Cargando…

MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context

To address how eukaryotic replication forks respond to fork stalling caused by strong non-covalent protein–DNA barriers, we engineered the controllable Fob-block system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This system allows us to strongly induce and control replication fork barriers (RFB) at their natural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bentsen, Iben B., Nielsen, Ida, Lisby, Michael, Nielsen, Helena B., Gupta, Souvik Sen, Mundbjerg, Kamilla, Andersen, Anni H., Bjergbaek, Lotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23376930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt051
_version_ 1782262680169480192
author Bentsen, Iben B.
Nielsen, Ida
Lisby, Michael
Nielsen, Helena B.
Gupta, Souvik Sen
Mundbjerg, Kamilla
Andersen, Anni H.
Bjergbaek, Lotte
author_facet Bentsen, Iben B.
Nielsen, Ida
Lisby, Michael
Nielsen, Helena B.
Gupta, Souvik Sen
Mundbjerg, Kamilla
Andersen, Anni H.
Bjergbaek, Lotte
author_sort Bentsen, Iben B.
collection PubMed
description To address how eukaryotic replication forks respond to fork stalling caused by strong non-covalent protein–DNA barriers, we engineered the controllable Fob-block system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This system allows us to strongly induce and control replication fork barriers (RFB) at their natural location within the rDNA. We discover a pivotal role for the MRX (Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2) complex for fork integrity at RFBs, which differs from its acknowledged function in double-strand break processing. Consequently, in the absence of the MRX complex, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) accumulates at the rDNA. Based on this, we propose a model where the MRX complex specifically protects stalled forks at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence leads to processing resulting in ssDNA. To our surprise, this ssDNA does not trigger a checkpoint response. Intriguingly, however, placing RFBs ectopically on chromosome VI provokes a strong Rad53 checkpoint activation in the absence of Mre11. We demonstrate that proper checkpoint signalling within the rDNA is restored on deletion of SIR2. This suggests the surprising and novel concept that chromatin is an important player in checkpoint signalling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3597703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35977032013-03-15 MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context Bentsen, Iben B. Nielsen, Ida Lisby, Michael Nielsen, Helena B. Gupta, Souvik Sen Mundbjerg, Kamilla Andersen, Anni H. Bjergbaek, Lotte Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication To address how eukaryotic replication forks respond to fork stalling caused by strong non-covalent protein–DNA barriers, we engineered the controllable Fob-block system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This system allows us to strongly induce and control replication fork barriers (RFB) at their natural location within the rDNA. We discover a pivotal role for the MRX (Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2) complex for fork integrity at RFBs, which differs from its acknowledged function in double-strand break processing. Consequently, in the absence of the MRX complex, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) accumulates at the rDNA. Based on this, we propose a model where the MRX complex specifically protects stalled forks at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence leads to processing resulting in ssDNA. To our surprise, this ssDNA does not trigger a checkpoint response. Intriguingly, however, placing RFBs ectopically on chromosome VI provokes a strong Rad53 checkpoint activation in the absence of Mre11. We demonstrate that proper checkpoint signalling within the rDNA is restored on deletion of SIR2. This suggests the surprising and novel concept that chromatin is an important player in checkpoint signalling. Oxford University Press 2013-03 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3597703/ /pubmed/23376930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt051 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
Bentsen, Iben B.
Nielsen, Ida
Lisby, Michael
Nielsen, Helena B.
Gupta, Souvik Sen
Mundbjerg, Kamilla
Andersen, Anni H.
Bjergbaek, Lotte
MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
title MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
title_full MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
title_fullStr MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
title_full_unstemmed MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
title_short MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
title_sort mrx protects fork integrity at protein–dna barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
topic Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23376930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt051
work_keys_str_mv AT bentsenibenb mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT nielsenida mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT lisbymichael mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT nielsenhelenab mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT guptasouviksen mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT mundbjergkamilla mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT andersenannih mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext
AT bjergbaeklotte mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext