Cargando…
EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
AIM: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). SAMPLES: Three samples...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3471598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S36196 |
_version_ | 1782246447971827712 |
---|---|
author | Cogo-Moreira, Hugo Ploubidis, George B de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de Jesus Mari, Jair Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira |
author_facet | Cogo-Moreira, Hugo Ploubidis, George B de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de Jesus Mari, Jair Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira |
author_sort | Cogo-Moreira, Hugo |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). SAMPLES: Three samples were used in this validation study. The first was composed of 335 students with an average age of 9.75 years (SD = 1.2) from Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State), Brazil, where the full spectrum of reading ability was assessed. The second two samples were from São Paulo city (São Paulo State), Brazil, where only children with reading difficulties were recruited. The first São Paulo sample was labeled “SP-screening” and had n = 617, with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD = 1.0), and the other sample was labeled “SP-trial” and had n = 235, with a mean age of 9.15 years (SD = 0.05). METHODS: Results were obtained from a latent class analysis LCA, in which two latent groups were obtained as solutions, and were correlated with direct reading measures. Also, students’ scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire tested the discriminant validation. RESULTS: Latent groups of readers underlying the EACOL predicted all direct reading measures, while the same latent groups showed no association with behavior and intelligence assessments, giving concurrent and discriminant validity to EACOL, respectively. CONCLUSION: EACOL is a reliable screening tool which can be used by a wide range of professionals for assessing reading skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3471598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34715982012-10-22 EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity Cogo-Moreira, Hugo Ploubidis, George B de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de Jesus Mari, Jair Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research AIM: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). SAMPLES: Three samples were used in this validation study. The first was composed of 335 students with an average age of 9.75 years (SD = 1.2) from Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State), Brazil, where the full spectrum of reading ability was assessed. The second two samples were from São Paulo city (São Paulo State), Brazil, where only children with reading difficulties were recruited. The first São Paulo sample was labeled “SP-screening” and had n = 617, with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD = 1.0), and the other sample was labeled “SP-trial” and had n = 235, with a mean age of 9.15 years (SD = 0.05). METHODS: Results were obtained from a latent class analysis LCA, in which two latent groups were obtained as solutions, and were correlated with direct reading measures. Also, students’ scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire tested the discriminant validation. RESULTS: Latent groups of readers underlying the EACOL predicted all direct reading measures, while the same latent groups showed no association with behavior and intelligence assessments, giving concurrent and discriminant validity to EACOL, respectively. CONCLUSION: EACOL is a reliable screening tool which can be used by a wide range of professionals for assessing reading skills. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3471598/ /pubmed/23091388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S36196 Text en © 2012 Cogo-Moreira et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cogo-Moreira, Hugo Ploubidis, George B de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de Jesus Mari, Jair Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
title | EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
title_full | EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
title_fullStr | EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
title_full_unstemmed | EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
title_short | EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
title_sort | eacol (scale of evaluation of reading competence by the teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3471598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S36196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cogomoreirahugo eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity AT ploubidisgeorgeb eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity AT deavilaclarareginabrandao eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity AT dejesusmarijair eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity AT pinheiroangelamariavieira eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity |