Cargando…

On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact

Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kastritis, Panagiotis L., Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835
_version_ 1782258464813219840
author Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
author_facet Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
author_sort Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
collection PubMed
description Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental measure that determines whether an interaction will be formed in solution or not. Predicting binding affinity from structural models has been a matter of active research for more than 40 years because of its fundamental role in drug development. However, all available approaches are incapable of predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein complexes from coordinates alone. Here, we examine both theoretical and experimental limitations that complicate the derivation of structure–affinity relationships. Most work so far has concentrated on binary interactions. Systems of increased complexity are far from being understood. The main physico-chemical measure that relates to binding affinity is the buried surface area, but it does not hold for flexible complexes. For the latter, there must be a significant entropic contribution that will have to be approximated in the future. We foresee that any theoretical modelling of these interactions will have to follow an integrative approach considering the biology, chemistry and physics that underlie protein–protein recognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3565702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35657022013-02-07 On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact Kastritis, Panagiotis L. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. J R Soc Interface Review Articles Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental measure that determines whether an interaction will be formed in solution or not. Predicting binding affinity from structural models has been a matter of active research for more than 40 years because of its fundamental role in drug development. However, all available approaches are incapable of predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein complexes from coordinates alone. Here, we examine both theoretical and experimental limitations that complicate the derivation of structure–affinity relationships. Most work so far has concentrated on binary interactions. Systems of increased complexity are far from being understood. The main physico-chemical measure that relates to binding affinity is the buried surface area, but it does not hold for flexible complexes. For the latter, there must be a significant entropic contribution that will have to be approximated in the future. We foresee that any theoretical modelling of these interactions will have to follow an integrative approach considering the biology, chemistry and physics that underlie protein–protein recognition. The Royal Society 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3565702/ /pubmed/23235262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ © 2012 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
title On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
title_full On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
title_fullStr On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
title_full_unstemmed On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
title_short On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
title_sort on the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835
work_keys_str_mv AT kastritispanagiotisl onthebindingaffinityofmacromolecularinteractionsdaringtoaskwhyproteinsinteract
AT bonvinalexandremjj onthebindingaffinityofmacromolecularinteractionsdaringtoaskwhyproteinsinteract