Cargando…

How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis

Few studies in medical education have studied effect of quality of motivation on performance. Self-Determination Theory based on quality of motivation differentiates between Autonomous Motivation (AM) that originates within an individual and Controlled Motivation (CM) that originates from external s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, Th. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P., Croiset, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3
_version_ 1782258921705046016
author Kusurkar, R. A.
Ten Cate, Th. J.
Vos, C. M. P.
Westers, P.
Croiset, G.
author_facet Kusurkar, R. A.
Ten Cate, Th. J.
Vos, C. M. P.
Westers, P.
Croiset, G.
author_sort Kusurkar, R. A.
collection PubMed
description Few studies in medical education have studied effect of quality of motivation on performance. Self-Determination Theory based on quality of motivation differentiates between Autonomous Motivation (AM) that originates within an individual and Controlled Motivation (CM) that originates from external sources. To determine whether Relative Autonomous Motivation (RAM, a measure of the balance between AM and CM) affects academic performance through good study strategy and higher study effort and compare this model between subgroups: males and females; students selected via two different systems namely qualitative and weighted lottery selection. Data on motivation, study strategy and effort was collected from 383 medical students of VU University Medical Center Amsterdam and their academic performance results were obtained from the student administration. Structural Equation Modelling analysis technique was used to test a hypothesized model in which high RAM would positively affect Good Study Strategy (GSS) and study effort, which in turn would positively affect academic performance in the form of grade point averages. This model fit well with the data, Chi square = 1.095, df = 3, p = 0.778, RMSEA model fit = 0.000. This model also fitted well for all tested subgroups of students. Differences were found in the strength of relationships between the variables for the different subgroups as expected. In conclusion, RAM positively correlated with academic performance through deep strategy towards study and higher study effort. This model seems valid in medical education in subgroups such as males, females, students selected by qualitative and weighted lottery selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3569579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35695792013-02-14 How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis Kusurkar, R. A. Ten Cate, Th. J. Vos, C. M. P. Westers, P. Croiset, G. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Article Few studies in medical education have studied effect of quality of motivation on performance. Self-Determination Theory based on quality of motivation differentiates between Autonomous Motivation (AM) that originates within an individual and Controlled Motivation (CM) that originates from external sources. To determine whether Relative Autonomous Motivation (RAM, a measure of the balance between AM and CM) affects academic performance through good study strategy and higher study effort and compare this model between subgroups: males and females; students selected via two different systems namely qualitative and weighted lottery selection. Data on motivation, study strategy and effort was collected from 383 medical students of VU University Medical Center Amsterdam and their academic performance results were obtained from the student administration. Structural Equation Modelling analysis technique was used to test a hypothesized model in which high RAM would positively affect Good Study Strategy (GSS) and study effort, which in turn would positively affect academic performance in the form of grade point averages. This model fit well with the data, Chi square = 1.095, df = 3, p = 0.778, RMSEA model fit = 0.000. This model also fitted well for all tested subgroups of students. Differences were found in the strength of relationships between the variables for the different subgroups as expected. In conclusion, RAM positively correlated with academic performance through deep strategy towards study and higher study effort. This model seems valid in medical education in subgroups such as males, females, students selected by qualitative and weighted lottery selection. Springer Netherlands 2012-02-22 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3569579/ /pubmed/22354335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Kusurkar, R. A.
Ten Cate, Th. J.
Vos, C. M. P.
Westers, P.
Croiset, G.
How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
title How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
title_full How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
title_fullStr How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
title_full_unstemmed How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
title_short How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
title_sort how motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kusurkarra howmotivationaffectsacademicperformanceastructuralequationmodellinganalysis
AT tencatethj howmotivationaffectsacademicperformanceastructuralequationmodellinganalysis
AT voscmp howmotivationaffectsacademicperformanceastructuralequationmodellinganalysis
AT westersp howmotivationaffectsacademicperformanceastructuralequationmodellinganalysis
AT croisetg howmotivationaffectsacademicperformanceastructuralequationmodellinganalysis