Cargando…

Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation

To monitor eukaryotic mRNA metabolism, we developed comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA). cDTA provides absolute rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) cells with the use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) as an internal standard. cDTA uses nonperturbing metab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Mai, Schwalb, Björn, Schulz, Daniel, Pirkl, Nicole, Etzold, Stefanie, Larivière, Laurent, Maier, Kerstin C., Seizl, Martin, Tresch, Achim, Cramer, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22466169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.130161.111
_version_ 1782238110284775424
author Sun, Mai
Schwalb, Björn
Schulz, Daniel
Pirkl, Nicole
Etzold, Stefanie
Larivière, Laurent
Maier, Kerstin C.
Seizl, Martin
Tresch, Achim
Cramer, Patrick
author_facet Sun, Mai
Schwalb, Björn
Schulz, Daniel
Pirkl, Nicole
Etzold, Stefanie
Larivière, Laurent
Maier, Kerstin C.
Seizl, Martin
Tresch, Achim
Cramer, Patrick
author_sort Sun, Mai
collection PubMed
description To monitor eukaryotic mRNA metabolism, we developed comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA). cDTA provides absolute rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) cells with the use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) as an internal standard. cDTA uses nonperturbing metabolic labeling that supersedes conventional methods for mRNA turnover analysis. cDTA reveals that Sc and Sp transcripts that encode orthologous proteins have similar synthesis rates, whereas decay rates are fivefold lower in Sp, resulting in similar mRNA concentrations despite the larger Sp cell volume. cDTA of Sc mutants reveals that a eukaryote can buffer mRNA levels. Impairing transcription with a point mutation in RNA polymerase (Pol) II causes decreased mRNA synthesis rates as expected, but also decreased decay rates. Impairing mRNA degradation by deleting deadenylase subunits of the Ccr4–Not complex causes decreased decay rates as expected, but also decreased synthesis rates. Extended kinetic modeling reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation that may be achieved by a factor that inhibits synthesis and enhances degradation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3396375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33963752013-01-01 Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation Sun, Mai Schwalb, Björn Schulz, Daniel Pirkl, Nicole Etzold, Stefanie Larivière, Laurent Maier, Kerstin C. Seizl, Martin Tresch, Achim Cramer, Patrick Genome Res Method To monitor eukaryotic mRNA metabolism, we developed comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA). cDTA provides absolute rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) cells with the use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) as an internal standard. cDTA uses nonperturbing metabolic labeling that supersedes conventional methods for mRNA turnover analysis. cDTA reveals that Sc and Sp transcripts that encode orthologous proteins have similar synthesis rates, whereas decay rates are fivefold lower in Sp, resulting in similar mRNA concentrations despite the larger Sp cell volume. cDTA of Sc mutants reveals that a eukaryote can buffer mRNA levels. Impairing transcription with a point mutation in RNA polymerase (Pol) II causes decreased mRNA synthesis rates as expected, but also decreased decay rates. Impairing mRNA degradation by deleting deadenylase subunits of the Ccr4–Not complex causes decreased decay rates as expected, but also decreased synthesis rates. Extended kinetic modeling reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation that may be achieved by a factor that inhibits synthesis and enhances degradation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2012-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3396375/ /pubmed/22466169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.130161.111 Text en © 2012, Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Method
Sun, Mai
Schwalb, Björn
Schulz, Daniel
Pirkl, Nicole
Etzold, Stefanie
Larivière, Laurent
Maier, Kerstin C.
Seizl, Martin
Tresch, Achim
Cramer, Patrick
Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation
title Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation
title_full Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation
title_fullStr Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation
title_short Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation
title_sort comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cdta) reveals mutual feedback between mrna synthesis and degradation
topic Method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22466169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.130161.111
work_keys_str_mv AT sunmai comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT schwalbbjorn comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT schulzdaniel comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT pirklnicole comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT etzoldstefanie comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT larivierelaurent comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT maierkerstinc comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT seizlmartin comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT treschachim comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation
AT cramerpatrick comparativedynamictranscriptomeanalysiscdtarevealsmutualfeedbackbetweenmrnasynthesisanddegradation