Cargando…

Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?

INTRODUCTION: This research sought to extend knowledge about bystanders in bullying situations with a focus on the motivations that lead them to different responses. The 2 primary goals of this study were to investigate the reasons for children's decisions to help or not to help a victim when w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thornberg, Robert, Tenenbaum, Laura, Varjas, Kris, Meyers, Joel, Jungert, Tomas, Vanegas, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22900122
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792
_version_ 1782240398707523584
author Thornberg, Robert
Tenenbaum, Laura
Varjas, Kris
Meyers, Joel
Jungert, Tomas
Vanegas, Gina
author_facet Thornberg, Robert
Tenenbaum, Laura
Varjas, Kris
Meyers, Joel
Jungert, Tomas
Vanegas, Gina
author_sort Thornberg, Robert
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This research sought to extend knowledge about bystanders in bullying situations with a focus on the motivations that lead them to different responses. The 2 primary goals of this study were to investigate the reasons for children's decisions to help or not to help a victim when witnessing bullying, and to generate a grounded theory (or conceptual framework) of bystander motivation in bullying situations. METHODS: Thirty students ranging in age from 9 to 15 years (M = 11.9; SD = 1.7) from an elementary and middle school in the southeastern United States participated in this study. Open- ended, semi-structured interviews were used, and sessions ranged from 30 to 45 minutes. We conducted qualitative methodology and analyses to gain an in-depth understanding of children's perspectives and concerns when witnessing bullying. RESULTS: A key finding was a conceptual framework of bystander motivation to intervene in bullying situations suggesting that deciding whether to help or not help the victim in a bullying situation depends on how bystanders define and evaluate the situation, the social context, and their own agency. Qualitative analysis revealed 5 themes related to bystander motives and included: interpretation of harm in the bullying situation, emotional reactions, social evaluating, moral evaluating, and intervention self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: Given the themes that emerged surrounding bystanders' motives to intervene or abstain from intervening, respondents reported 3 key elements that need to be confirmed in future research and that may have implications for future work on bullying prevention. These included: first, the potential importance of clear communication to children that adults expect bystanders to intervene when witnessing bullying; second, the potential of direct education about how bystanders can intervene to increase children's self-efficacy as defenders of those who are victims of bullying; and third, the assumption that it may be effective to encourage children's belief that bullying is morally wrong.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3415829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34158292012-08-16 Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene? Thornberg, Robert Tenenbaum, Laura Varjas, Kris Meyers, Joel Jungert, Tomas Vanegas, Gina West J Emerg Med Violence INTRODUCTION: This research sought to extend knowledge about bystanders in bullying situations with a focus on the motivations that lead them to different responses. The 2 primary goals of this study were to investigate the reasons for children's decisions to help or not to help a victim when witnessing bullying, and to generate a grounded theory (or conceptual framework) of bystander motivation in bullying situations. METHODS: Thirty students ranging in age from 9 to 15 years (M = 11.9; SD = 1.7) from an elementary and middle school in the southeastern United States participated in this study. Open- ended, semi-structured interviews were used, and sessions ranged from 30 to 45 minutes. We conducted qualitative methodology and analyses to gain an in-depth understanding of children's perspectives and concerns when witnessing bullying. RESULTS: A key finding was a conceptual framework of bystander motivation to intervene in bullying situations suggesting that deciding whether to help or not help the victim in a bullying situation depends on how bystanders define and evaluate the situation, the social context, and their own agency. Qualitative analysis revealed 5 themes related to bystander motives and included: interpretation of harm in the bullying situation, emotional reactions, social evaluating, moral evaluating, and intervention self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: Given the themes that emerged surrounding bystanders' motives to intervene or abstain from intervening, respondents reported 3 key elements that need to be confirmed in future research and that may have implications for future work on bullying prevention. These included: first, the potential importance of clear communication to children that adults expect bystanders to intervene when witnessing bullying; second, the potential of direct education about how bystanders can intervene to increase children's self-efficacy as defenders of those who are victims of bullying; and third, the assumption that it may be effective to encourage children's belief that bullying is morally wrong. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3415829/ /pubmed/22900122 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792 Text en Copyright © 2012 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Violence
Thornberg, Robert
Tenenbaum, Laura
Varjas, Kris
Meyers, Joel
Jungert, Tomas
Vanegas, Gina
Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
title Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
title_full Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
title_fullStr Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
title_full_unstemmed Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
title_short Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
title_sort bystander motivation in bullying incidents: to intervene or not to intervene?
topic Violence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22900122
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792
work_keys_str_mv AT thornbergrobert bystandermotivationinbullyingincidentstointerveneornottointervene
AT tenenbaumlaura bystandermotivationinbullyingincidentstointerveneornottointervene
AT varjaskris bystandermotivationinbullyingincidentstointerveneornottointervene
AT meyersjoel bystandermotivationinbullyingincidentstointerveneornottointervene
AT jungerttomas bystandermotivationinbullyingincidentstointerveneornottointervene
AT vanegasgina bystandermotivationinbullyingincidentstointerveneornottointervene