Cargando…
General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching
Although General Didactics (GD) and Instructional Design (ID) have not shown many points of contact in the past, there are some obvious parellels from the perspective of their historical development. This will be examined in detail in this article. More specifically, we speak about model building, w...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing AG
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-15 |
_version_ | 1782278591665405952 |
---|---|
author | Zierer, Klaus Seel, Norbert M |
author_facet | Zierer, Klaus Seel, Norbert M |
author_sort | Zierer, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although General Didactics (GD) and Instructional Design (ID) have not shown many points of contact in the past, there are some obvious parellels from the perspective of their historical development. This will be examined in detail in this article. More specifically, we speak about model building, which has characterized General Didactics and Instructional Design for some decades. However, the models of General Didactics and Instructional Design are not problem-free with regard to the continuity and advancement of both disciplines. First, we will describe the historical roots of both disciplines and examine which elements of theory are of central importance. Second, we will try to answer the question of which kind of model building could be considered as predominant and what problems result from this predominance. In order to do this, we will describe empirical studies on the use of instructional models and discuss these studies from the perspective of the philosophy of science. Third, we will draw inferences for future processes of model building in order to prevent the same problems that happened in the past from happening again. Finally, we will discuss the issue of what General Didactics can learn from Instructional Design and vice versa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3725874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37258742013-07-30 General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching Zierer, Klaus Seel, Norbert M Springerplus Research Although General Didactics (GD) and Instructional Design (ID) have not shown many points of contact in the past, there are some obvious parellels from the perspective of their historical development. This will be examined in detail in this article. More specifically, we speak about model building, which has characterized General Didactics and Instructional Design for some decades. However, the models of General Didactics and Instructional Design are not problem-free with regard to the continuity and advancement of both disciplines. First, we will describe the historical roots of both disciplines and examine which elements of theory are of central importance. Second, we will try to answer the question of which kind of model building could be considered as predominant and what problems result from this predominance. In order to do this, we will describe empirical studies on the use of instructional models and discuss these studies from the perspective of the philosophy of science. Third, we will draw inferences for future processes of model building in order to prevent the same problems that happened in the past from happening again. Finally, we will discuss the issue of what General Didactics can learn from Instructional Design and vice versa. Springer International Publishing AG 2012-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3725874/ /pubmed/23961346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-15 Text en © Zierer and Seel; licensee Springer. 2012 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Zierer, Klaus Seel, Norbert M General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
title | General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
title_full | General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
title_fullStr | General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
title_full_unstemmed | General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
title_short | General Didactics and Instructional Design: eyes like twins A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
title_sort | general didactics and instructional design: eyes like twins a transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences, about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ziererklaus generaldidacticsandinstructionaldesigneyesliketwinsatransatlanticdialogueaboutsimilaritiesanddifferencesaboutthepastandthefutureoftwosciencesoflearningandteaching AT seelnorbertm generaldidacticsandinstructionaldesigneyesliketwinsatransatlanticdialogueaboutsimilaritiesanddifferencesaboutthepastandthefutureoftwosciencesoflearningandteaching |