Cargando…
Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae
BACKGROUND: The fruit fly Bactrocera oleae is the primary biotic stressor of cultivated olives, causing direct and indirect damages that significantly reduce both the yield and the quality of olive oil. To study the olive-B. oleae interaction, we conducted transcriptomic and proteomic investigations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-86 |
_version_ | 1782279356134981632 |
---|---|
author | Corrado, Giandomenico Alagna, Fiammetta Rocco, Mariapina Renzone, Giovanni Varricchio, Paola Coppola, Valentina Coppola, Mariangela Garonna, Antonio Baldoni, Luciana Scaloni, Andrea Rao, Rosa |
author_facet | Corrado, Giandomenico Alagna, Fiammetta Rocco, Mariapina Renzone, Giovanni Varricchio, Paola Coppola, Valentina Coppola, Mariangela Garonna, Antonio Baldoni, Luciana Scaloni, Andrea Rao, Rosa |
author_sort | Corrado, Giandomenico |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The fruit fly Bactrocera oleae is the primary biotic stressor of cultivated olives, causing direct and indirect damages that significantly reduce both the yield and the quality of olive oil. To study the olive-B. oleae interaction, we conducted transcriptomic and proteomic investigations of the molecular response of the drupe. The identifications of genes and proteins involved in the fruit response were performed using a Suppression Subtractive Hybridisation technique and a combined bi-dimensional electrophoresis/nanoLC-ESI-LIT-MS/MS approach, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 196 ESTs and 26 protein spots as differentially expressed in olives with larval feeding tunnels. A bioinformatic analysis of the identified non-redundant EST and protein collection indicated that different molecular processes were affected, such as stress response, phytohormone signalling, transcriptional control and primary metabolism, and that a considerable proportion of the ESTs could not be classified. The altered expression of 20 transcripts was also analysed by real-time PCR, and the most striking differences were further confirmed in the fruit of a different olive variety. We also cloned the full-length coding sequences of two genes, Oe-chitinase I and Oe-PR27, and showed that these are wound-inducible genes and activated by B. oleae punctures. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first report that reveals the molecular players and signalling pathways involved in the interaction between the olive fruit and its most damaging biotic stressor. Drupe response is complex, involving genes and proteins involved in photosynthesis as well as in the production of ROS, the activation of different stress response pathways and the production of compounds involved in direct defence against phytophagous larvae. Among the latter, trypsin inhibitors should play a major role in drupe resistance reaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3733423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37334232013-08-06 Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae Corrado, Giandomenico Alagna, Fiammetta Rocco, Mariapina Renzone, Giovanni Varricchio, Paola Coppola, Valentina Coppola, Mariangela Garonna, Antonio Baldoni, Luciana Scaloni, Andrea Rao, Rosa BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The fruit fly Bactrocera oleae is the primary biotic stressor of cultivated olives, causing direct and indirect damages that significantly reduce both the yield and the quality of olive oil. To study the olive-B. oleae interaction, we conducted transcriptomic and proteomic investigations of the molecular response of the drupe. The identifications of genes and proteins involved in the fruit response were performed using a Suppression Subtractive Hybridisation technique and a combined bi-dimensional electrophoresis/nanoLC-ESI-LIT-MS/MS approach, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 196 ESTs and 26 protein spots as differentially expressed in olives with larval feeding tunnels. A bioinformatic analysis of the identified non-redundant EST and protein collection indicated that different molecular processes were affected, such as stress response, phytohormone signalling, transcriptional control and primary metabolism, and that a considerable proportion of the ESTs could not be classified. The altered expression of 20 transcripts was also analysed by real-time PCR, and the most striking differences were further confirmed in the fruit of a different olive variety. We also cloned the full-length coding sequences of two genes, Oe-chitinase I and Oe-PR27, and showed that these are wound-inducible genes and activated by B. oleae punctures. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first report that reveals the molecular players and signalling pathways involved in the interaction between the olive fruit and its most damaging biotic stressor. Drupe response is complex, involving genes and proteins involved in photosynthesis as well as in the production of ROS, the activation of different stress response pathways and the production of compounds involved in direct defence against phytophagous larvae. Among the latter, trypsin inhibitors should play a major role in drupe resistance reaction. BioMed Central 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3733423/ /pubmed/22694925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-86 Text en Copyright © 2012 Corrado et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Corrado, Giandomenico Alagna, Fiammetta Rocco, Mariapina Renzone, Giovanni Varricchio, Paola Coppola, Valentina Coppola, Mariangela Garonna, Antonio Baldoni, Luciana Scaloni, Andrea Rao, Rosa Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae |
title | Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae |
title_full | Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae |
title_fullStr | Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae |
title_short | Molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly Bactrocera oleae |
title_sort | molecular interactions between the olive and the fruit fly bactrocera oleae |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-86 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corradogiandomenico molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT alagnafiammetta molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT roccomariapina molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT renzonegiovanni molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT varricchiopaola molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT coppolavalentina molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT coppolamariangela molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT garonnaantonio molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT baldoniluciana molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT scaloniandrea molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae AT raorosa molecularinteractionsbetweentheoliveandthefruitflybactroceraoleae |