Cargando…
Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus
While many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268 |
_version_ | 1782240038367526912 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Graham G. Sereno, Sara C. O’Donnell, Patrick J. |
author_facet | Scott, Graham G. Sereno, Sara C. O’Donnell, Patrick J. |
author_sort | Scott, Graham G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | While many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within persuasive messages influenced attitudes and whether the processing of such communications could be modulated by regulatory focus. Using a 2 (Message: Positive, Negative) × 2 (Words: Positive, Negative) design, participants read car reviews and rated each on a series of semantic differentials and product recommendations. While positive messages were always rated higher than negative ones, the valence of a message’s component words differentially impacted attitudes toward distinct aspects of the product. On promotion-focus features, messages containing negative words produced higher ratings; for prevention-focus aspects, those with positive words resulted in higher ratings. We argue that adopting a prevention- or promotion-focused stance can influence the interpretation of emotion words in relation to overall message comprehension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3413181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34131812012-08-13 Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus Scott, Graham G. Sereno, Sara C. O’Donnell, Patrick J. Front Psychol Psychology While many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within persuasive messages influenced attitudes and whether the processing of such communications could be modulated by regulatory focus. Using a 2 (Message: Positive, Negative) × 2 (Words: Positive, Negative) design, participants read car reviews and rated each on a series of semantic differentials and product recommendations. While positive messages were always rated higher than negative ones, the valence of a message’s component words differentially impacted attitudes toward distinct aspects of the product. On promotion-focus features, messages containing negative words produced higher ratings; for prevention-focus aspects, those with positive words resulted in higher ratings. We argue that adopting a prevention- or promotion-focused stance can influence the interpretation of emotion words in relation to overall message comprehension. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3413181/ /pubmed/22891062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268 Text en Copyright © 2012 Scott, Sereno and O’Donnell. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Scott, Graham G. Sereno, Sara C. O’Donnell, Patrick J. Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus |
title | Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus |
title_full | Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus |
title_fullStr | Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus |
title_full_unstemmed | Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus |
title_short | Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It’s Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus |
title_sort | is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? it’s geared toward your regulatory focus |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottgrahamg isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardyourregulatoryfocus AT serenosarac isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardyourregulatoryfocus AT odonnellpatrickj isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardyourregulatoryfocus |