Cargando…

Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Standardized doctor’s orders are replacing traditional order writing in teaching hospitals. The impact of this shift in practice on medical education is unknown. It is possible that preprinted orders interfere with knowledge acquisition and retention by not requiring active decision-maki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Yuna, Mourad, Ophyr, Panisko, Daniel, Sargeant, Robert, Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23842504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-97
_version_ 1782276879214968832
author Lee, Yuna
Mourad, Ophyr
Panisko, Daniel
Sargeant, Robert
Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B
author_facet Lee, Yuna
Mourad, Ophyr
Panisko, Daniel
Sargeant, Robert
Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B
author_sort Lee, Yuna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardized doctor’s orders are replacing traditional order writing in teaching hospitals. The impact of this shift in practice on medical education is unknown. It is possible that preprinted orders interfere with knowledge acquisition and retention by not requiring active decision-making. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of standardized admission orders on disease-specific knowledge among undergraduate medical trainees. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled Year 3 (n = 121) and Year 4 (n = 54) medical students at two academic hospitals in Toronto (Ontario, Canada) during their general internal medicine rotation. We used standardized orders for patient admissions for alcohol withdrawal (AW) and for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) as the intervention and manual order writing as the control. Educational outcomes were assessed through end-of-rotation questionnaires assessing disease-specific knowledge of AW and AECOPD. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Of 175 students, 105 had exposure to patients with alcohol withdrawal during their rotation, and 68 students wrote admission orders. Among these 68 students, 48 used standardized orders (intervention, n = 48) and 20 used manual order writing (control, n = 20). Only 3 students used standardized orders for AECOPD, precluding analysis. There was no significant difference found in mean total score of questionnaires between those who used AW standardized orders and those who did not (11.8 vs. 11.0, p = 0.4). Students who had direct clinical experience had significantly higher mean total scores (11.6 vs. 9.0, p < 0.0001 for AW; 13.8 vs. 12.6, p = 0.02 for AECOPD) compared to students who did not. When corrected for overall knowledge, this difference only persisted for AW. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in total scores between students who used standardized admission orders and traditional manual order writing. Clinical exposure was associated with increase in disease-specific knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3710495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37104952013-07-14 Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study Lee, Yuna Mourad, Ophyr Panisko, Daniel Sargeant, Robert Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Standardized doctor’s orders are replacing traditional order writing in teaching hospitals. The impact of this shift in practice on medical education is unknown. It is possible that preprinted orders interfere with knowledge acquisition and retention by not requiring active decision-making. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of standardized admission orders on disease-specific knowledge among undergraduate medical trainees. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled Year 3 (n = 121) and Year 4 (n = 54) medical students at two academic hospitals in Toronto (Ontario, Canada) during their general internal medicine rotation. We used standardized orders for patient admissions for alcohol withdrawal (AW) and for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) as the intervention and manual order writing as the control. Educational outcomes were assessed through end-of-rotation questionnaires assessing disease-specific knowledge of AW and AECOPD. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Of 175 students, 105 had exposure to patients with alcohol withdrawal during their rotation, and 68 students wrote admission orders. Among these 68 students, 48 used standardized orders (intervention, n = 48) and 20 used manual order writing (control, n = 20). Only 3 students used standardized orders for AECOPD, precluding analysis. There was no significant difference found in mean total score of questionnaires between those who used AW standardized orders and those who did not (11.8 vs. 11.0, p = 0.4). Students who had direct clinical experience had significantly higher mean total scores (11.6 vs. 9.0, p < 0.0001 for AW; 13.8 vs. 12.6, p = 0.02 for AECOPD) compared to students who did not. When corrected for overall knowledge, this difference only persisted for AW. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in total scores between students who used standardized admission orders and traditional manual order writing. Clinical exposure was associated with increase in disease-specific knowledge. BioMed Central 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3710495/ /pubmed/23842504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-97 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Yuna
Mourad, Ophyr
Panisko, Daniel
Sargeant, Robert
Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B
Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
title Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
title_full Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
title_short Evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
title_sort evaluation of standardized doctor's orders as an educational tool for undergraduate medical students: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23842504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-97
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyuna evaluationofstandardizeddoctorsordersasaneducationaltoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mouradophyr evaluationofstandardizeddoctorsordersasaneducationaltoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT paniskodaniel evaluationofstandardizeddoctorsordersasaneducationaltoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sargeantrobert evaluationofstandardizeddoctorsordersasaneducationaltoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT cavalcantirodrigob evaluationofstandardizeddoctorsordersasaneducationaltoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsaprospectivecohortstudy