Cargando…

Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study

BACKGROUND: 10-15% of students struggle at some point in their medicine course. Risk factors include weaker academic qualifications, male gender, mental illness, UK ethnic minority status, and poor study skills. Recent research on an undergraduate medicine course provided a toolkit to aid early iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrud, Paul, Yates, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-124
_version_ 1782258730883088384
author Garrud, Paul
Yates, Janet
author_facet Garrud, Paul
Yates, Janet
author_sort Garrud, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 10-15% of students struggle at some point in their medicine course. Risk factors include weaker academic qualifications, male gender, mental illness, UK ethnic minority status, and poor study skills. Recent research on an undergraduate medicine course provided a toolkit to aid early identification of students likely to struggle, who can be targeted by established support and study interventions. The present study sought to extend this work by investigating the number and characteristics of strugglers on a graduate-entry medicine (GEM) programme. METHODS: A retrospective study of four GEM entry cohorts (2003–6) was carried out. All students who had demonstrated unsatisfactory progress or left prematurely were included. Any information about academic, administrative, personal, or social difficulties, were extracted from their course progress files into a customised database and examined. RESULTS: 362 students were admitted to the course, and 53 (14.6%) were identified for the study, of whom 15 (4.1%) did not complete the course. Students in the study group differed from the others in having a higher proportion of 2ii first degrees, and scoring less well on GAMSAT, an aptitude test used for admission. Within the study group, it proved possible to categorise students into the same groups previously reported (struggler throughout, pre-clinical struggler, clinical struggler, health-related struggler, borderline struggler) and to identify the majority using a number of flags for early difficulties. These flags included: missed attendance, unsatisfactory attitude or behaviour, health problems, social/family problems, failure to complete immunity status checks, and attendance at academic progress committee. CONCLUSIONS: Problems encountered in a graduate-entry medicine course were comparable to those reported in a corresponding undergraduate programme. A toolkit of academic and non-academic flags of difficulty can be used for early identification of many who will struggle, and could be used to target appropriate support and interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3567936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35679362013-02-12 Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study Garrud, Paul Yates, Janet BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: 10-15% of students struggle at some point in their medicine course. Risk factors include weaker academic qualifications, male gender, mental illness, UK ethnic minority status, and poor study skills. Recent research on an undergraduate medicine course provided a toolkit to aid early identification of students likely to struggle, who can be targeted by established support and study interventions. The present study sought to extend this work by investigating the number and characteristics of strugglers on a graduate-entry medicine (GEM) programme. METHODS: A retrospective study of four GEM entry cohorts (2003–6) was carried out. All students who had demonstrated unsatisfactory progress or left prematurely were included. Any information about academic, administrative, personal, or social difficulties, were extracted from their course progress files into a customised database and examined. RESULTS: 362 students were admitted to the course, and 53 (14.6%) were identified for the study, of whom 15 (4.1%) did not complete the course. Students in the study group differed from the others in having a higher proportion of 2ii first degrees, and scoring less well on GAMSAT, an aptitude test used for admission. Within the study group, it proved possible to categorise students into the same groups previously reported (struggler throughout, pre-clinical struggler, clinical struggler, health-related struggler, borderline struggler) and to identify the majority using a number of flags for early difficulties. These flags included: missed attendance, unsatisfactory attitude or behaviour, health problems, social/family problems, failure to complete immunity status checks, and attendance at academic progress committee. CONCLUSIONS: Problems encountered in a graduate-entry medicine course were comparable to those reported in a corresponding undergraduate programme. A toolkit of academic and non-academic flags of difficulty can be used for early identification of many who will struggle, and could be used to target appropriate support and interventions. BioMed Central 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3567936/ /pubmed/23249471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-124 Text en Copyright ©2012 Garrud and Yates; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garrud, Paul
Yates, Janet
Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study
title Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study
title_full Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study
title_fullStr Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study
title_full_unstemmed Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study
title_short Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study
title_sort profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at nottingham: a retrospective case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-124
work_keys_str_mv AT garrudpaul profilingstrugglersinagraduateentrymedicinecourseatnottinghamaretrospectivecasestudy
AT yatesjanet profilingstrugglersinagraduateentrymedicinecourseatnottinghamaretrospectivecasestudy