Cargando…

Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit

In this paper, we summarize the results of using dynamic models borrowed from tracking theory in describing the time evolution of the state vector to have an estimate of the angular motion in a gyro-free inertial measurement unit (GF-IMU). The GF-IMU is a special type inertial measurement unit (IMU)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwan, Ezzaldeen, Knedlik, Stefan, Loffeld, Otmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120505310
_version_ 1782237003094425600
author Edwan, Ezzaldeen
Knedlik, Stefan
Loffeld, Otmar
author_facet Edwan, Ezzaldeen
Knedlik, Stefan
Loffeld, Otmar
author_sort Edwan, Ezzaldeen
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we summarize the results of using dynamic models borrowed from tracking theory in describing the time evolution of the state vector to have an estimate of the angular motion in a gyro-free inertial measurement unit (GF-IMU). The GF-IMU is a special type inertial measurement unit (IMU) that uses only a set of accelerometers in inferring the angular motion. Using distributed accelerometers, we get an angular information vector (AIV) composed of angular acceleration and quadratic angular velocity terms. We use a Kalman filter approach to estimate the angular velocity vector since it is not expressed explicitly within the AIV. The bias parameters inherent in the accelerometers measurements' produce a biased AIV and hence the AIV bias parameters are estimated within an augmented state vector. Using dynamic models, the appended bias parameters of the AIV become observable and hence we can have unbiased angular motion estimate. Moreover, a good model is required to extract the maximum amount of information from the observation. Observability analysis is done to determine the conditions for having an observable state space model. For higher grades of accelerometers and under relatively higher sampling frequency, the error of accelerometer measurements is dominated by the noise error. Consequently, simulations are conducted on two models, one has bias parameters appended in the state space model and the other is a reduced model without bias parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3386685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33866852012-07-09 Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit Edwan, Ezzaldeen Knedlik, Stefan Loffeld, Otmar Sensors (Basel) Article In this paper, we summarize the results of using dynamic models borrowed from tracking theory in describing the time evolution of the state vector to have an estimate of the angular motion in a gyro-free inertial measurement unit (GF-IMU). The GF-IMU is a special type inertial measurement unit (IMU) that uses only a set of accelerometers in inferring the angular motion. Using distributed accelerometers, we get an angular information vector (AIV) composed of angular acceleration and quadratic angular velocity terms. We use a Kalman filter approach to estimate the angular velocity vector since it is not expressed explicitly within the AIV. The bias parameters inherent in the accelerometers measurements' produce a biased AIV and hence the AIV bias parameters are estimated within an augmented state vector. Using dynamic models, the appended bias parameters of the AIV become observable and hence we can have unbiased angular motion estimate. Moreover, a good model is required to extract the maximum amount of information from the observation. Observability analysis is done to determine the conditions for having an observable state space model. For higher grades of accelerometers and under relatively higher sampling frequency, the error of accelerometer measurements is dominated by the noise error. Consequently, simulations are conducted on two models, one has bias parameters appended in the state space model and the other is a reduced model without bias parameters. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3386685/ /pubmed/22778586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120505310 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Edwan, Ezzaldeen
Knedlik, Stefan
Loffeld, Otmar
Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit
title Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit
title_full Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit
title_fullStr Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit
title_full_unstemmed Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit
title_short Angular Motion Estimation Using Dynamic Models in a Gyro-Free Inertial Measurement Unit
title_sort angular motion estimation using dynamic models in a gyro-free inertial measurement unit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120505310
work_keys_str_mv AT edwanezzaldeen angularmotionestimationusingdynamicmodelsinagyrofreeinertialmeasurementunit
AT knedlikstefan angularmotionestimationusingdynamicmodelsinagyrofreeinertialmeasurementunit
AT loffeldotmar angularmotionestimationusingdynamicmodelsinagyrofreeinertialmeasurementunit