Cargando…
Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence
BACKGROUND: At present, what students read after an outpatient encounter is largely left up to them. Our objective was to evaluate the education efficacy of a clinical education model in which the student moves through a sequence that includes immediately reinforcing their learning using a specifica...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-70 |
_version_ | 1782252392516943872 |
---|---|
author | Pusic, Martin V MacDonald, Wendy A Eisman, Harley O Black, John B |
author_facet | Pusic, Martin V MacDonald, Wendy A Eisman, Harley O Black, John B |
author_sort | Pusic, Martin V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: At present, what students read after an outpatient encounter is largely left up to them. Our objective was to evaluate the education efficacy of a clinical education model in which the student moves through a sequence that includes immediately reinforcing their learning using a specifically designed computer tutorial. METHODS: Prior to a 14-day Pediatric Emergency rotation, medical students completed pre-tests for two common pediatric topics: Oral Rehydration Solutions (ORS) and Fever Without Source (FWS). After encountering a patient with either FWS or a patient needing ORS, the student logged into a computer that randomly assigned them to either a) completing a relevant computer tutorial (e.g. FWS patient + FWS tutorial = “in sequence”) or b) completing the non-relevant tutorial (e.g. FWS patient + ORS tutorial = “out of sequence”). At the end of their rotation, they were tested again on both topics. Our main outcome was post-test scores on a given tutorial topic, contrasted by whether done in- or out-of-sequence. RESULTS: Ninety-two students completed the study protocol with 41 in the ‘in sequence’ group. Pre-test scores did not differ significantly. Overall, doing a computer tutorial in sequence resulted in significantly greater post-test scores (z-score 1.1 (SD 0.70) in sequence vs. 0.52 (1.1) out-of-sequence; 95% CI for difference +0.16, +0.93). Students spent longer on the tutorials when they were done in sequence (12.1 min (SD 7.3) vs. 10.5 (6.5)) though the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI diff: -1.2 min, +4.5). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient learning frameworks could be structured to take best advantage of the heightened learning potential created by patient encounters. We propose the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence as a framework for organizing learning in outpatient clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3517358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35173582012-12-08 Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence Pusic, Martin V MacDonald, Wendy A Eisman, Harley O Black, John B BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: At present, what students read after an outpatient encounter is largely left up to them. Our objective was to evaluate the education efficacy of a clinical education model in which the student moves through a sequence that includes immediately reinforcing their learning using a specifically designed computer tutorial. METHODS: Prior to a 14-day Pediatric Emergency rotation, medical students completed pre-tests for two common pediatric topics: Oral Rehydration Solutions (ORS) and Fever Without Source (FWS). After encountering a patient with either FWS or a patient needing ORS, the student logged into a computer that randomly assigned them to either a) completing a relevant computer tutorial (e.g. FWS patient + FWS tutorial = “in sequence”) or b) completing the non-relevant tutorial (e.g. FWS patient + ORS tutorial = “out of sequence”). At the end of their rotation, they were tested again on both topics. Our main outcome was post-test scores on a given tutorial topic, contrasted by whether done in- or out-of-sequence. RESULTS: Ninety-two students completed the study protocol with 41 in the ‘in sequence’ group. Pre-test scores did not differ significantly. Overall, doing a computer tutorial in sequence resulted in significantly greater post-test scores (z-score 1.1 (SD 0.70) in sequence vs. 0.52 (1.1) out-of-sequence; 95% CI for difference +0.16, +0.93). Students spent longer on the tutorials when they were done in sequence (12.1 min (SD 7.3) vs. 10.5 (6.5)) though the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI diff: -1.2 min, +4.5). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient learning frameworks could be structured to take best advantage of the heightened learning potential created by patient encounters. We propose the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence as a framework for organizing learning in outpatient clinical settings. BioMed Central 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3517358/ /pubmed/22873635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-70 Text en Copyright ©2012 Pusic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pusic, Martin V MacDonald, Wendy A Eisman, Harley O Black, John B Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence |
title | Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence |
title_full | Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence |
title_fullStr | Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence |
title_full_unstemmed | Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence |
title_short | Reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence |
title_sort | reinforcing outpatient medical student learning using brief computer tutorials: the patient-teacher-tutorial sequence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-70 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pusicmartinv reinforcingoutpatientmedicalstudentlearningusingbriefcomputertutorialsthepatientteachertutorialsequence AT macdonaldwendya reinforcingoutpatientmedicalstudentlearningusingbriefcomputertutorialsthepatientteachertutorialsequence AT eismanharleyo reinforcingoutpatientmedicalstudentlearningusingbriefcomputertutorialsthepatientteachertutorialsequence AT blackjohnb reinforcingoutpatientmedicalstudentlearningusingbriefcomputertutorialsthepatientteachertutorialsequence |