscience course. One hundred second-year medical students, divided into 10 groups of 10, who had completed their first year of medical school using a traditional PBL format, participated in PBL 2.0. Students were prohibited from using computers during the first session. Learning objectives were distributed at the end of the first day to the small groups, and students were assigned to pairs/trios responsible for leading an interactive discussion on specific learning objectives the following day. Student-led ‘lectures’ were prohibited. All students were responsible for learning all of the learning objectives so that they could participate in their discussions. RESULTS: One hundred and six students were surveyed and 98 submitted answers (92% response). The majority of groups adhered to the new PBL method. Students invested more time preparing the learning objectives. Students indicated that the level of interaction among students increased. The majority of students preferred the new PBL format. CONCLUSIONS: PBL 2.0 was effective in increasing student interaction and promoting increased learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3374499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33744992012-07-09 PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation Wiznia, Daniel Korom, Robert Marzuk, Peter Safdieh, Joseph Grafstein, Bernice Med Educ Online Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a new problem-based learning (PBL) method to see if it reinvigorated the learning experience. METHOD: A new PBL format called PBL 2.0, which met for 90 min two times per week, was introduced in 2009 into an 11-week integrated neuroscience course. One hundred second-year medical students, divided into 10 groups of 10, who had completed their first year of medical school using a traditional PBL format, participated in PBL 2.0. Students were prohibited from using computers during the first session. Learning objectives were distributed at the end of the first day to the small groups, and students were assigned to pairs/trios responsible for leading an interactive discussion on specific learning objectives the following day. Student-led ‘lectures’ were prohibited. All students were responsible for learning all of the learning objectives so that they could participate in their discussions. RESULTS: One hundred and six students were surveyed and 98 submitted answers (92% response). The majority of groups adhered to the new PBL method. Students invested more time preparing the learning objectives. Students indicated that the level of interaction among students increased. The majority of students preferred the new PBL format. CONCLUSIONS: PBL 2.0 was effective in increasing student interaction and promoting increased learning. Co-Action Publishing 2012-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3374499/ /pubmed/22778540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.17375 Text en © 2012 Daniel Wiznia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wiznia, Daniel
Korom, Robert
Marzuk, Peter
Safdieh, Joseph
Grafstein, Bernice
PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
title PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
title_full PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
title_fullStr PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
title_full_unstemmed PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
title_short PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
title_sort pbl 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.17375
work_keys_str_mv AT wizniadaniel pbl20enhancingproblembasedlearningthroughincreasedstudentparticipation
AT koromrobert pbl20enhancingproblembasedlearningthroughincreasedstudentparticipation
AT marzukpeter pbl20enhancingproblembasedlearningthroughincreasedstudentparticipation
AT safdiehjoseph pbl20enhancingproblembasedlearningthroughincreasedstudentparticipation
AT grafsteinbernice pbl20enhancingproblembasedlearningthroughincreasedstudentparticipation