Cargando…

Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL

BACKGROUND: Ciclosporin is used as an immunosuppressant in current clinical practice but recent research implies novel indications for the drug, such as neuro- and cardioprotection. The intravenous formulation currently on the market, Sandimmune(®) Injection (Sandimmune(®)), uses Cremophor(®) EL as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehinger, Karl Henrik Johannes, Hansson, Magnus Joakim, Sjövall, Fredrik, Elmér, Eskil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing AG 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23179472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-012-0029-x
_version_ 1782261284569350144
author Ehinger, Karl Henrik Johannes
Hansson, Magnus Joakim
Sjövall, Fredrik
Elmér, Eskil
author_facet Ehinger, Karl Henrik Johannes
Hansson, Magnus Joakim
Sjövall, Fredrik
Elmér, Eskil
author_sort Ehinger, Karl Henrik Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ciclosporin is used as an immunosuppressant in current clinical practice but recent research implies novel indications for the drug, such as neuro- and cardioprotection. The intravenous formulation currently on the market, Sandimmune(®) Injection (Sandimmune(®)), uses Cremophor(®) EL as emulsifying excipient. Cremophor(®) EL is known to cause hypersensitivity reactions in some patients, ranging from skin reactions to potentially fatal anaphylactic shock. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess if CicloMulsion(®), a Cremophor(®) EL-free lipid emulsion of ciclosporin for intravenous administration, is bioequivalent to Sandimmune(®), and the secondary objective was to compare the tolerability profiles of the two preparations. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, subject-blind, laboratory-blind, single-dose, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of two formulations of intravenous ciclosporin. Fifty-two healthy volunteer subjects were administered 5 mg/kg of each of the two formulations of ciclosporin as a 4-h intravenous infusion. The last blood sample was acquired 48 h after the end of the infusion. Bioequivalence assessments according to current guidelines were performed. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios for CicloMulsion(®)/Sandimmune(®) (90 % confidence interval [CI]) were 0.90 (0.88, 0.92) for AUC(0–last) (area under the blood concentration–time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration) and 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) for C(max) (maximum blood concentration). For all additional variables analysed, the 90 % CIs were also within the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. One anaphylactoid and one anaphylactic reaction, both classified as serious adverse events, were reported after treatment with Sandimmune(®). No serious adverse events were recorded after treatment with CicloMulsion(®). CONCLUSION: We have assessed the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a new Cremophor(®) EL-free lipid emulsion of ciclosporin, CicloMulsion(®), compared to Sandimmune(®). The proportion of adverse events was significantly higher for the Cremophor(®) EL-based product Sandimmune(®). We conclude that CicloMulsion(®) is bioequivalent to Sandimmune(®) and exhibits fewer adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3586182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer International Publishing AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35861822013-03-07 Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL Ehinger, Karl Henrik Johannes Hansson, Magnus Joakim Sjövall, Fredrik Elmér, Eskil Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Ciclosporin is used as an immunosuppressant in current clinical practice but recent research implies novel indications for the drug, such as neuro- and cardioprotection. The intravenous formulation currently on the market, Sandimmune(®) Injection (Sandimmune(®)), uses Cremophor(®) EL as emulsifying excipient. Cremophor(®) EL is known to cause hypersensitivity reactions in some patients, ranging from skin reactions to potentially fatal anaphylactic shock. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess if CicloMulsion(®), a Cremophor(®) EL-free lipid emulsion of ciclosporin for intravenous administration, is bioequivalent to Sandimmune(®), and the secondary objective was to compare the tolerability profiles of the two preparations. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, subject-blind, laboratory-blind, single-dose, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of two formulations of intravenous ciclosporin. Fifty-two healthy volunteer subjects were administered 5 mg/kg of each of the two formulations of ciclosporin as a 4-h intravenous infusion. The last blood sample was acquired 48 h after the end of the infusion. Bioequivalence assessments according to current guidelines were performed. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios for CicloMulsion(®)/Sandimmune(®) (90 % confidence interval [CI]) were 0.90 (0.88, 0.92) for AUC(0–last) (area under the blood concentration–time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration) and 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) for C(max) (maximum blood concentration). For all additional variables analysed, the 90 % CIs were also within the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. One anaphylactoid and one anaphylactic reaction, both classified as serious adverse events, were reported after treatment with Sandimmune(®). No serious adverse events were recorded after treatment with CicloMulsion(®). CONCLUSION: We have assessed the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a new Cremophor(®) EL-free lipid emulsion of ciclosporin, CicloMulsion(®), compared to Sandimmune(®). The proportion of adverse events was significantly higher for the Cremophor(®) EL-based product Sandimmune(®). We conclude that CicloMulsion(®) is bioequivalent to Sandimmune(®) and exhibits fewer adverse reactions. Springer International Publishing AG 2012-11-22 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3586182/ /pubmed/23179472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-012-0029-x Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ehinger, Karl Henrik Johannes
Hansson, Magnus Joakim
Sjövall, Fredrik
Elmér, Eskil
Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL
title Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL
title_full Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL
title_fullStr Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL
title_full_unstemmed Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL
title_short Bioequivalence and Tolerability Assessment of a Novel Intravenous Ciclosporin Lipid Emulsion Compared to Branded Ciclosporin in Cremophor(®) EL
title_sort bioequivalence and tolerability assessment of a novel intravenous ciclosporin lipid emulsion compared to branded ciclosporin in cremophor(®) el
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23179472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-012-0029-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ehingerkarlhenrikjohannes bioequivalenceandtolerabilityassessmentofanovelintravenousciclosporinlipidemulsioncomparedtobrandedciclosporinincremophorel
AT hanssonmagnusjoakim bioequivalenceandtolerabilityassessmentofanovelintravenousciclosporinlipidemulsioncomparedtobrandedciclosporinincremophorel
AT sjovallfredrik bioequivalenceandtolerabilityassessmentofanovelintravenousciclosporinlipidemulsioncomparedtobrandedciclosporinincremophorel
AT elmereskil bioequivalenceandtolerabilityassessmentofanovelintravenousciclosporinlipidemulsioncomparedtobrandedciclosporinincremophorel