Cargando…

EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity

AIM: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). SAMPLES: Three samples...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cogo-Moreira, Hugo, Ploubidis, George B, de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão, de Jesus Mari, Jair, Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3471598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091388
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S36196
_version_ 1782246447971827712
author Cogo-Moreira, Hugo
Ploubidis, George B
de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão
de Jesus Mari, Jair
Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira
author_facet Cogo-Moreira, Hugo
Ploubidis, George B
de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão
de Jesus Mari, Jair
Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira
author_sort Cogo-Moreira, Hugo
collection PubMed
description AIM: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). SAMPLES: Three samples were used in this validation study. The first was composed of 335 students with an average age of 9.75 years (SD = 1.2) from Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State), Brazil, where the full spectrum of reading ability was assessed. The second two samples were from São Paulo city (São Paulo State), Brazil, where only children with reading difficulties were recruited. The first São Paulo sample was labeled “SP-screening” and had n = 617, with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD = 1.0), and the other sample was labeled “SP-trial” and had n = 235, with a mean age of 9.15 years (SD = 0.05). METHODS: Results were obtained from a latent class analysis LCA, in which two latent groups were obtained as solutions, and were correlated with direct reading measures. Also, students’ scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire tested the discriminant validation. RESULTS: Latent groups of readers underlying the EACOL predicted all direct reading measures, while the same latent groups showed no association with behavior and intelligence assessments, giving concurrent and discriminant validity to EACOL, respectively. CONCLUSION: EACOL is a reliable screening tool which can be used by a wide range of professionals for assessing reading skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3471598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34715982012-10-22 EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity Cogo-Moreira, Hugo Ploubidis, George B de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de Jesus Mari, Jair Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research AIM: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). SAMPLES: Three samples were used in this validation study. The first was composed of 335 students with an average age of 9.75 years (SD = 1.2) from Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State), Brazil, where the full spectrum of reading ability was assessed. The second two samples were from São Paulo city (São Paulo State), Brazil, where only children with reading difficulties were recruited. The first São Paulo sample was labeled “SP-screening” and had n = 617, with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD = 1.0), and the other sample was labeled “SP-trial” and had n = 235, with a mean age of 9.15 years (SD = 0.05). METHODS: Results were obtained from a latent class analysis LCA, in which two latent groups were obtained as solutions, and were correlated with direct reading measures. Also, students’ scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire tested the discriminant validation. RESULTS: Latent groups of readers underlying the EACOL predicted all direct reading measures, while the same latent groups showed no association with behavior and intelligence assessments, giving concurrent and discriminant validity to EACOL, respectively. CONCLUSION: EACOL is a reliable screening tool which can be used by a wide range of professionals for assessing reading skills. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3471598/ /pubmed/23091388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S36196 Text en © 2012 Cogo-Moreira et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cogo-Moreira, Hugo
Ploubidis, George B
de Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão
de Jesus Mari, Jair
Pinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira
EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
title EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
title_full EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
title_fullStr EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
title_full_unstemmed EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
title_short EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
title_sort eacol (scale of evaluation of reading competence by the teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3471598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091388
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S36196
work_keys_str_mv AT cogomoreirahugo eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity
AT ploubidisgeorgeb eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity
AT deavilaclarareginabrandao eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity
AT dejesusmarijair eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity
AT pinheiroangelamariavieira eacolscaleofevaluationofreadingcompetencebytheteacherevidenceofconcurrentanddiscriminantvalidity