Cargando…

DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic signatures are highly cell type specific. Separation of distinct cell populations is therefore desirable for all epigenetic studies. However, to date little information is available on whether separation protocols might influence epigenetic and/or gene expression signatures an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenke, Andreas C., Postberg, Jan, Raine, Timothy, Nayak, Komal M., Molitor, Malte, Wirth, Stefan, Kaser, Arthur, Parkes, Miles, Heuschkel, Robert B., Orth, Valerie, Zilbauer, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055636
_version_ 1782258772195934208
author Jenke, Andreas C.
Postberg, Jan
Raine, Timothy
Nayak, Komal M.
Molitor, Malte
Wirth, Stefan
Kaser, Arthur
Parkes, Miles
Heuschkel, Robert B.
Orth, Valerie
Zilbauer, Matthias
author_facet Jenke, Andreas C.
Postberg, Jan
Raine, Timothy
Nayak, Komal M.
Molitor, Malte
Wirth, Stefan
Kaser, Arthur
Parkes, Miles
Heuschkel, Robert B.
Orth, Valerie
Zilbauer, Matthias
author_sort Jenke, Andreas C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epigenetic signatures are highly cell type specific. Separation of distinct cell populations is therefore desirable for all epigenetic studies. However, to date little information is available on whether separation protocols might influence epigenetic and/or gene expression signatures and hence might be less beneficial. We investigated the influence of two frequently used protocols to isolate intestinal epithelium cells (IECs) from 6 healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epithelial cells were isolated from small bowel (i.e. terminal ileum) biopsies using EDTA/DTT and enzymatic release followed by magnetic bead sorting via EPCAM labeled microbeads. Effects on gene/mRNA expression were analyzed using a real time PCR based expression array. DNA methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). RESULTS: While cell purity was >95% using both cell separation approaches, gene expression analysis revealed significantly higher mRNA levels of several inflammatory genes in EDTA/DTT when compared to enzymatically released cells. In contrast, DNA methylation of selected genes was less variable and only revealed subtle differences. Comparison of DNA methylation of the epithelial cell marker EPCAM in unseparated whole biopsy samples with separated epithelium (i.e. EPCAM positive and negative fraction) demonstrated significant differences in DNA methylation between all three tissue fractions indicating cell type specific methylation patterns can be masked in unseparated tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data highlight the importance of considering the potential effect of cell separation on gene expression as well as DNA methylation signatures. The decision to separate tissue samples will therefore depend on study design and specific separation protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3568120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35681202013-02-13 DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile Jenke, Andreas C. Postberg, Jan Raine, Timothy Nayak, Komal M. Molitor, Malte Wirth, Stefan Kaser, Arthur Parkes, Miles Heuschkel, Robert B. Orth, Valerie Zilbauer, Matthias PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Epigenetic signatures are highly cell type specific. Separation of distinct cell populations is therefore desirable for all epigenetic studies. However, to date little information is available on whether separation protocols might influence epigenetic and/or gene expression signatures and hence might be less beneficial. We investigated the influence of two frequently used protocols to isolate intestinal epithelium cells (IECs) from 6 healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epithelial cells were isolated from small bowel (i.e. terminal ileum) biopsies using EDTA/DTT and enzymatic release followed by magnetic bead sorting via EPCAM labeled microbeads. Effects on gene/mRNA expression were analyzed using a real time PCR based expression array. DNA methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). RESULTS: While cell purity was >95% using both cell separation approaches, gene expression analysis revealed significantly higher mRNA levels of several inflammatory genes in EDTA/DTT when compared to enzymatically released cells. In contrast, DNA methylation of selected genes was less variable and only revealed subtle differences. Comparison of DNA methylation of the epithelial cell marker EPCAM in unseparated whole biopsy samples with separated epithelium (i.e. EPCAM positive and negative fraction) demonstrated significant differences in DNA methylation between all three tissue fractions indicating cell type specific methylation patterns can be masked in unseparated tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data highlight the importance of considering the potential effect of cell separation on gene expression as well as DNA methylation signatures. The decision to separate tissue samples will therefore depend on study design and specific separation protocols. Public Library of Science 2013-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3568120/ /pubmed/23409010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055636 Text en © 2013 Jenke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jenke, Andreas C.
Postberg, Jan
Raine, Timothy
Nayak, Komal M.
Molitor, Malte
Wirth, Stefan
Kaser, Arthur
Parkes, Miles
Heuschkel, Robert B.
Orth, Valerie
Zilbauer, Matthias
DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile
title DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile
title_full DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile
title_fullStr DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile
title_full_unstemmed DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile
title_short DNA Methylation Analysis in the Intestinal Epithelium—Effect of Cell Separation on Gene Expression and Methylation Profile
title_sort dna methylation analysis in the intestinal epithelium—effect of cell separation on gene expression and methylation profile
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055636
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkeandreasc dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT postbergjan dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT rainetimothy dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT nayakkomalm dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT molitormalte dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT wirthstefan dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT kaserarthur dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT parkesmiles dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT heuschkelrobertb dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT orthvalerie dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile
AT zilbauermatthias dnamethylationanalysisintheintestinalepitheliumeffectofcellseparationongeneexpressionandmethylationprofile