Cargando…

An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells

Alterations in checkpoint and DNA repair pathways may provide adaptive mechanisms contributing to acquired drug resistance. Here, we investigated the levels of proteins mediating DNA damage signaling and -repair in RPMI8226 multiple myeloma cells and its Melphalan-resistant derivative 8226-LR5. We o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sousa, Mirta M. L., Zub, Kamila Anna, Aas, Per Arne, Hanssen-Bauer, Audun, Demirovic, Aida, Sarno, Antonio, Tian, Erming, Liabakk, Nina B., Slupphaug, Geir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055493
_version_ 1782258555177402368
author Sousa, Mirta M. L.
Zub, Kamila Anna
Aas, Per Arne
Hanssen-Bauer, Audun
Demirovic, Aida
Sarno, Antonio
Tian, Erming
Liabakk, Nina B.
Slupphaug, Geir
author_facet Sousa, Mirta M. L.
Zub, Kamila Anna
Aas, Per Arne
Hanssen-Bauer, Audun
Demirovic, Aida
Sarno, Antonio
Tian, Erming
Liabakk, Nina B.
Slupphaug, Geir
author_sort Sousa, Mirta M. L.
collection PubMed
description Alterations in checkpoint and DNA repair pathways may provide adaptive mechanisms contributing to acquired drug resistance. Here, we investigated the levels of proteins mediating DNA damage signaling and -repair in RPMI8226 multiple myeloma cells and its Melphalan-resistant derivative 8226-LR5. We observed markedly reduced steady-state levels of DNA glycosylases UNG2, NEIL1 and MPG in the resistant cells and cross-resistance to agents inducing their respective DNA base lesions. Conversely, repair of alkali-labile sites was apparently enhanced in the resistant cells, as substantiated by alkaline comet assay, autoribosylation of PARP-1, and increased sensitivity to PARP-1 inhibition by 4-AN or KU58684. Reduced base-excision and enhanced single-strand break repair would both contribute to the observed reduction in genomic alkali-labile sites, which could jeopardize productive processing of the more cytotoxic Melphalan-induced interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs). Furthermore, we found a marked upregulation of proteins in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair, likely contributing to the observed increase in DSB repair kinetics in the resistant cells. Finally, we observed apparent upregulation of ATR-signaling and downregulation of ATM-signaling in the resistant cells. This was accompanied by markedly increased sensitivity towards Melphalan in the presence of ATR-, DNA-PK, or CHK1/2 inhibitors whereas no sensitizing effect was observed subsequent to ATM inhibition, suggesting that replication blocking lesions are primary triggers of the DNA damage response in the Melphalan resistant cells. In conclusion, Melphalan resistance is apparently contributed by modulation of the DNA damage response at multiple levels, including downregulation of specific repair pathways to avoid repair intermediates that could impair efficient processing of cytotoxic ICLs and ICL-induced DSBs. This study has revealed several novel candidate biomarkers for Melphalan sensitivity that will be included in targeted quantitation studies in larger patient cohorts to validate their value in prognosis as well as targets for replacement- or adjuvant therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3566207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35662072013-02-12 An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells Sousa, Mirta M. L. Zub, Kamila Anna Aas, Per Arne Hanssen-Bauer, Audun Demirovic, Aida Sarno, Antonio Tian, Erming Liabakk, Nina B. Slupphaug, Geir PLoS One Research Article Alterations in checkpoint and DNA repair pathways may provide adaptive mechanisms contributing to acquired drug resistance. Here, we investigated the levels of proteins mediating DNA damage signaling and -repair in RPMI8226 multiple myeloma cells and its Melphalan-resistant derivative 8226-LR5. We observed markedly reduced steady-state levels of DNA glycosylases UNG2, NEIL1 and MPG in the resistant cells and cross-resistance to agents inducing their respective DNA base lesions. Conversely, repair of alkali-labile sites was apparently enhanced in the resistant cells, as substantiated by alkaline comet assay, autoribosylation of PARP-1, and increased sensitivity to PARP-1 inhibition by 4-AN or KU58684. Reduced base-excision and enhanced single-strand break repair would both contribute to the observed reduction in genomic alkali-labile sites, which could jeopardize productive processing of the more cytotoxic Melphalan-induced interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs). Furthermore, we found a marked upregulation of proteins in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair, likely contributing to the observed increase in DSB repair kinetics in the resistant cells. Finally, we observed apparent upregulation of ATR-signaling and downregulation of ATM-signaling in the resistant cells. This was accompanied by markedly increased sensitivity towards Melphalan in the presence of ATR-, DNA-PK, or CHK1/2 inhibitors whereas no sensitizing effect was observed subsequent to ATM inhibition, suggesting that replication blocking lesions are primary triggers of the DNA damage response in the Melphalan resistant cells. In conclusion, Melphalan resistance is apparently contributed by modulation of the DNA damage response at multiple levels, including downregulation of specific repair pathways to avoid repair intermediates that could impair efficient processing of cytotoxic ICLs and ICL-induced DSBs. This study has revealed several novel candidate biomarkers for Melphalan sensitivity that will be included in targeted quantitation studies in larger patient cohorts to validate their value in prognosis as well as targets for replacement- or adjuvant therapies. Public Library of Science 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3566207/ /pubmed/23405159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055493 Text en © 2013 Sousa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sousa, Mirta M. L.
Zub, Kamila Anna
Aas, Per Arne
Hanssen-Bauer, Audun
Demirovic, Aida
Sarno, Antonio
Tian, Erming
Liabakk, Nina B.
Slupphaug, Geir
An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells
title An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells
title_full An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells
title_fullStr An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells
title_full_unstemmed An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells
title_short An Inverse Switch in DNA Base Excision and Strand Break Repair Contributes to Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Cells
title_sort inverse switch in dna base excision and strand break repair contributes to melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055493
work_keys_str_mv AT sousamirtaml aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT zubkamilaanna aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT aasperarne aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT hanssenbaueraudun aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT demirovicaida aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT sarnoantonio aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT tianerming aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT liabakkninab aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT slupphauggeir aninverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT sousamirtaml inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT zubkamilaanna inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT aasperarne inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT hanssenbaueraudun inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT demirovicaida inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT sarnoantonio inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT tianerming inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT liabakkninab inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells
AT slupphauggeir inverseswitchindnabaseexcisionandstrandbreakrepaircontributestomelphalanresistanceinmultiplemyelomacells