Cargando…

Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, we believe that cancer is a genetic disease. We focus on the genetic targets and epigenetic changes in a tumor. Remarkably, many crucial signal pathways in a malignant cell involve “stem-ness” genes. The prevalence of stem-ness in cancer suggests that cancer has a stem-cell ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tu, Shi-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23647946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-13-40
_version_ 1782269223844708352
author Tu, Shi-Ming
author_facet Tu, Shi-Ming
author_sort Tu, Shi-Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nowadays, we believe that cancer is a genetic disease. We focus on the genetic targets and epigenetic changes in a tumor. Remarkably, many crucial signal pathways in a malignant cell involve “stem-ness” genes. The prevalence of stem-ness in cancer suggests that cancer has a stem-cell origin and is a stem-cell disease. PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The observation that many innate stem-ness properties are easily interchangeable with malignant hallmarks needs to be further elucidated. There appears to be a malignant potential in every stem cell and a stem cell potential in every malignant cell. I hypothesize that cancer is a stem-cell disease rather than a genetic disease. TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS: We will use homeobox genes to endow a certain progenitor cell with specific stem-ness properties and confer different stem-cell phenotypes to the particular cell type in a hierarchical manner. We will demonstrate that an earlier homeobox gene plus a genetic defect (such as Pten loss) tend to form a more virulent tumor, while a later homeobox gene plus the same genetic defect tend to express a more indolent phenotype. Importantly, we will show that in clinically relevant cancer subtypes, those with worse clinical outcomes may paradoxically harbor fewer genetic mutations than those with better outcomes do. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The recognition that cancer is a stem-cell disease will instigate major paradigm shifts in our basic understanding of cancer. Many fundamental principles of oncology, such as multistep carcinogenesis, need to be reconciled. The realization that cancer is a stem-cell disease will also have profound clinical implications on personalized care. Many aspects of our current clinical trials need to be reevaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3651409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36514092013-05-11 Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease? Tu, Shi-Ming Cancer Cell Int Hypothesis BACKGROUND: Nowadays, we believe that cancer is a genetic disease. We focus on the genetic targets and epigenetic changes in a tumor. Remarkably, many crucial signal pathways in a malignant cell involve “stem-ness” genes. The prevalence of stem-ness in cancer suggests that cancer has a stem-cell origin and is a stem-cell disease. PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The observation that many innate stem-ness properties are easily interchangeable with malignant hallmarks needs to be further elucidated. There appears to be a malignant potential in every stem cell and a stem cell potential in every malignant cell. I hypothesize that cancer is a stem-cell disease rather than a genetic disease. TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS: We will use homeobox genes to endow a certain progenitor cell with specific stem-ness properties and confer different stem-cell phenotypes to the particular cell type in a hierarchical manner. We will demonstrate that an earlier homeobox gene plus a genetic defect (such as Pten loss) tend to form a more virulent tumor, while a later homeobox gene plus the same genetic defect tend to express a more indolent phenotype. Importantly, we will show that in clinically relevant cancer subtypes, those with worse clinical outcomes may paradoxically harbor fewer genetic mutations than those with better outcomes do. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The recognition that cancer is a stem-cell disease will instigate major paradigm shifts in our basic understanding of cancer. Many fundamental principles of oncology, such as multistep carcinogenesis, need to be reconciled. The realization that cancer is a stem-cell disease will also have profound clinical implications on personalized care. Many aspects of our current clinical trials need to be reevaluated. BioMed Central 2013-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3651409/ /pubmed/23647946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-13-40 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tu; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Tu, Shi-Ming
Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
title Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
title_full Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
title_fullStr Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
title_full_unstemmed Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
title_short Cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
title_sort cancer: a “stem-cell” disease?
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23647946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-13-40
work_keys_str_mv AT tushiming cancerastemcelldisease