Cargando…
DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review
In DNA methylation, methyl groups are covalently bound to CpG dinucleotides. However, the assumption that methyl groups are not lost during routine DNA extraction has not been empirically tested. To avoid nonbiological associations in DNA methylation studies, it is essential to account for potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060750 |
_version_ | 1782265789965926400 |
---|---|
author | Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina Jiménez-Conde, Jordi Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva Ois, Ángel Rodríguez-Campello, Ana Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa Fernández-Cadenas, Israel Montaner, Joan Lucas, Gavin Elosua, Roberto Roquer, Jaume |
author_facet | Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina Jiménez-Conde, Jordi Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva Ois, Ángel Rodríguez-Campello, Ana Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa Fernández-Cadenas, Israel Montaner, Joan Lucas, Gavin Elosua, Roberto Roquer, Jaume |
author_sort | Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | In DNA methylation, methyl groups are covalently bound to CpG dinucleotides. However, the assumption that methyl groups are not lost during routine DNA extraction has not been empirically tested. To avoid nonbiological associations in DNA methylation studies, it is essential to account for potential batch effect bias in the assessment of this epigenetic mechanism. Our purpose was to determine if the DNA isolation method is an independent source of variability in methylation status. We quantified Global DNA Methylation (GDM) by luminometric methylation assay (LUMA), comparing the results from 3 different DNA isolation methods. In the controlled analysis (n = 9), GDM differed slightly for the same individual depending on extraction method. In the population analysis (n = 580) there were significant differences in GDM between the 3 DNA isolation methods (medians, 78.1%, 76.5% and 75.1%; p<0.001). A systematic review of published data from LUMA GDM studies that specify DNA extraction methods is concordant with our findings. DNA isolation method is a source of GDM variability measured with LUMA. To avoid possible bias, the method used should be reported and taken into account in future DNA methylation studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3621987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36219872013-04-12 DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina Jiménez-Conde, Jordi Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva Ois, Ángel Rodríguez-Campello, Ana Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa Fernández-Cadenas, Israel Montaner, Joan Lucas, Gavin Elosua, Roberto Roquer, Jaume PLoS One Research Article In DNA methylation, methyl groups are covalently bound to CpG dinucleotides. However, the assumption that methyl groups are not lost during routine DNA extraction has not been empirically tested. To avoid nonbiological associations in DNA methylation studies, it is essential to account for potential batch effect bias in the assessment of this epigenetic mechanism. Our purpose was to determine if the DNA isolation method is an independent source of variability in methylation status. We quantified Global DNA Methylation (GDM) by luminometric methylation assay (LUMA), comparing the results from 3 different DNA isolation methods. In the controlled analysis (n = 9), GDM differed slightly for the same individual depending on extraction method. In the population analysis (n = 580) there were significant differences in GDM between the 3 DNA isolation methods (medians, 78.1%, 76.5% and 75.1%; p<0.001). A systematic review of published data from LUMA GDM studies that specify DNA extraction methods is concordant with our findings. DNA isolation method is a source of GDM variability measured with LUMA. To avoid possible bias, the method used should be reported and taken into account in future DNA methylation studies. Public Library of Science 2013-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3621987/ /pubmed/23585847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060750 Text en © 2013 Soriano-Tárraga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Soriano-Tárraga, Carolina Jiménez-Conde, Jordi Giralt-Steinhauer, Eva Ois, Ángel Rodríguez-Campello, Ana Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa Fernández-Cadenas, Israel Montaner, Joan Lucas, Gavin Elosua, Roberto Roquer, Jaume DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review |
title | DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review |
title_full | DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review |
title_short | DNA Isolation Method Is a Source of Global DNA Methylation Variability Measured with LUMA. Experimental Analysis and a Systematic Review |
title_sort | dna isolation method is a source of global dna methylation variability measured with luma. experimental analysis and a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorianotarragacarolina dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT jimenezcondejordi dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT giraltsteinhauereva dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT oisangel dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT rodriguezcampelloana dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT cuadradogodiaelisa dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT fernandezcadenasisrael dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT montanerjoan dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT lucasgavin dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT elosuaroberto dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT roquerjaume dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview AT dnaisolationmethodisasourceofglobaldnamethylationvariabilitymeasuredwithlumaexperimentalanalysisandasystematicreview |