Cargando…
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23202033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s121014022 |
_version_ | 1782255928321507328 |
---|---|
author | Subari, Norazian Saleh, Junita Mohamad Shakaff, Ali Yeon Md Zakaria, Ammar |
author_facet | Subari, Norazian Saleh, Junita Mohamad Shakaff, Ali Yeon Md Zakaria, Ammar |
author_sort | Subari, Norazian |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang honey were obtained throughout peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera, Indonesia. Various concentrations of two types of sugar solution (beet and cane sugar) were used in this investigation to create honey samples of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% adulteration concentrations. Honey data extracted from an electronic nose (e-nose) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were gathered, analyzed and compared based on fusion methods. Visual observation of classification plots revealed that the PCA approach able to distinct pure and adulterated honey samples better than the LDA technique. Overall, the validated classification results based on FTIR data (88.0%) gave higher classification accuracy than e-nose data (76.5%) using the LDA technique. Honey classification based on normalized low-level and intermediate-level FTIR and e-nose fusion data scored classification accuracies of 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively using the Stepwise LDA method. The results suggested that pure and adulterated honey samples were better classified using FTIR and e-nose fusion data than single modality data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3545604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35456042013-01-23 A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification Subari, Norazian Saleh, Junita Mohamad Shakaff, Ali Yeon Md Zakaria, Ammar Sensors (Basel) Article This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang honey were obtained throughout peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera, Indonesia. Various concentrations of two types of sugar solution (beet and cane sugar) were used in this investigation to create honey samples of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% adulteration concentrations. Honey data extracted from an electronic nose (e-nose) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were gathered, analyzed and compared based on fusion methods. Visual observation of classification plots revealed that the PCA approach able to distinct pure and adulterated honey samples better than the LDA technique. Overall, the validated classification results based on FTIR data (88.0%) gave higher classification accuracy than e-nose data (76.5%) using the LDA technique. Honey classification based on normalized low-level and intermediate-level FTIR and e-nose fusion data scored classification accuracies of 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively using the Stepwise LDA method. The results suggested that pure and adulterated honey samples were better classified using FTIR and e-nose fusion data than single modality data. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3545604/ /pubmed/23202033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s121014022 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Subari, Norazian Saleh, Junita Mohamad Shakaff, Ali Yeon Md Zakaria, Ammar A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title | A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_full | A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_fullStr | A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_short | A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_sort | hybrid sensing approach for pure and adulterated honey classification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23202033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s121014022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subarinorazian ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT salehjunitamohamad ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT shakaffaliyeonmd ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT zakariaammar ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT subarinorazian hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT salehjunitamohamad hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT shakaffaliyeonmd hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT zakariaammar hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification |