Cargando…

KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains one of the largest hurdles in cancer therapeutics to date. The most advanced treatment option for mCRC patients are anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to and inhibit the activity of EGFR. Wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brand, Toni M., Wheeler, Deric L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Landes Bioscience 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22714415
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.18751
_version_ 1782238341632098304
author Brand, Toni M.
Wheeler, Deric L.
author_facet Brand, Toni M.
Wheeler, Deric L.
author_sort Brand, Toni M.
collection PubMed
description The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains one of the largest hurdles in cancer therapeutics to date. The most advanced treatment option for mCRC patients are anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to and inhibit the activity of EGFR. While the use of anti-EGFR mABs has had great impact in the treatment of mCRC, it has now been widely accepted that mCRC tumors with a mutation in the small GTPase KRAS do not respond to these therapies. KRAS mutations allow for EGFR independent activation of various oncogenic signaling cascades. In attempts to inhibit KRAS mutant tumor growth, BRAF, MEK and farsenyltransferase inhibitors have been used, however, their clinical efficacy is still accruing in the setting of CRC. Recent data suggests that various other inhibitors, including inhibitors of Src family kinases (SFK) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET), may have potential preclinical and clinical success in KRAS mutant tumors. Additionally, it is becoming increasingly clear that different KRAS missense mutations may have varied biological responses to cetuximab, suggesting that cetuximab may still be a potential therapeutic option in some KRAS mutant tumors. In this review, we highlight the importance for both improved multimodality approaches for treating KRAS mutant mCRC tumors and stratification of KRAS mutations in response to different treatment regimes in order to optimize the best possible care for mCRC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Landes Bioscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33989152012-07-18 KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present Brand, Toni M. Wheeler, Deric L. Small GTPases Commentary The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains one of the largest hurdles in cancer therapeutics to date. The most advanced treatment option for mCRC patients are anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to and inhibit the activity of EGFR. While the use of anti-EGFR mABs has had great impact in the treatment of mCRC, it has now been widely accepted that mCRC tumors with a mutation in the small GTPase KRAS do not respond to these therapies. KRAS mutations allow for EGFR independent activation of various oncogenic signaling cascades. In attempts to inhibit KRAS mutant tumor growth, BRAF, MEK and farsenyltransferase inhibitors have been used, however, their clinical efficacy is still accruing in the setting of CRC. Recent data suggests that various other inhibitors, including inhibitors of Src family kinases (SFK) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET), may have potential preclinical and clinical success in KRAS mutant tumors. Additionally, it is becoming increasingly clear that different KRAS missense mutations may have varied biological responses to cetuximab, suggesting that cetuximab may still be a potential therapeutic option in some KRAS mutant tumors. In this review, we highlight the importance for both improved multimodality approaches for treating KRAS mutant mCRC tumors and stratification of KRAS mutations in response to different treatment regimes in order to optimize the best possible care for mCRC patients. Landes Bioscience 2012-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3398915/ /pubmed/22714415 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.18751 Text en Copyright © 2012 Landes Bioscience http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Brand, Toni M.
Wheeler, Deric L.
KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present
title KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present
title_full KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present
title_fullStr KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present
title_full_unstemmed KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present
title_short KRAS mutant colorectal tumors: Past and present
title_sort kras mutant colorectal tumors: past and present
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22714415
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.18751
work_keys_str_mv AT brandtonim krasmutantcolorectaltumorspastandpresent
AT wheelerdericl krasmutantcolorectaltumorspastandpresent