Cargando…

Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation

Recent evidence has challenged the default assumption that all DNA-reactive alkylating agents exhibit a linear dose-response. Emerging evidence suggests that the model alkylating agents methyl- and ethylmethanesulfonate and methylnitrosourea (MNU) and ethylnitrosourea observe a nonlinear dose-respon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Adam D., Jenkins, Gareth J. S., Kaina, Bernd, Bodger, Owen G., Tomaszowski, Karl-Heinz, Lewis, Paul D., Doak, Shareen H., Johnson, George E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23288051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs341
_version_ 1782259799360012288
author Thomas, Adam D.
Jenkins, Gareth J. S.
Kaina, Bernd
Bodger, Owen G.
Tomaszowski, Karl-Heinz
Lewis, Paul D.
Doak, Shareen H.
Johnson, George E.
author_facet Thomas, Adam D.
Jenkins, Gareth J. S.
Kaina, Bernd
Bodger, Owen G.
Tomaszowski, Karl-Heinz
Lewis, Paul D.
Doak, Shareen H.
Johnson, George E.
author_sort Thomas, Adam D.
collection PubMed
description Recent evidence has challenged the default assumption that all DNA-reactive alkylating agents exhibit a linear dose-response. Emerging evidence suggests that the model alkylating agents methyl- and ethylmethanesulfonate and methylnitrosourea (MNU) and ethylnitrosourea observe a nonlinear dose-response with a no observed genotoxic effect level (NOGEL). Follow-up mechanistic studies are essential to understand the mechanism of cellular tolerance and biological relevance of such NOGELs. MNU is one of the most mutagenic simple alkylators. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of mutation induction, following low-dose MNU treatment, sets precedence for weaker mutagenic alkylating agents. Here, we tested MNU at 10-fold lower concentrations than a previous study and report a NOGEL of 0.0075 µg/ml (72.8nM) in human lymphoblastoid cells, quantified through the hypoxanthine (guanine) phosphoribosyltransferase assay (OECD 476). Mechanistic studies reveal that the NOGEL is dependent upon repair of O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)MeG) by the suicide enzyme O(6)MeG-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Inactivation of MGMT sensitizes cells to MNU-induced mutagenesis and shifts the NOGEL to the left on the dose axis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3576011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35760112013-02-19 Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation Thomas, Adam D. Jenkins, Gareth J. S. Kaina, Bernd Bodger, Owen G. Tomaszowski, Karl-Heinz Lewis, Paul D. Doak, Shareen H. Johnson, George E. Toxicol Sci Research Article Recent evidence has challenged the default assumption that all DNA-reactive alkylating agents exhibit a linear dose-response. Emerging evidence suggests that the model alkylating agents methyl- and ethylmethanesulfonate and methylnitrosourea (MNU) and ethylnitrosourea observe a nonlinear dose-response with a no observed genotoxic effect level (NOGEL). Follow-up mechanistic studies are essential to understand the mechanism of cellular tolerance and biological relevance of such NOGELs. MNU is one of the most mutagenic simple alkylators. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of mutation induction, following low-dose MNU treatment, sets precedence for weaker mutagenic alkylating agents. Here, we tested MNU at 10-fold lower concentrations than a previous study and report a NOGEL of 0.0075 µg/ml (72.8nM) in human lymphoblastoid cells, quantified through the hypoxanthine (guanine) phosphoribosyltransferase assay (OECD 476). Mechanistic studies reveal that the NOGEL is dependent upon repair of O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)MeG) by the suicide enzyme O(6)MeG-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Inactivation of MGMT sensitizes cells to MNU-induced mutagenesis and shifts the NOGEL to the left on the dose axis. Oxford University Press 2013-03 2013-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3576011/ /pubmed/23288051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs341 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, Adam D.
Jenkins, Gareth J. S.
Kaina, Bernd
Bodger, Owen G.
Tomaszowski, Karl-Heinz
Lewis, Paul D.
Doak, Shareen H.
Johnson, George E.
Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation
title Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation
title_full Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation
title_fullStr Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation
title_full_unstemmed Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation
title_short Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation
title_sort influence of dna repair on nonlinear dose-responses for mutation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23288051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs341
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasadamd influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT jenkinsgarethjs influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT kainabernd influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT bodgeroweng influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT tomaszowskikarlheinz influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT lewispauld influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT doakshareenh influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation
AT johnsongeorgee influenceofdnarepaironnonlineardoseresponsesformutation