Cargando…

Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool

BACKGROUND: Peer observation of Teaching involves observers providing descriptive feedback to their peers on learning and teaching practice as a means to improve quality of teaching. This study employed and assessed peer observation as a constructive, developmental process for members of a Pediatric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sullivan, Peter B, Buckle, Alexandra, Nicky, Gregg, Atkinson, Sarah H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22559217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-26
_version_ 1782239263793872896
author Sullivan, Peter B
Buckle, Alexandra
Nicky, Gregg
Atkinson, Sarah H
author_facet Sullivan, Peter B
Buckle, Alexandra
Nicky, Gregg
Atkinson, Sarah H
author_sort Sullivan, Peter B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peer observation of Teaching involves observers providing descriptive feedback to their peers on learning and teaching practice as a means to improve quality of teaching. This study employed and assessed peer observation as a constructive, developmental process for members of a Pediatric Teaching Faculty. METHODS: This study describes how peer observation was implemented as part of a teaching faculty development program and how it was perceived by teachers. The PoT process was divided into 4 stages: pre-observation meeting, observation, post-observation feedback and reflection. Particular care was taken to ensure that teachers understood that the observation and feedback was a developmental and not an evaluative process. Twenty teachers had their teaching peer observed by trained Faculty members and gave an e-mail ‘sound-bite’ of their perceptions of the process. Teaching activities included lectures, problem-based learning, small group teaching, case-based teaching and ward-based teaching sessions. RESULTS: Teachers were given detailed verbal and written feedback based on the observer’s and students’ observations. Teachers’ perceptions were that PoT was useful and relevant to their teaching practice. Teachers valued receiving feedback and viewed PoT as an opportunity for insight and reflection. The process of PoT was viewed as non-threatening and teachers thought that PoT enhanced the quality of their teaching, promoted professional development and was critical for Faculty development. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PoT can be used in a constructive way to improve course content and delivery, to support and encourage medical teachers, and to reinforce good teaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3406982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34069822012-07-28 Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool Sullivan, Peter B Buckle, Alexandra Nicky, Gregg Atkinson, Sarah H BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Peer observation of Teaching involves observers providing descriptive feedback to their peers on learning and teaching practice as a means to improve quality of teaching. This study employed and assessed peer observation as a constructive, developmental process for members of a Pediatric Teaching Faculty. METHODS: This study describes how peer observation was implemented as part of a teaching faculty development program and how it was perceived by teachers. The PoT process was divided into 4 stages: pre-observation meeting, observation, post-observation feedback and reflection. Particular care was taken to ensure that teachers understood that the observation and feedback was a developmental and not an evaluative process. Twenty teachers had their teaching peer observed by trained Faculty members and gave an e-mail ‘sound-bite’ of their perceptions of the process. Teaching activities included lectures, problem-based learning, small group teaching, case-based teaching and ward-based teaching sessions. RESULTS: Teachers were given detailed verbal and written feedback based on the observer’s and students’ observations. Teachers’ perceptions were that PoT was useful and relevant to their teaching practice. Teachers valued receiving feedback and viewed PoT as an opportunity for insight and reflection. The process of PoT was viewed as non-threatening and teachers thought that PoT enhanced the quality of their teaching, promoted professional development and was critical for Faculty development. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PoT can be used in a constructive way to improve course content and delivery, to support and encourage medical teachers, and to reinforce good teaching. BioMed Central 2012-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3406982/ /pubmed/22559217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-26 Text en Copyright ©2012 Sullivan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sullivan, Peter B
Buckle, Alexandra
Nicky, Gregg
Atkinson, Sarah H
Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
title Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
title_full Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
title_fullStr Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
title_full_unstemmed Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
title_short Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
title_sort peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22559217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-26
work_keys_str_mv AT sullivanpeterb peerobservationofteachingasafacultydevelopmenttool
AT bucklealexandra peerobservationofteachingasafacultydevelopmenttool
AT nickygregg peerobservationofteachingasafacultydevelopmenttool
AT atkinsonsarahh peerobservationofteachingasafacultydevelopmenttool