Cargando…

Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school

INTRODUCTION: International interest in peer-teaching and peer-assisted learning (PAL) during undergraduate medical programs has grown in recent years, reflected both in literature and in practice. There, remains however, a distinct lack of objective clarity and consensus on the true effectiveness o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Tzu-Chieh, Wilson, Nichola C, Singh, Primal P, Lemanu, Daniel P, Hawken, Susan J, Hill, Andrew G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745087
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14383
_version_ 1782270650551894016
author Yu, Tzu-Chieh
Wilson, Nichola C
Singh, Primal P
Lemanu, Daniel P
Hawken, Susan J
Hill, Andrew G
author_facet Yu, Tzu-Chieh
Wilson, Nichola C
Singh, Primal P
Lemanu, Daniel P
Hawken, Susan J
Hill, Andrew G
author_sort Yu, Tzu-Chieh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: International interest in peer-teaching and peer-assisted learning (PAL) during undergraduate medical programs has grown in recent years, reflected both in literature and in practice. There, remains however, a distinct lack of objective clarity and consensus on the true effectiveness of peer-teaching and its short- and long-term impacts on learning outcomes and clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and critically appraise evidence presented on peer-teaching effectiveness and its impact on objective learning outcomes of medical students. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Titles and abstracts were screened and selection was based on strict eligibility criteria after examining full-texts. Two reviewers used a standard review and analysis framework to independently extract data from each study. Discrepancies in opinions were resolved by discussion in consultation with other reviewers. Adapted models of “Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Learning” were used to grade the impact size of study outcomes. RESULTS: From 127 potential titles, 41 were obtained as full-texts, and 19 selected after close examination and group deliberation. Fifteen studies focused on student-learner outcomes and four on student-teacher learning outcomes. Ten studies utilized randomized allocation and the majority of study participants were self-selected volunteers. Written examinations and observed clinical evaluations were common study outcome assessments. Eleven studies provided student-teachers with formal teacher training. Overall, results suggest that peer-teaching, in highly selective contexts, achieves short-term learner outcomes that are comparable with those produced by faculty-based teaching. Furthermore, peer-teaching has beneficial effects on student-teacher learning outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-teaching in undergraduate medical programs is comparable to conventional teaching when utilized in selected contexts. There is evidence to suggest that participating student-teachers benefit academically and professionally. Long-term effects of peer-teaching during medical school remain poorly understood and future research should aim to address this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36612562013-06-06 Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school Yu, Tzu-Chieh Wilson, Nichola C Singh, Primal P Lemanu, Daniel P Hawken, Susan J Hill, Andrew G Adv Med Educ Pract Review INTRODUCTION: International interest in peer-teaching and peer-assisted learning (PAL) during undergraduate medical programs has grown in recent years, reflected both in literature and in practice. There, remains however, a distinct lack of objective clarity and consensus on the true effectiveness of peer-teaching and its short- and long-term impacts on learning outcomes and clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and critically appraise evidence presented on peer-teaching effectiveness and its impact on objective learning outcomes of medical students. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Titles and abstracts were screened and selection was based on strict eligibility criteria after examining full-texts. Two reviewers used a standard review and analysis framework to independently extract data from each study. Discrepancies in opinions were resolved by discussion in consultation with other reviewers. Adapted models of “Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Learning” were used to grade the impact size of study outcomes. RESULTS: From 127 potential titles, 41 were obtained as full-texts, and 19 selected after close examination and group deliberation. Fifteen studies focused on student-learner outcomes and four on student-teacher learning outcomes. Ten studies utilized randomized allocation and the majority of study participants were self-selected volunteers. Written examinations and observed clinical evaluations were common study outcome assessments. Eleven studies provided student-teachers with formal teacher training. Overall, results suggest that peer-teaching, in highly selective contexts, achieves short-term learner outcomes that are comparable with those produced by faculty-based teaching. Furthermore, peer-teaching has beneficial effects on student-teacher learning outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-teaching in undergraduate medical programs is comparable to conventional teaching when utilized in selected contexts. There is evidence to suggest that participating student-teachers benefit academically and professionally. Long-term effects of peer-teaching during medical school remain poorly understood and future research should aim to address this. Dove Medical Press 2011-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3661256/ /pubmed/23745087 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14383 Text en © 2011 Yu et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Yu, Tzu-Chieh
Wilson, Nichola C
Singh, Primal P
Lemanu, Daniel P
Hawken, Susan J
Hill, Andrew G
Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
title Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
title_full Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
title_fullStr Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
title_full_unstemmed Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
title_short Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
title_sort medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745087
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14383
work_keys_str_mv AT yutzuchieh medicalstudentsasteachersasystematicreviewofpeerassistedteachingduringmedicalschool
AT wilsonnicholac medicalstudentsasteachersasystematicreviewofpeerassistedteachingduringmedicalschool
AT singhprimalp medicalstudentsasteachersasystematicreviewofpeerassistedteachingduringmedicalschool
AT lemanudanielp medicalstudentsasteachersasystematicreviewofpeerassistedteachingduringmedicalschool
AT hawkensusanj medicalstudentsasteachersasystematicreviewofpeerassistedteachingduringmedicalschool
AT hillandrewg medicalstudentsasteachersasystematicreviewofpeerassistedteachingduringmedicalschool