Cargando…
MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context
To address how eukaryotic replication forks respond to fork stalling caused by strong non-covalent protein–DNA barriers, we engineered the controllable Fob-block system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This system allows us to strongly induce and control replication fork barriers (RFB) at their natural...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23376930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt051 |
_version_ | 1782262680169480192 |
---|---|
author | Bentsen, Iben B. Nielsen, Ida Lisby, Michael Nielsen, Helena B. Gupta, Souvik Sen Mundbjerg, Kamilla Andersen, Anni H. Bjergbaek, Lotte |
author_facet | Bentsen, Iben B. Nielsen, Ida Lisby, Michael Nielsen, Helena B. Gupta, Souvik Sen Mundbjerg, Kamilla Andersen, Anni H. Bjergbaek, Lotte |
author_sort | Bentsen, Iben B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To address how eukaryotic replication forks respond to fork stalling caused by strong non-covalent protein–DNA barriers, we engineered the controllable Fob-block system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This system allows us to strongly induce and control replication fork barriers (RFB) at their natural location within the rDNA. We discover a pivotal role for the MRX (Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2) complex for fork integrity at RFBs, which differs from its acknowledged function in double-strand break processing. Consequently, in the absence of the MRX complex, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) accumulates at the rDNA. Based on this, we propose a model where the MRX complex specifically protects stalled forks at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence leads to processing resulting in ssDNA. To our surprise, this ssDNA does not trigger a checkpoint response. Intriguingly, however, placing RFBs ectopically on chromosome VI provokes a strong Rad53 checkpoint activation in the absence of Mre11. We demonstrate that proper checkpoint signalling within the rDNA is restored on deletion of SIR2. This suggests the surprising and novel concept that chromatin is an important player in checkpoint signalling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3597703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35977032013-03-15 MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context Bentsen, Iben B. Nielsen, Ida Lisby, Michael Nielsen, Helena B. Gupta, Souvik Sen Mundbjerg, Kamilla Andersen, Anni H. Bjergbaek, Lotte Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication To address how eukaryotic replication forks respond to fork stalling caused by strong non-covalent protein–DNA barriers, we engineered the controllable Fob-block system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This system allows us to strongly induce and control replication fork barriers (RFB) at their natural location within the rDNA. We discover a pivotal role for the MRX (Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2) complex for fork integrity at RFBs, which differs from its acknowledged function in double-strand break processing. Consequently, in the absence of the MRX complex, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) accumulates at the rDNA. Based on this, we propose a model where the MRX complex specifically protects stalled forks at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence leads to processing resulting in ssDNA. To our surprise, this ssDNA does not trigger a checkpoint response. Intriguingly, however, placing RFBs ectopically on chromosome VI provokes a strong Rad53 checkpoint activation in the absence of Mre11. We demonstrate that proper checkpoint signalling within the rDNA is restored on deletion of SIR2. This suggests the surprising and novel concept that chromatin is an important player in checkpoint signalling. Oxford University Press 2013-03 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3597703/ /pubmed/23376930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt051 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Bentsen, Iben B. Nielsen, Ida Lisby, Michael Nielsen, Helena B. Gupta, Souvik Sen Mundbjerg, Kamilla Andersen, Anni H. Bjergbaek, Lotte MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
title | MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
title_full | MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
title_fullStr | MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
title_full_unstemmed | MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
title_short | MRX protects fork integrity at protein–DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
title_sort | mrx protects fork integrity at protein–dna barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context |
topic | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23376930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bentsenibenb mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT nielsenida mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT lisbymichael mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT nielsenhelenab mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT guptasouviksen mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT mundbjergkamilla mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT andersenannih mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext AT bjergbaeklotte mrxprotectsforkintegrityatproteindnabarriersanditsabsencecausescheckpointactivationdependentonchromatincontext |