Cargando…

Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study

OBJECTIVES: Virtual patients (VPs) are online representations of clinical cases used in medical education. Widely adopted, they are well placed to teach clinical reasoning skills. International technology standards mean VPs can be created, shared and repurposed between institutions. A systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bateman, James, Allen, Maggie, Samani, Dipti, Kidd, Jane, Davies, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3677415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12151
_version_ 1782272740190846976
author Bateman, James
Allen, Maggie
Samani, Dipti
Kidd, Jane
Davies, David
author_facet Bateman, James
Allen, Maggie
Samani, Dipti
Kidd, Jane
Davies, David
author_sort Bateman, James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Virtual patients (VPs) are online representations of clinical cases used in medical education. Widely adopted, they are well placed to teach clinical reasoning skills. International technology standards mean VPs can be created, shared and repurposed between institutions. A systematic review has highlighted the lack of evidence to support which of the numerous VP designs may be effective, and why. We set out to research the influence of VP design on medical undergraduates. METHODS: This is a grounded theory study into the influence of VP design on undergraduate medical students. Following a review of the literature and publicly available VP cases, we identified important design properties. We integrated them into two substantial VPs produced for this research. Using purposeful iterative sampling, 46 medical undergraduates were recruited to participate in six focus groups. Participants completed both VPs, an evaluation and a 1-hour focus group discussion. These were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory, supported by computer-assisted analysis. Following open, axial and selective coding, we produced a theoretical model describing how students learn from VPs. RESULTS: We identified a central core phenomenon designated ‘learning from the VP’. This had four categories: VP Construction; External Preconditions; Student–VP Interaction, and Consequences. From these, we constructed a three-layer model describing the interactions of students with VPs. The inner layer consists of the student's cognitive and behavioural preconditions prior to sitting a case. The middle layer considers the VP as an ‘encoded object’, an e-learning artefact and as a ‘constructed activity’, with associated pedagogic and organisational elements. The outer layer describes cognitive and behavioural change. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first grounded theory study to explore VP design. This original research has produced a model which enhances understanding of how and why the delivery and design of VPs influence learning. The model may be of practical use to authors, institutions and researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3677415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36774152013-06-10 Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study Bateman, James Allen, Maggie Samani, Dipti Kidd, Jane Davies, David Med Educ Virtual Patients OBJECTIVES: Virtual patients (VPs) are online representations of clinical cases used in medical education. Widely adopted, they are well placed to teach clinical reasoning skills. International technology standards mean VPs can be created, shared and repurposed between institutions. A systematic review has highlighted the lack of evidence to support which of the numerous VP designs may be effective, and why. We set out to research the influence of VP design on medical undergraduates. METHODS: This is a grounded theory study into the influence of VP design on undergraduate medical students. Following a review of the literature and publicly available VP cases, we identified important design properties. We integrated them into two substantial VPs produced for this research. Using purposeful iterative sampling, 46 medical undergraduates were recruited to participate in six focus groups. Participants completed both VPs, an evaluation and a 1-hour focus group discussion. These were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory, supported by computer-assisted analysis. Following open, axial and selective coding, we produced a theoretical model describing how students learn from VPs. RESULTS: We identified a central core phenomenon designated ‘learning from the VP’. This had four categories: VP Construction; External Preconditions; Student–VP Interaction, and Consequences. From these, we constructed a three-layer model describing the interactions of students with VPs. The inner layer consists of the student's cognitive and behavioural preconditions prior to sitting a case. The middle layer considers the VP as an ‘encoded object’, an e-learning artefact and as a ‘constructed activity’, with associated pedagogic and organisational elements. The outer layer describes cognitive and behavioural change. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first grounded theory study to explore VP design. This original research has produced a model which enhances understanding of how and why the delivery and design of VPs influence learning. The model may be of practical use to authors, institutions and researchers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-06 2013-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3677415/ /pubmed/23662877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12151 Text en Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Virtual Patients
Bateman, James
Allen, Maggie
Samani, Dipti
Kidd, Jane
Davies, David
Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
title Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
title_full Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
title_fullStr Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
title_full_unstemmed Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
title_short Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
title_sort virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. a grounded theory study
topic Virtual Patients
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3677415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12151
work_keys_str_mv AT batemanjames virtualpatientdesignexploringwhatworksandwhyagroundedtheorystudy
AT allenmaggie virtualpatientdesignexploringwhatworksandwhyagroundedtheorystudy
AT samanidipti virtualpatientdesignexploringwhatworksandwhyagroundedtheorystudy
AT kiddjane virtualpatientdesignexploringwhatworksandwhyagroundedtheorystudy
AT daviesdavid virtualpatientdesignexploringwhatworksandwhyagroundedtheorystudy