Cargando…
A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice
BACKGROUND: Medetomidine-ketamine (MK) and dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) are widely used to provide general anaesthesia in laboratory animals, but have not been compared directly in many of these species, including rodents. This study aimed to compare the onset and depth of anaesthesia, and changes...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-48 |
_version_ | 1782263858127175680 |
---|---|
author | Burnside, Wesley M Flecknell, Paul A Cameron, Angus I Thomas, Aurélie A |
author_facet | Burnside, Wesley M Flecknell, Paul A Cameron, Angus I Thomas, Aurélie A |
author_sort | Burnside, Wesley M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medetomidine-ketamine (MK) and dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) are widely used to provide general anaesthesia in laboratory animals, but have not been compared directly in many of these species, including rodents. This study aimed to compare the onset and depth of anaesthesia, and changes in vital signs, after intraperitoneal (IP) or subcutaneous (SC) administration of ketamine (75 mg kg(-1)) combined with medetomidine (1 mg kg(-1)) or dexmedetomidine (0.5 mg kg(-1)) using a randomised semi-crossover design with ≥ 48 hours between treatments in 10 male and 10 female mice. Each mouse was anaesthetised twice using the same administration route (IP or SC): once with each drug-ketamine combination. Anaesthetised mice were monitored on a heating pad without supplemental oxygen for 89 minutes; atipamezole was administered for reversal. The times that the righting reflex was lost post-injection and returned post-reversal were analysed using general linear models. Tail-pinch and pedal reflexes were examined using binomial generalized linear models. Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (fr), and arterial haemoglobin saturation (S(p)O(2)) were compared using generalized additive mixed models. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among treatments for the times taken for loss and return of the righting reflex, or response of the tail-pinch reflex. The pedal withdrawal reflex was abolished more frequently with MK than DK over time (P = 0.021). The response of PR and S(p)O(2) were similar among treatments, but fr was significantly higher with MK than DK (P ≤ 0.0005). Markedly low S(p)O(2) concentrations occurred within 5 minutes post-injection (83.8 ± 6.7%) in all treatment groups and were most severe after 89 minutes lapsed (66.7 ± 7.5%). No statistical differences were detected in regards to administration route (P ≤ 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate clinical advantages of the enantiomer dexmedetomidine over medetomidine when combined with ketamine to produce general anaesthesia in mice. At the doses administered, deep surgical anaesthesia was not consistently produced with either combination; therefore, anaesthetic depth must be assessed before performing surgical procedures. Supplemental oxygen should always be provided during anaesthesia to prevent hypoxaemia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3605306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36053062013-03-23 A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice Burnside, Wesley M Flecknell, Paul A Cameron, Angus I Thomas, Aurélie A BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Medetomidine-ketamine (MK) and dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) are widely used to provide general anaesthesia in laboratory animals, but have not been compared directly in many of these species, including rodents. This study aimed to compare the onset and depth of anaesthesia, and changes in vital signs, after intraperitoneal (IP) or subcutaneous (SC) administration of ketamine (75 mg kg(-1)) combined with medetomidine (1 mg kg(-1)) or dexmedetomidine (0.5 mg kg(-1)) using a randomised semi-crossover design with ≥ 48 hours between treatments in 10 male and 10 female mice. Each mouse was anaesthetised twice using the same administration route (IP or SC): once with each drug-ketamine combination. Anaesthetised mice were monitored on a heating pad without supplemental oxygen for 89 minutes; atipamezole was administered for reversal. The times that the righting reflex was lost post-injection and returned post-reversal were analysed using general linear models. Tail-pinch and pedal reflexes were examined using binomial generalized linear models. Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (fr), and arterial haemoglobin saturation (S(p)O(2)) were compared using generalized additive mixed models. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among treatments for the times taken for loss and return of the righting reflex, or response of the tail-pinch reflex. The pedal withdrawal reflex was abolished more frequently with MK than DK over time (P = 0.021). The response of PR and S(p)O(2) were similar among treatments, but fr was significantly higher with MK than DK (P ≤ 0.0005). Markedly low S(p)O(2) concentrations occurred within 5 minutes post-injection (83.8 ± 6.7%) in all treatment groups and were most severe after 89 minutes lapsed (66.7 ± 7.5%). No statistical differences were detected in regards to administration route (P ≤ 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate clinical advantages of the enantiomer dexmedetomidine over medetomidine when combined with ketamine to produce general anaesthesia in mice. At the doses administered, deep surgical anaesthesia was not consistently produced with either combination; therefore, anaesthetic depth must be assessed before performing surgical procedures. Supplemental oxygen should always be provided during anaesthesia to prevent hypoxaemia. BioMed Central 2013-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3605306/ /pubmed/23497612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-48 Text en Copyright ©2013 Burnside et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Burnside, Wesley M Flecknell, Paul A Cameron, Angus I Thomas, Aurélie A A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
title | A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
title_full | A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
title_fullStr | A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
title_short | A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
title_sort | comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-48 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burnsidewesleym acomparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT flecknellpaula acomparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT cameronangusi acomparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT thomasaureliea acomparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT burnsidewesleym comparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT flecknellpaula comparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT cameronangusi comparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice AT thomasaureliea comparisonofmedetomidineanditsactiveenantiomerdexmedetomidinewhenadministeredwithketamineinmice |