Cargando…

Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology

BACKGROUND: Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killam, Laura A, Montgomery, Phyllis, Raymond, June M, Mossey, Sharolyn, Timmermans, Katherine E, Binette, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-26
_version_ 1782253556759265280
author Killam, Laura A
Montgomery, Phyllis
Raymond, June M
Mossey, Sharolyn
Timmermans, Katherine E
Binette, Janet
author_facet Killam, Laura A
Montgomery, Phyllis
Raymond, June M
Mossey, Sharolyn
Timmermans, Katherine E
Binette, Janet
author_sort Killam, Laura A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment. METHODS: Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted 43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Q-analysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints yielding discrete and consensus perspectives. RESULTS: A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus perspective, labelled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Non-patient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second site. CONCLUSIONS: Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patient-centered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in the clinical learning environment. In an effort to eradicate compromised safety associated with learning in the clinical milieu, students and educators must embody the ontological, epistemological and praxis fundamentals of nursing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3526422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35264222012-12-20 Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology Killam, Laura A Montgomery, Phyllis Raymond, June M Mossey, Sharolyn Timmermans, Katherine E Binette, Janet BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment. METHODS: Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted 43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Q-analysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints yielding discrete and consensus perspectives. RESULTS: A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus perspective, labelled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Non-patient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second site. CONCLUSIONS: Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patient-centered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in the clinical learning environment. In an effort to eradicate compromised safety associated with learning in the clinical milieu, students and educators must embody the ontological, epistemological and praxis fundamentals of nursing. BioMed Central 2012-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3526422/ /pubmed/23181662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-26 Text en Copyright ©2012 Killam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Killam, Laura A
Montgomery, Phyllis
Raymond, June M
Mossey, Sharolyn
Timmermans, Katherine E
Binette, Janet
Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
title Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
title_full Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
title_fullStr Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
title_full_unstemmed Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
title_short Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
title_sort unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: q methodology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-26
work_keys_str_mv AT killamlauraa unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology
AT montgomeryphyllis unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology
AT raymondjunem unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology
AT mosseysharolyn unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology
AT timmermanskatherinee unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology
AT binettejanet unsafeclinicalpracticesasperceivedbyfinalyearbaccalaureatenursingstudentsqmethodology