Cargando…
Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
BACKGROUND: Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-26 |
_version_ | 1782253556759265280 |
---|---|
author | Killam, Laura A Montgomery, Phyllis Raymond, June M Mossey, Sharolyn Timmermans, Katherine E Binette, Janet |
author_facet | Killam, Laura A Montgomery, Phyllis Raymond, June M Mossey, Sharolyn Timmermans, Katherine E Binette, Janet |
author_sort | Killam, Laura A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment. METHODS: Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted 43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Q-analysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints yielding discrete and consensus perspectives. RESULTS: A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus perspective, labelled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Non-patient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second site. CONCLUSIONS: Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patient-centered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in the clinical learning environment. In an effort to eradicate compromised safety associated with learning in the clinical milieu, students and educators must embody the ontological, epistemological and praxis fundamentals of nursing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3526422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35264222012-12-20 Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology Killam, Laura A Montgomery, Phyllis Raymond, June M Mossey, Sharolyn Timmermans, Katherine E Binette, Janet BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment. METHODS: Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted 43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Q-analysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints yielding discrete and consensus perspectives. RESULTS: A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus perspective, labelled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Non-patient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second site. CONCLUSIONS: Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patient-centered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in the clinical learning environment. In an effort to eradicate compromised safety associated with learning in the clinical milieu, students and educators must embody the ontological, epistemological and praxis fundamentals of nursing. BioMed Central 2012-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3526422/ /pubmed/23181662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-26 Text en Copyright ©2012 Killam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Killam, Laura A Montgomery, Phyllis Raymond, June M Mossey, Sharolyn Timmermans, Katherine E Binette, Janet Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology |
title | Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology |
title_full | Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology |
title_fullStr | Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology |
title_short | Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology |
title_sort | unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: q methodology |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT killamlauraa unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology AT montgomeryphyllis unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology AT raymondjunem unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology AT mosseysharolyn unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology AT timmermanskatherinee unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology AT binettejanet unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology |