Cargando…
Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
BACKGROUND: Gene-set enrichment analyses (GEA or GSEA) are commonly used for biological characterization of an experimental gene-set. This is done by finding known functional categories, such as pathways or Gene Ontology terms, that are over-represented in the experimental set; the assessment is bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22966941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-226 |
_version_ | 1782250721736916992 |
---|---|
author | Alexeyenko, Andrey Lee, Woojoo Pernemalm, Maria Guegan, Justin Dessen, Philippe Lazar, Vladimir Lehtiö, Janne Pawitan, Yudi |
author_facet | Alexeyenko, Andrey Lee, Woojoo Pernemalm, Maria Guegan, Justin Dessen, Philippe Lazar, Vladimir Lehtiö, Janne Pawitan, Yudi |
author_sort | Alexeyenko, Andrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene-set enrichment analyses (GEA or GSEA) are commonly used for biological characterization of an experimental gene-set. This is done by finding known functional categories, such as pathways or Gene Ontology terms, that are over-represented in the experimental set; the assessment is based on an overlap statistic. Rich biological information in terms of gene interaction network is now widely available, but this topological information is not used by GEA, so there is a need for methods that exploit this type of information in high-throughput data analysis. RESULTS: We developed a method of network enrichment analysis (NEA) that extends the overlap statistic in GEA to network links between genes in the experimental set and those in the functional categories. For the crucial step in statistical inference, we developed a fast network randomization algorithm in order to obtain the distribution of any network statistic under the null hypothesis of no association between an experimental gene-set and a functional category. We illustrate the NEA method using gene and protein expression data from a lung cancer study. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the NEA method is more powerful than the traditional GEA, primarily because the relationships between gene sets were more strongly captured by network connectivity rather than by simple overlaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3505158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35051582012-11-29 Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks Alexeyenko, Andrey Lee, Woojoo Pernemalm, Maria Guegan, Justin Dessen, Philippe Lazar, Vladimir Lehtiö, Janne Pawitan, Yudi BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Gene-set enrichment analyses (GEA or GSEA) are commonly used for biological characterization of an experimental gene-set. This is done by finding known functional categories, such as pathways or Gene Ontology terms, that are over-represented in the experimental set; the assessment is based on an overlap statistic. Rich biological information in terms of gene interaction network is now widely available, but this topological information is not used by GEA, so there is a need for methods that exploit this type of information in high-throughput data analysis. RESULTS: We developed a method of network enrichment analysis (NEA) that extends the overlap statistic in GEA to network links between genes in the experimental set and those in the functional categories. For the crucial step in statistical inference, we developed a fast network randomization algorithm in order to obtain the distribution of any network statistic under the null hypothesis of no association between an experimental gene-set and a functional category. We illustrate the NEA method using gene and protein expression data from a lung cancer study. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the NEA method is more powerful than the traditional GEA, primarily because the relationships between gene sets were more strongly captured by network connectivity rather than by simple overlaps. BioMed Central 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3505158/ /pubmed/22966941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-226 Text en Copyright ©2012 Alexeyenko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Alexeyenko, Andrey Lee, Woojoo Pernemalm, Maria Guegan, Justin Dessen, Philippe Lazar, Vladimir Lehtiö, Janne Pawitan, Yudi Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
title | Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
title_full | Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
title_fullStr | Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
title_short | Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
title_sort | network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22966941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexeyenkoandrey networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT leewoojoo networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT pernemalmmaria networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT gueganjustin networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT dessenphilippe networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT lazarvladimir networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT lehtiojanne networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks AT pawitanyudi networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks |