Cargando…

Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches

Using models to simulate and analyze biological networks requires principled approaches to parameter estimation and model discrimination. We use Bayesian and Monte Carlo methods to recover the full probability distributions of free parameters (initial protein concentrations and rate constants) for m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eydgahi, Hoda, Chen, William W, Muhlich, Jeremy L, Vitkup, Dennis, Tsitsiklis, John N, Sorger, Peter K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Molecular Biology Organization 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.69
_version_ 1782261656405934080
author Eydgahi, Hoda
Chen, William W
Muhlich, Jeremy L
Vitkup, Dennis
Tsitsiklis, John N
Sorger, Peter K
author_facet Eydgahi, Hoda
Chen, William W
Muhlich, Jeremy L
Vitkup, Dennis
Tsitsiklis, John N
Sorger, Peter K
author_sort Eydgahi, Hoda
collection PubMed
description Using models to simulate and analyze biological networks requires principled approaches to parameter estimation and model discrimination. We use Bayesian and Monte Carlo methods to recover the full probability distributions of free parameters (initial protein concentrations and rate constants) for mass-action models of receptor-mediated cell death. The width of the individual parameter distributions is largely determined by non-identifiability but covariation among parameters, even those that are poorly determined, encodes essential information. Knowledge of joint parameter distributions makes it possible to compute the uncertainty of model-based predictions whereas ignoring it (e.g., by treating parameters as a simple list of values and variances) yields nonsensical predictions. Computing the Bayes factor from joint distributions yields the odds ratio (∼20-fold) for competing ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ apoptosis models having different numbers of parameters. Our results illustrate how Bayesian approaches to model calibration and discrimination combined with single-cell data represent a generally useful and rigorous approach to discriminate between competing hypotheses in the face of parametric and topological uncertainty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3588908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher European Molecular Biology Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35889082013-03-06 Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches Eydgahi, Hoda Chen, William W Muhlich, Jeremy L Vitkup, Dennis Tsitsiklis, John N Sorger, Peter K Mol Syst Biol Article Using models to simulate and analyze biological networks requires principled approaches to parameter estimation and model discrimination. We use Bayesian and Monte Carlo methods to recover the full probability distributions of free parameters (initial protein concentrations and rate constants) for mass-action models of receptor-mediated cell death. The width of the individual parameter distributions is largely determined by non-identifiability but covariation among parameters, even those that are poorly determined, encodes essential information. Knowledge of joint parameter distributions makes it possible to compute the uncertainty of model-based predictions whereas ignoring it (e.g., by treating parameters as a simple list of values and variances) yields nonsensical predictions. Computing the Bayes factor from joint distributions yields the odds ratio (∼20-fold) for competing ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ apoptosis models having different numbers of parameters. Our results illustrate how Bayesian approaches to model calibration and discrimination combined with single-cell data represent a generally useful and rigorous approach to discriminate between competing hypotheses in the face of parametric and topological uncertainty. European Molecular Biology Organization 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3588908/ /pubmed/23385484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.69 Text en Copyright © 2013, EMBO and Macmillan Publishers Limited https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
spellingShingle Article
Eydgahi, Hoda
Chen, William W
Muhlich, Jeremy L
Vitkup, Dennis
Tsitsiklis, John N
Sorger, Peter K
Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches
title Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches
title_full Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches
title_fullStr Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches
title_full_unstemmed Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches
title_short Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches
title_sort properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using bayesian approaches
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.69
work_keys_str_mv AT eydgahihoda propertiesofcelldeathmodelscalibratedandcomparedusingbayesianapproaches
AT chenwilliamw propertiesofcelldeathmodelscalibratedandcomparedusingbayesianapproaches
AT muhlichjeremyl propertiesofcelldeathmodelscalibratedandcomparedusingbayesianapproaches
AT vitkupdennis propertiesofcelldeathmodelscalibratedandcomparedusingbayesianapproaches
AT tsitsiklisjohnn propertiesofcelldeathmodelscalibratedandcomparedusingbayesianapproaches
AT sorgerpeterk propertiesofcelldeathmodelscalibratedandcomparedusingbayesianapproaches