Cargando…

Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target

Lysosomal cysteine cathepsins belong to a family of 11 human proteolytic enzymes. Some of them correlate with progression in a variety of cancers and therefore are considered as potential therapeutic targets. Until recently, the contribution of individual cathepsins to tumorigenesis and tumor progre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinheckel, Thomas, Peters, Christoph, Krüger, Achim, Turk, Boris, Vasiljeva, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00133
_version_ 1782237818632798208
author Reinheckel, Thomas
Peters, Christoph
Krüger, Achim
Turk, Boris
Vasiljeva, Olga
author_facet Reinheckel, Thomas
Peters, Christoph
Krüger, Achim
Turk, Boris
Vasiljeva, Olga
author_sort Reinheckel, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Lysosomal cysteine cathepsins belong to a family of 11 human proteolytic enzymes. Some of them correlate with progression in a variety of cancers and therefore are considered as potential therapeutic targets. Until recently, the contribution of individual cathepsins to tumorigenesis and tumor progression remained unknown. By crossing various types of mouse cancer models with mice where specific cathepsins have been ablated, we contributed to this gap of knowledge and will summarize the results in this report. The employed models are the Rip1-Tag2 model for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the K14-HPV16 model for squamous skin and cervical cancers, and the MMTV-PyMT model for metastasizing breast cancer, the KPC model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and the APC(min) mice developing early stages of intestinal neoplasia. All models harbor mutations in relevant tumor suppressors and/or cell-type specific expression of potent oncogenes, which initiate de novo carcinogenesis in the targeted tissues. In all these models deletion of cathepsin B led to suppression of the aggressiveness of the respective cancer phenotype. Cathepsin B is networking with other proteases as it was shown for cathepsin X/Z. In contrast, deletion of cathepsin L was beneficial in the RiP1-Tag2 model, but enhanced tumorigenesis in the APC(min), and the K14-HPV16 mice. A logical consequence of these results would be to further pursue selective inhibition of cathepsin B. Moreover, it became clear that cathepsins B and S derived from cells of the tumor microenvironment support cancer growth. Strikingly, delivery of broad spectrum cysteine cathepsin inhibitors in the tumor microenvironment disrupts the permissive ecosystem of the cancer and results in impaired growth or even in regression of the tumor. In addition, combination of cysteine cathepsin inhibition and standard chemotherapy improves the therapeutic response of the latter. Taken together, the next preclinical challenges for developing cathepsin inhibition as cancer therapy might be the improvement of inhibitor selectivity and targeted delivery to the tumor microenvironment and investigation of the biological context of the individual factors within the complex proteolytic network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3394080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33940802012-07-13 Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target Reinheckel, Thomas Peters, Christoph Krüger, Achim Turk, Boris Vasiljeva, Olga Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Lysosomal cysteine cathepsins belong to a family of 11 human proteolytic enzymes. Some of them correlate with progression in a variety of cancers and therefore are considered as potential therapeutic targets. Until recently, the contribution of individual cathepsins to tumorigenesis and tumor progression remained unknown. By crossing various types of mouse cancer models with mice where specific cathepsins have been ablated, we contributed to this gap of knowledge and will summarize the results in this report. The employed models are the Rip1-Tag2 model for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the K14-HPV16 model for squamous skin and cervical cancers, and the MMTV-PyMT model for metastasizing breast cancer, the KPC model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and the APC(min) mice developing early stages of intestinal neoplasia. All models harbor mutations in relevant tumor suppressors and/or cell-type specific expression of potent oncogenes, which initiate de novo carcinogenesis in the targeted tissues. In all these models deletion of cathepsin B led to suppression of the aggressiveness of the respective cancer phenotype. Cathepsin B is networking with other proteases as it was shown for cathepsin X/Z. In contrast, deletion of cathepsin L was beneficial in the RiP1-Tag2 model, but enhanced tumorigenesis in the APC(min), and the K14-HPV16 mice. A logical consequence of these results would be to further pursue selective inhibition of cathepsin B. Moreover, it became clear that cathepsins B and S derived from cells of the tumor microenvironment support cancer growth. Strikingly, delivery of broad spectrum cysteine cathepsin inhibitors in the tumor microenvironment disrupts the permissive ecosystem of the cancer and results in impaired growth or even in regression of the tumor. In addition, combination of cysteine cathepsin inhibition and standard chemotherapy improves the therapeutic response of the latter. Taken together, the next preclinical challenges for developing cathepsin inhibition as cancer therapy might be the improvement of inhibitor selectivity and targeted delivery to the tumor microenvironment and investigation of the biological context of the individual factors within the complex proteolytic network. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3394080/ /pubmed/22798952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00133 Text en Copyright © 2012 Reinheckel, Peters, Krüger, Turk and Vasiljeva. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Reinheckel, Thomas
Peters, Christoph
Krüger, Achim
Turk, Boris
Vasiljeva, Olga
Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target
title Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target
title_full Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target
title_fullStr Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target
title_full_unstemmed Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target
title_short Differential Impact of Cysteine Cathepsins on Genetic Mouse Models of De novo Carcinogenesis: Cathepsin B as Emerging Therapeutic Target
title_sort differential impact of cysteine cathepsins on genetic mouse models of de novo carcinogenesis: cathepsin b as emerging therapeutic target
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00133
work_keys_str_mv AT reinheckelthomas differentialimpactofcysteinecathepsinsongeneticmousemodelsofdenovocarcinogenesiscathepsinbasemergingtherapeutictarget
AT peterschristoph differentialimpactofcysteinecathepsinsongeneticmousemodelsofdenovocarcinogenesiscathepsinbasemergingtherapeutictarget
AT krugerachim differentialimpactofcysteinecathepsinsongeneticmousemodelsofdenovocarcinogenesiscathepsinbasemergingtherapeutictarget
AT turkboris differentialimpactofcysteinecathepsinsongeneticmousemodelsofdenovocarcinogenesiscathepsinbasemergingtherapeutictarget
AT vasiljevaolga differentialimpactofcysteinecathepsinsongeneticmousemodelsofdenovocarcinogenesiscathepsinbasemergingtherapeutictarget