Cargando…
A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness
This mixed methods study was a comprehensive impact-process evaluation of the Ride2School program in metropolitan and regional areas in Victoria, Australia. The program aimed to promote transport to school for primary school children. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected at baseline and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816961 |
_version_ | 1782266392657002496 |
---|---|
author | Crawford, S. Garrard, J. |
author_facet | Crawford, S. Garrard, J. |
author_sort | Crawford, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This mixed methods study was a comprehensive impact-process evaluation of the Ride2School program in metropolitan and regional areas in Victoria, Australia. The program aimed to promote transport to school for primary school children. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected at baseline and followup from two primary schools involved in the pilot phase of the program and two matched comparison schools, and a further 13 primary schools that participated in the implementation phase of the program. Classroom surveys, structured and unstructured observations, and interviews with Ride2School program staff were used to evaluate the pilot program. For the 13 schools in the second phase of the program, parents and students completed questionnaires at baseline (N = 889) and followup (N = 761). Based on the quantitative data, there was little evidence of an overall increase in active transport to school across participating schools, although impacts varied among individual schools. Qualitative data in the form of observations, interviews, and focus group discussions with students, school staff, and program staff provided insight into the reasons for variable program impacts. This paper highlights the benefits of undertaking a mixed methods approach to evaluating active transport to school programs that enables both measurement and understanding of program impacts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3628214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36282142013-04-19 A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness Crawford, S. Garrard, J. J Environ Public Health Research Article This mixed methods study was a comprehensive impact-process evaluation of the Ride2School program in metropolitan and regional areas in Victoria, Australia. The program aimed to promote transport to school for primary school children. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected at baseline and followup from two primary schools involved in the pilot phase of the program and two matched comparison schools, and a further 13 primary schools that participated in the implementation phase of the program. Classroom surveys, structured and unstructured observations, and interviews with Ride2School program staff were used to evaluate the pilot program. For the 13 schools in the second phase of the program, parents and students completed questionnaires at baseline (N = 889) and followup (N = 761). Based on the quantitative data, there was little evidence of an overall increase in active transport to school across participating schools, although impacts varied among individual schools. Qualitative data in the form of observations, interviews, and focus group discussions with students, school staff, and program staff provided insight into the reasons for variable program impacts. This paper highlights the benefits of undertaking a mixed methods approach to evaluating active transport to school programs that enables both measurement and understanding of program impacts. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3628214/ /pubmed/23606865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816961 Text en Copyright © 2013 S. Crawford and J. Garrard. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crawford, S. Garrard, J. A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness |
title | A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness |
title_full | A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness |
title_fullStr | A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness |
title_short | A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness |
title_sort | combined impact-process evaluation of a program promoting active transport to school: understanding the factors that shaped program effectiveness |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crawfords acombinedimpactprocessevaluationofaprogrampromotingactivetransporttoschoolunderstandingthefactorsthatshapedprogrameffectiveness AT garrardj acombinedimpactprocessevaluationofaprogrampromotingactivetransporttoschoolunderstandingthefactorsthatshapedprogrameffectiveness AT crawfords combinedimpactprocessevaluationofaprogrampromotingactivetransporttoschoolunderstandingthefactorsthatshapedprogrameffectiveness AT garrardj combinedimpactprocessevaluationofaprogrampromotingactivetransporttoschoolunderstandingthefactorsthatshapedprogrameffectiveness |