Cargando…

A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD

BACKGROUND: Glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for treatment of COPD. This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily (OD) and twice-daily (BID) glycopyrronium bromide regimens, using a novel model-based approach, in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arievich, Helen, Overend, Tim, Renard, Didier, Gibbs, Michael, Alagappan, Vijay, Looby, Michael, Banerji, Donald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23217058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-74
_version_ 1782253835771707392
author Arievich, Helen
Overend, Tim
Renard, Didier
Gibbs, Michael
Alagappan, Vijay
Looby, Michael
Banerji, Donald
author_facet Arievich, Helen
Overend, Tim
Renard, Didier
Gibbs, Michael
Alagappan, Vijay
Looby, Michael
Banerji, Donald
author_sort Arievich, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for treatment of COPD. This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily (OD) and twice-daily (BID) glycopyrronium bromide regimens, using a novel model-based approach, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial with an eight-treatment, two-period, balanced incomplete block design. Patients (smoking history ≥10 pack-years, post-bronchodilator FEV(1) ≥30% and <80% predicted, FEV(1)/FVC <0.7) were randomized to one of 16 independent sequences for 28 days. Primary endpoint: mean trough FEV(1) at Day 28. RESULTS: 385 patients (mean age 61.2 years; mean post-bronchodilator FEV(1) 53% predicted) were randomized; 88.6% completed. All OD and BID dosing regimens produced dose-dependent bronchodilation; at Day 28, increases in mean trough FEV(1) versus placebo were statistically significant for all regimens, ranging from 51 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 12.5 μg OD) to 160 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg BID). Pharmacodynamic steady-state was reached by Day 7. There was a small separation (≤37 mL) between BID and OD dose–response curves for mean trough FEV(1) at steady-state in favour of BID dosing. Over 24 hours, separation between OD and BID regimens was even smaller (FEV(1) AUC(0-24h) maximum difference for equivalent daily dose regimens: 8 mL). Dose–response results for FEV(1) at 12 hours, FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) and FEV(1) AUC(0-4h) at steady-state showed OD regimens provided greater improvement over placebo than BID regimens for total daily doses of 25 μg, 50 μg and 100 μg, while the reverse was true for OD versus BID regimens from 12–24 hours. The 12.5 μg BID dose produced a marginally higher improvement in trough FEV(1) versus placebo than 50 μg OD, however, the response at 12 hours over placebo was suboptimal (74 mL). Glycopyrronium bromide was safe and well tolerated at all doses. CONCLUSIONS: Glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD provides significant bronchodilation over a 24 hour period, and in terms of FEV(1) AUC(0-24h) is not significantly different than the same total daily dose administered BID. Importantly, OD dosing may confer better patient adherence. The results are consistent with previous glycopyrronium bromide studies and support once-daily dosing of glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01119950
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3528484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35284842013-01-03 A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD Arievich, Helen Overend, Tim Renard, Didier Gibbs, Michael Alagappan, Vijay Looby, Michael Banerji, Donald BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for treatment of COPD. This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily (OD) and twice-daily (BID) glycopyrronium bromide regimens, using a novel model-based approach, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial with an eight-treatment, two-period, balanced incomplete block design. Patients (smoking history ≥10 pack-years, post-bronchodilator FEV(1) ≥30% and <80% predicted, FEV(1)/FVC <0.7) were randomized to one of 16 independent sequences for 28 days. Primary endpoint: mean trough FEV(1) at Day 28. RESULTS: 385 patients (mean age 61.2 years; mean post-bronchodilator FEV(1) 53% predicted) were randomized; 88.6% completed. All OD and BID dosing regimens produced dose-dependent bronchodilation; at Day 28, increases in mean trough FEV(1) versus placebo were statistically significant for all regimens, ranging from 51 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 12.5 μg OD) to 160 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg BID). Pharmacodynamic steady-state was reached by Day 7. There was a small separation (≤37 mL) between BID and OD dose–response curves for mean trough FEV(1) at steady-state in favour of BID dosing. Over 24 hours, separation between OD and BID regimens was even smaller (FEV(1) AUC(0-24h) maximum difference for equivalent daily dose regimens: 8 mL). Dose–response results for FEV(1) at 12 hours, FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) and FEV(1) AUC(0-4h) at steady-state showed OD regimens provided greater improvement over placebo than BID regimens for total daily doses of 25 μg, 50 μg and 100 μg, while the reverse was true for OD versus BID regimens from 12–24 hours. The 12.5 μg BID dose produced a marginally higher improvement in trough FEV(1) versus placebo than 50 μg OD, however, the response at 12 hours over placebo was suboptimal (74 mL). Glycopyrronium bromide was safe and well tolerated at all doses. CONCLUSIONS: Glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD provides significant bronchodilation over a 24 hour period, and in terms of FEV(1) AUC(0-24h) is not significantly different than the same total daily dose administered BID. Importantly, OD dosing may confer better patient adherence. The results are consistent with previous glycopyrronium bromide studies and support once-daily dosing of glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01119950 BioMed Central 2012-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3528484/ /pubmed/23217058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-74 Text en Copyright ©2012 Arievich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arievich, Helen
Overend, Tim
Renard, Didier
Gibbs, Michael
Alagappan, Vijay
Looby, Michael
Banerji, Donald
A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD
title A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD
title_full A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD
title_fullStr A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD
title_full_unstemmed A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD
title_short A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD
title_sort novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in copd
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23217058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-74
work_keys_str_mv AT arievichhelen anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT overendtim anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT renarddidier anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT gibbsmichael anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT alagappanvijay anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT loobymichael anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT banerjidonald anovelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT arievichhelen novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT overendtim novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT renarddidier novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT gibbsmichael novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT alagappanvijay novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT loobymichael novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd
AT banerjidonald novelmodelbasedapproachfordosedeterminationofglycopyrroniumbromideincopd