Cargando…

‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development

PURPOSE: The difficulty of attracting attendance for in-person events is a problem common to all faculty development efforts. Social media holds the potential to disseminate information asynchronously while building a community through quick, easy-to-use formats. The authors sought to document creat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cahn, Peter S., Benjamin, Emelia J., Shanahan, Christopher W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3696127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.20995
_version_ 1782476293705564160
author Cahn, Peter S.
Benjamin, Emelia J.
Shanahan, Christopher W.
author_facet Cahn, Peter S.
Benjamin, Emelia J.
Shanahan, Christopher W.
author_sort Cahn, Peter S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The difficulty of attracting attendance for in-person events is a problem common to all faculty development efforts. Social media holds the potential to disseminate information asynchronously while building a community through quick, easy-to-use formats. The authors sought to document creative uses of social media for faculty development in academic medical centers. METHOD: In December 2011, the first author (P.S.C.) examined the websites of all 154 accredited medical schools in the United States and Canada for pages relevant to faculty development. The most popular social media sites and searched for accounts maintained by faculty developers in academic medicine were also visited. Several months later, in February 2012, a second investigator (C.W.S.) validated these data via an independent review. RESULTS: Twenty-two (22) medical schools (14.3%) employed at least one social media technology in support of faculty development. In total, 40 instances of social media tools were identified – the most popular platforms being Facebook (nine institutions), Twitter (eight institutions), and blogs (eight institutions). Four medical schools, in particular, have developed integrated strategies to engage faculty in online communities. CONCLUSIONS: Although relatively few medical schools have embraced social media to promote faculty development, the present range of such uses demonstrates the flexibility and affordability of the tools. The most popular tools incorporate well into faculty members’ existing use of technology and require minimal additional effort. Additional research into the benefits of engaging faculty through social media may help overcome hesitation to invest in new technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3696127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36961272013-07-01 ‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development Cahn, Peter S. Benjamin, Emelia J. Shanahan, Christopher W. Med Educ Online Trend Article PURPOSE: The difficulty of attracting attendance for in-person events is a problem common to all faculty development efforts. Social media holds the potential to disseminate information asynchronously while building a community through quick, easy-to-use formats. The authors sought to document creative uses of social media for faculty development in academic medical centers. METHOD: In December 2011, the first author (P.S.C.) examined the websites of all 154 accredited medical schools in the United States and Canada for pages relevant to faculty development. The most popular social media sites and searched for accounts maintained by faculty developers in academic medicine were also visited. Several months later, in February 2012, a second investigator (C.W.S.) validated these data via an independent review. RESULTS: Twenty-two (22) medical schools (14.3%) employed at least one social media technology in support of faculty development. In total, 40 instances of social media tools were identified – the most popular platforms being Facebook (nine institutions), Twitter (eight institutions), and blogs (eight institutions). Four medical schools, in particular, have developed integrated strategies to engage faculty in online communities. CONCLUSIONS: Although relatively few medical schools have embraced social media to promote faculty development, the present range of such uses demonstrates the flexibility and affordability of the tools. The most popular tools incorporate well into faculty members’ existing use of technology and require minimal additional effort. Additional research into the benefits of engaging faculty through social media may help overcome hesitation to invest in new technologies. Co-Action Publishing 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3696127/ /pubmed/23810170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.20995 Text en © 2013 Peter S. Cahn et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Trend Article
Cahn, Peter S.
Benjamin, Emelia J.
Shanahan, Christopher W.
‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
title ‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
title_full ‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
title_fullStr ‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
title_full_unstemmed ‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
title_short ‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
title_sort ‘uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
topic Trend Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3696127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.20995
work_keys_str_mv AT cahnpeters uncrunchingtimemedicalschoolsuseofsocialmediaforfacultydevelopment
AT benjaminemeliaj uncrunchingtimemedicalschoolsuseofsocialmediaforfacultydevelopment
AT shanahanchristopherw uncrunchingtimemedicalschoolsuseofsocialmediaforfacultydevelopment