Cargando…
On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental me...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 |
_version_ | 1782258464813219840 |
---|---|
author | Kastritis, Panagiotis L. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. |
author_facet | Kastritis, Panagiotis L. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. |
author_sort | Kastritis, Panagiotis L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental measure that determines whether an interaction will be formed in solution or not. Predicting binding affinity from structural models has been a matter of active research for more than 40 years because of its fundamental role in drug development. However, all available approaches are incapable of predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein complexes from coordinates alone. Here, we examine both theoretical and experimental limitations that complicate the derivation of structure–affinity relationships. Most work so far has concentrated on binary interactions. Systems of increased complexity are far from being understood. The main physico-chemical measure that relates to binding affinity is the buried surface area, but it does not hold for flexible complexes. For the latter, there must be a significant entropic contribution that will have to be approximated in the future. We foresee that any theoretical modelling of these interactions will have to follow an integrative approach considering the biology, chemistry and physics that underlie protein–protein recognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3565702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35657022013-02-07 On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact Kastritis, Panagiotis L. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. J R Soc Interface Review Articles Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental measure that determines whether an interaction will be formed in solution or not. Predicting binding affinity from structural models has been a matter of active research for more than 40 years because of its fundamental role in drug development. However, all available approaches are incapable of predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein complexes from coordinates alone. Here, we examine both theoretical and experimental limitations that complicate the derivation of structure–affinity relationships. Most work so far has concentrated on binary interactions. Systems of increased complexity are far from being understood. The main physico-chemical measure that relates to binding affinity is the buried surface area, but it does not hold for flexible complexes. For the latter, there must be a significant entropic contribution that will have to be approximated in the future. We foresee that any theoretical modelling of these interactions will have to follow an integrative approach considering the biology, chemistry and physics that underlie protein–protein recognition. The Royal Society 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3565702/ /pubmed/23235262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ © 2012 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Kastritis, Panagiotis L. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
title | On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
title_full | On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
title_fullStr | On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
title_full_unstemmed | On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
title_short | On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
title_sort | on the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kastritispanagiotisl onthebindingaffinityofmacromolecularinteractionsdaringtoaskwhyproteinsinteract AT bonvinalexandremjj onthebindingaffinityofmacromolecularinteractionsdaringtoaskwhyproteinsinteract |