Cargando…

DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review

In DNA methylation, methyl groups are covalently bound to CpG dinucleotides. However, the assumption that methyl groups are not lost during routine DNA extraction has not been empirically tested. To avoid nonbiological associations in DNA methylation studies, it is essential to account for potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina, Jiménez-Conde, Jordi, Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva, Ois, Ángel, Rodríguez-Campello, Ana, Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa, Fernández-Cadenas, Israel, Montaner, Joan, Lucas, Gavin, Elosua, Roberto, Roquer, Jaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060750
_version_ 1782265789965926400
author Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina
Jiménez-Conde, Jordi
Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva
Ois, Ángel
Rodríguez-Campello, Ana
Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa
Fernández-Cadenas, Israel
Montaner, Joan
Lucas, Gavin
Elosua, Roberto
Roquer, Jaume
author_facet Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina
Jiménez-Conde, Jordi
Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva
Ois, Ángel
Rodríguez-Campello, Ana
Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa
Fernández-Cadenas, Israel
Montaner, Joan
Lucas, Gavin
Elosua, Roberto
Roquer, Jaume
author_sort Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina
collection PubMed
description In DNA methylation, methyl groups are covalently bound to CpG dinucleotides. However, the assumption that methyl groups are not lost during routine DNA extraction has not been empirically tested. To avoid nonbiological associations in DNA methylation studies, it is essential to account for potential batch effect bias in the assessment of this epigenetic mechanism. Our purpose was to determine if the DNA isolation method is an independent source of variability in methylation status. We quantified Global DNA Methylation (GDM) by luminometric methylation assay (LUMA), comparing the results from 3 different DNA isolation methods. In the controlled analysis (n = 9), GDM differed slightly for the same individual depending on extraction method. In the population analysis (n = 580) there were significant differences in GDM between the 3 DNA isolation methods (medians, 78.1%, 76.5% and 75.1%; p<0.001). A systematic review of published data from LUMA GDM studies that specify DNA extraction methods is concordant with our findings. DNA isolation method is a source of GDM variability measured with LUMA. To avoid possible bias, the method used should be reported and taken into account in future DNA methylation studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3621987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36219872013-04-12 DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina Jiménez-Conde, Jordi Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva Ois, Ángel Rodríguez-Campello, Ana Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa Fernández-Cadenas, Israel Montaner, Joan Lucas, Gavin Elosua, Roberto Roquer, Jaume PLoS One Research Article In DNA methylation, methyl groups are covalently bound to CpG dinucleotides. However, the assumption that methyl groups are not lost during routine DNA extraction has not been empirically tested. To avoid nonbiological associations in DNA methylation studies, it is essential to account for potential batch effect bias in the assessment of this epigenetic mechanism. Our purpose was to determine if the DNA isolation method is an independent source of variability in methylation status. We quantified Global DNA Methylation (GDM) by luminometric methylation assay (LUMA), comparing the results from 3 different DNA isolation methods. In the controlled analysis (n = 9), GDM differed slightly for the same individual depending on extraction method. In the population analysis (n = 580) there were significant differences in GDM between the 3 DNA isolation methods (medians, 78.1%, 76.5% and 75.1%; p<0.001). A systematic review of published data from LUMA GDM studies that specify DNA extraction methods is concordant with our findings. DNA isolation method is a source of GDM variability measured with LUMA. To avoid possible bias, the method used should be reported and taken into account in future DNA methylation studies. Public Library of Science 2013-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3621987/ /pubmed/23585847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060750 Text en © 2013 Soriano-Tárraga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina
Jiménez-Conde, Jordi
Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva
Ois, Ángel
Rodríguez-Campello, Ana
Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa
Fernández-Cadenas, Israel
Montaner, Joan
Lucas, Gavin
Elosua, Roberto
Roquer, Jaume
DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
title DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
title_full DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
title_fullStr DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
title_short DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
title_sort dna isolation method is a source of global dna methylation variability measured with luma. experimental analysis and a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060750
work_keys_str_mv AT sorianotarragacarolina dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT jimenezcondejordi dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT giraltsteinhauereva dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT oisangel dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT rodriguezcampelloana dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT cuadradogodiaelisa dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT fernandezcadenasisrael dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT montanerjoan dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT lucasgavin dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT elosuaroberto dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT roquerjaume dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview
AT dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview