Cargando…

Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience

BACKGROUND: Advocacy is increasingly being recognized as a core element of medical professionalism and efforts are underway to incorporate advocacy training into graduate and undergraduate medical school curricula. While limited data exist to quantify physician attitudes toward advocacy, even less h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huntoon, Kristin M, McCluney, Colin J, Wiley, Elizabeth A, Scannell, Christopher A, Bruno, Richard, Stull, Matthew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22726361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-47
_version_ 1782240603826814976
author Huntoon, Kristin M
McCluney, Colin J
Wiley, Elizabeth A
Scannell, Christopher A
Bruno, Richard
Stull, Matthew J
author_facet Huntoon, Kristin M
McCluney, Colin J
Wiley, Elizabeth A
Scannell, Christopher A
Bruno, Richard
Stull, Matthew J
author_sort Huntoon, Kristin M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advocacy is increasingly being recognized as a core element of medical professionalism and efforts are underway to incorporate advocacy training into graduate and undergraduate medical school curricula. While limited data exist to quantify physician attitudes toward advocacy, even less has been done to assess the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of future physicians. The purpose of this study was to assess students’ experiences and attitudes toward legislative advocacy, cutting out using a convience sample. METHODS: A paper survey based on previously validated surveys was administered to a convenience sample of premedical and medical student participants attending a National Advocacy Day in Washington, DC, in March 2011, both before and after their advocacy experiences. Responses were anonymous and either categorical ( or ordinal, using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed statistically to evaluate demographics and compare changes in pre- and post-experience attitude and skills. RESULTS: Data from 108 pre-advocacy and 50 post-advocacy surveys were analyzed yielding a response rate of 46.3%. Following a single advocacy experience, subjects felt they were more likely to contact their legislators about healthcare issues (p = 0.03), to meet in person with their legislators (p < 0.01), and to advocate for populations' health needs (p = 0.04). Participants endorsed an increased perception of the role of a physician advocate extending beyond individual patients (p = 0.03). Participants disagreed with the statement that their formal curricula adequately covered legislative healthcare advocacy. Additionally, respondents indicated that they plan to engage in legislative advocacy activities in the future (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A one-time practical advocacy experience has a positive influence on students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes towards legislative advocacy. Practical experience is an important method of furthering medical education in advocacy and further research is necessary to assess its impact in a broader population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3418180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34181802012-08-14 Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience Huntoon, Kristin M McCluney, Colin J Wiley, Elizabeth A Scannell, Christopher A Bruno, Richard Stull, Matthew J BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Advocacy is increasingly being recognized as a core element of medical professionalism and efforts are underway to incorporate advocacy training into graduate and undergraduate medical school curricula. While limited data exist to quantify physician attitudes toward advocacy, even less has been done to assess the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of future physicians. The purpose of this study was to assess students’ experiences and attitudes toward legislative advocacy, cutting out using a convience sample. METHODS: A paper survey based on previously validated surveys was administered to a convenience sample of premedical and medical student participants attending a National Advocacy Day in Washington, DC, in March 2011, both before and after their advocacy experiences. Responses were anonymous and either categorical ( or ordinal, using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed statistically to evaluate demographics and compare changes in pre- and post-experience attitude and skills. RESULTS: Data from 108 pre-advocacy and 50 post-advocacy surveys were analyzed yielding a response rate of 46.3%. Following a single advocacy experience, subjects felt they were more likely to contact their legislators about healthcare issues (p = 0.03), to meet in person with their legislators (p < 0.01), and to advocate for populations' health needs (p = 0.04). Participants endorsed an increased perception of the role of a physician advocate extending beyond individual patients (p = 0.03). Participants disagreed with the statement that their formal curricula adequately covered legislative healthcare advocacy. Additionally, respondents indicated that they plan to engage in legislative advocacy activities in the future (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A one-time practical advocacy experience has a positive influence on students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes towards legislative advocacy. Practical experience is an important method of furthering medical education in advocacy and further research is necessary to assess its impact in a broader population. BioMed Central 2012-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3418180/ /pubmed/22726361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-47 Text en Copyright ©2012 Huntoon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huntoon, Kristin M
McCluney, Colin J
Wiley, Elizabeth A
Scannell, Christopher A
Bruno, Richard
Stull, Matthew J
Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
title Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
title_full Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
title_fullStr Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
title_short Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
title_sort self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22726361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-47
work_keys_str_mv AT huntoonkristinm selfreportedevaluationofcompetenciesandattitudesbyphysiciansintrainingbeforeandafterasingledaylegislativeadvocacyexperience
AT mccluneycolinj selfreportedevaluationofcompetenciesandattitudesbyphysiciansintrainingbeforeandafterasingledaylegislativeadvocacyexperience
AT wileyelizabetha selfreportedevaluationofcompetenciesandattitudesbyphysiciansintrainingbeforeandafterasingledaylegislativeadvocacyexperience
AT scannellchristophera selfreportedevaluationofcompetenciesandattitudesbyphysiciansintrainingbeforeandafterasingledaylegislativeadvocacyexperience
AT brunorichard selfreportedevaluationofcompetenciesandattitudesbyphysiciansintrainingbeforeandafterasingledaylegislativeadvocacyexperience
AT stullmatthewj selfreportedevaluationofcompetenciesandattitudesbyphysiciansintrainingbeforeandafterasingledaylegislativeadvocacyexperience