Cargando…

A simple theoretical framework for understanding heterogeneous differentiation of CD4(+) T cells

BACKGROUND: CD4(+) T cells have several subsets of functional phenotypes, which play critical yet diverse roles in the immune system. Pathogen-driven differentiation of these subsets of cells is often heterogeneous in terms of the induced phenotypic diversity. In vitro recapitulation of heterogeneou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Tian, Xing, Jianhua, Li, Liwu, Tyson, John J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3436737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22697466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-6-66
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: CD4(+) T cells have several subsets of functional phenotypes, which play critical yet diverse roles in the immune system. Pathogen-driven differentiation of these subsets of cells is often heterogeneous in terms of the induced phenotypic diversity. In vitro recapitulation of heterogeneous differentiation under homogeneous experimental conditions indicates some highly regulated mechanisms by which multiple phenotypes of CD4(+) T cells can be generated from a single population of naïve CD4(+) T cells. Therefore, conceptual understanding of induced heterogeneous differentiation will shed light on the mechanisms controlling the response of populations of CD4(+) T cells under physiological conditions. RESULTS: We present a simple theoretical framework to show how heterogeneous differentiation in a two-master-regulator paradigm can be governed by a signaling network motif common to all subsets of CD4(+) T cells. With this motif, a population of naïve CD4(+) T cells can integrate the signals from their environment to generate a functionally diverse population with robust commitment of individual cells. Notably, two positive feedback loops in this network motif govern three bistable switches, which in turn, give rise to three types of heterogeneous differentiated states, depending upon particular combinations of input signals. We provide three prototype models illustrating how to use this framework to explain experimental observations and make specific testable predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The process in which several types of T helper cells are generated simultaneously to mount complex immune responses upon pathogenic challenges can be highly regulated, and a simple signaling network motif can be responsible for generating all possible types of heterogeneous populations with respect to a pair of master regulators controlling CD4(+) T cell differentiation. The framework provides a mathematical basis for understanding the decision-making mechanisms of CD4(+) T cells, and it can be helpful for interpreting experimental results. Mathematical models based on the framework make specific testable predictions that may improve our understanding of this differentiation system.