Cargando…

Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist

BACKGROUND: Making health care safer is a key policy priority worldwide. In specialty training, medical educators may unintentionally impact on patient safety e.g. through failures of supervision; providing limited feedback on performance; and letting poorly developed behaviours continue unchecked....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowie, Paul, McKay, John, Kelly, Moya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22721273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-62
_version_ 1782240611592568832
author Bowie, Paul
McKay, John
Kelly, Moya
author_facet Bowie, Paul
McKay, John
Kelly, Moya
author_sort Bowie, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Making health care safer is a key policy priority worldwide. In specialty training, medical educators may unintentionally impact on patient safety e.g. through failures of supervision; providing limited feedback on performance; and letting poorly developed behaviours continue unchecked. Doctors-in-training are also known to be susceptible to medical error. Ensuring that all essential educational issues are addressed during training is problematic given the scale of the tasks to be undertaken. Human error and the reliability of local systems may increase the risk of safety-critical topics being inadequately covered. However adherence to a checklist reminder may improve the reliability of task delivery and maximise harm reduction. We aimed to prioritise the most safety-critical issues to be addressed in the first 12-weeks of specialty training in the general practice environment and validate a related checklist reminder. METHODS: We used mixed methods with different groups of GP educators (n = 127) and specialty trainees (n = 9) in two Scottish regions to prioritise, develop and validate checklist content. Generation and refinement of checklist themes and items were undertaken on an iterative basis using a range of methods including small group work in dedicated workshops; a modified-Delphi process; and telephone interviews. The relevance of potential checklist items was rated using a 4-point scale content validity index to inform final inclusion. RESULTS: 14 themes (e.g. prescribing safely; dealing with medical emergency; implications of poor record keeping; and effective & safe communication) and 47 related items (e.g. how to safety-net face-to-face or over the telephone; knowledge of practice systems for results handling; recognition of harm in children) were judged to be essential safety-critical educational issues to be covered. The mean content validity index ratio was 0.98. CONCLUSION: A checklist was developed and validated for educational supervisors to assist in the reliable delivery of safety-critical educational issues in the opening 12-week period of training, and aligned with national curriculum competencies. The tool can also be adapted for use as a self-assessment instrument by trainees to guide patient safety-related learning needs. Dissemination and implementation of the checklist and self-rating scale are proceeding on a national, voluntary basis with plans to evaluate its feasibility and educational impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3418214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34182142012-08-14 Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist Bowie, Paul McKay, John Kelly, Moya BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Making health care safer is a key policy priority worldwide. In specialty training, medical educators may unintentionally impact on patient safety e.g. through failures of supervision; providing limited feedback on performance; and letting poorly developed behaviours continue unchecked. Doctors-in-training are also known to be susceptible to medical error. Ensuring that all essential educational issues are addressed during training is problematic given the scale of the tasks to be undertaken. Human error and the reliability of local systems may increase the risk of safety-critical topics being inadequately covered. However adherence to a checklist reminder may improve the reliability of task delivery and maximise harm reduction. We aimed to prioritise the most safety-critical issues to be addressed in the first 12-weeks of specialty training in the general practice environment and validate a related checklist reminder. METHODS: We used mixed methods with different groups of GP educators (n = 127) and specialty trainees (n = 9) in two Scottish regions to prioritise, develop and validate checklist content. Generation and refinement of checklist themes and items were undertaken on an iterative basis using a range of methods including small group work in dedicated workshops; a modified-Delphi process; and telephone interviews. The relevance of potential checklist items was rated using a 4-point scale content validity index to inform final inclusion. RESULTS: 14 themes (e.g. prescribing safely; dealing with medical emergency; implications of poor record keeping; and effective & safe communication) and 47 related items (e.g. how to safety-net face-to-face or over the telephone; knowledge of practice systems for results handling; recognition of harm in children) were judged to be essential safety-critical educational issues to be covered. The mean content validity index ratio was 0.98. CONCLUSION: A checklist was developed and validated for educational supervisors to assist in the reliable delivery of safety-critical educational issues in the opening 12-week period of training, and aligned with national curriculum competencies. The tool can also be adapted for use as a self-assessment instrument by trainees to guide patient safety-related learning needs. Dissemination and implementation of the checklist and self-rating scale are proceeding on a national, voluntary basis with plans to evaluate its feasibility and educational impact. BioMed Central 2012-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3418214/ /pubmed/22721273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-62 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bowie et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bowie, Paul
McKay, John
Kelly, Moya
Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
title Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
title_full Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
title_fullStr Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
title_full_unstemmed Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
title_short Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
title_sort maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22721273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-62
work_keys_str_mv AT bowiepaul maximisingharmreductioninearlyspecialtytrainingforgeneralpracticevalidationofasafetychecklist
AT mckayjohn maximisingharmreductioninearlyspecialtytrainingforgeneralpracticevalidationofasafetychecklist
AT kellymoya maximisingharmreductioninearlyspecialtytrainingforgeneralpracticevalidationofasafetychecklist