Cargando…

Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise

Individual cells from a genetically identical population exhibit substantial variation in gene expression. A significant part of this variation is due to noise in the process of transcription that is intrinsic to each gene, and is determined by factors such as the rate with which the promoter transi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadiani, Maya, van Dijk, David, Segal, Barak, Field, Yair, Ben-Artzi, Gil, Raveh-Sadka, Tali, Levo, Michal, Kaplow, Irene, Weinberger, Adina, Segal, Eran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.149096.112
_version_ 1782271618984181760
author Dadiani, Maya
van Dijk, David
Segal, Barak
Field, Yair
Ben-Artzi, Gil
Raveh-Sadka, Tali
Levo, Michal
Kaplow, Irene
Weinberger, Adina
Segal, Eran
author_facet Dadiani, Maya
van Dijk, David
Segal, Barak
Field, Yair
Ben-Artzi, Gil
Raveh-Sadka, Tali
Levo, Michal
Kaplow, Irene
Weinberger, Adina
Segal, Eran
author_sort Dadiani, Maya
collection PubMed
description Individual cells from a genetically identical population exhibit substantial variation in gene expression. A significant part of this variation is due to noise in the process of transcription that is intrinsic to each gene, and is determined by factors such as the rate with which the promoter transitions between transcriptionally active and inactive states, and the number of transcripts produced during the active state. However, we have a limited understanding of how the DNA sequence affects such promoter dynamics. Here, we used single-cell time-lapse microscopy to compare the effect on transcriptional dynamics of two distinct types of sequence changes in the promoter that can each increase the mean expression of a cell population by similar amounts but through different mechanisms. We show that increasing expression by strengthening a transcription factor binding site results in slower promoter dynamics and higher noise as compared with increasing expression by adding nucleosome-disfavoring sequences. Our results suggest that when achieving the same mean expression, the strategy of using stronger binding sites results in a larger number of transcripts produced from the active state, whereas the strategy of adding nucleosome-disfavoring sequences results in a higher frequency of promoter transitions between active and inactive states. In the latter strategy, this increased sampling of the active state likely reduces the expression variability of the cell population. Our study thus demonstrates the effect of cis-regulatory elements on expression variability and points to concrete types of sequence changes that may allow partial decoupling of expression level and noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3668364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36683642013-12-01 Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise Dadiani, Maya van Dijk, David Segal, Barak Field, Yair Ben-Artzi, Gil Raveh-Sadka, Tali Levo, Michal Kaplow, Irene Weinberger, Adina Segal, Eran Genome Res Research Individual cells from a genetically identical population exhibit substantial variation in gene expression. A significant part of this variation is due to noise in the process of transcription that is intrinsic to each gene, and is determined by factors such as the rate with which the promoter transitions between transcriptionally active and inactive states, and the number of transcripts produced during the active state. However, we have a limited understanding of how the DNA sequence affects such promoter dynamics. Here, we used single-cell time-lapse microscopy to compare the effect on transcriptional dynamics of two distinct types of sequence changes in the promoter that can each increase the mean expression of a cell population by similar amounts but through different mechanisms. We show that increasing expression by strengthening a transcription factor binding site results in slower promoter dynamics and higher noise as compared with increasing expression by adding nucleosome-disfavoring sequences. Our results suggest that when achieving the same mean expression, the strategy of using stronger binding sites results in a larger number of transcripts produced from the active state, whereas the strategy of adding nucleosome-disfavoring sequences results in a higher frequency of promoter transitions between active and inactive states. In the latter strategy, this increased sampling of the active state likely reduces the expression variability of the cell population. Our study thus demonstrates the effect of cis-regulatory elements on expression variability and points to concrete types of sequence changes that may allow partial decoupling of expression level and noise. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3668364/ /pubmed/23403035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.149096.112 Text en © 2013, Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Dadiani, Maya
van Dijk, David
Segal, Barak
Field, Yair
Ben-Artzi, Gil
Raveh-Sadka, Tali
Levo, Michal
Kaplow, Irene
Weinberger, Adina
Segal, Eran
Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
title Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
title_full Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
title_fullStr Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
title_full_unstemmed Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
title_short Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
title_sort two dna-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.149096.112
work_keys_str_mv AT dadianimaya twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT vandijkdavid twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT segalbarak twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT fieldyair twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT benartzigil twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT ravehsadkatali twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT levomichal twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT kaplowirene twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT weinbergeradina twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise
AT segaleran twodnaencodedstrategiesforincreasingexpressionwithopposingeffectsonpromoterdynamicsandtranscriptionalnoise