Cargando…

The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success

Humans differ in their ability to learn how to control their own brain activity by neurofeedback. However, neural mechanisms underlying these inter-individual differences, which may determine training success and associated cognitive enhancement, are not well-understood. Here, it is asked whether ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie, Huster, René J., Scharfenort, Robert, Mokom, Zacharais N., Vosskuhl, Johannes, Figge, Christian, Zimmermann, Jörg, Herrmann, Christoph S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3739027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23950741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00453
_version_ 1782476921657884672
author Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie
Huster, René J.
Scharfenort, Robert
Mokom, Zacharais N.
Vosskuhl, Johannes
Figge, Christian
Zimmermann, Jörg
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_facet Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie
Huster, René J.
Scharfenort, Robert
Mokom, Zacharais N.
Vosskuhl, Johannes
Figge, Christian
Zimmermann, Jörg
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_sort Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description Humans differ in their ability to learn how to control their own brain activity by neurofeedback. However, neural mechanisms underlying these inter-individual differences, which may determine training success and associated cognitive enhancement, are not well-understood. Here, it is asked whether neurofeedback success of frontal-midline (fm) theta, an oscillation related to higher cognitive functions, could be predicted by the morphology of brain structures known to be critically involved in fm-theta generation. Nineteen young, right-handed participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of T1-weighted brain images, and took part in an individualized, eight-session neurofeedback training in order to learn how to enhance activity in their fm-theta frequency band. Initial training success, measured at the second training session, was correlated with the final outcome measure. We found that the inferior, superior, and middle frontal cortices were not associated with training success. However, volume of the midcingulate cortex as well as volume and concentration of the underlying white matter structures act as predictor variables for the general responsiveness to training. These findings suggest a neuroanatomical foundation for the ability to learn to control one's own brain activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3739027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37390272013-08-15 The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie Huster, René J. Scharfenort, Robert Mokom, Zacharais N. Vosskuhl, Johannes Figge, Christian Zimmermann, Jörg Herrmann, Christoph S. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Humans differ in their ability to learn how to control their own brain activity by neurofeedback. However, neural mechanisms underlying these inter-individual differences, which may determine training success and associated cognitive enhancement, are not well-understood. Here, it is asked whether neurofeedback success of frontal-midline (fm) theta, an oscillation related to higher cognitive functions, could be predicted by the morphology of brain structures known to be critically involved in fm-theta generation. Nineteen young, right-handed participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of T1-weighted brain images, and took part in an individualized, eight-session neurofeedback training in order to learn how to enhance activity in their fm-theta frequency band. Initial training success, measured at the second training session, was correlated with the final outcome measure. We found that the inferior, superior, and middle frontal cortices were not associated with training success. However, volume of the midcingulate cortex as well as volume and concentration of the underlying white matter structures act as predictor variables for the general responsiveness to training. These findings suggest a neuroanatomical foundation for the ability to learn to control one's own brain activity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3739027/ /pubmed/23950741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00453 Text en Copyright © 2013 Enriquez-Geppert, Huster, Scharfenort, Mokom, Vosskuhl, Figge, Zimmermann and Herrmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie
Huster, René J.
Scharfenort, Robert
Mokom, Zacharais N.
Vosskuhl, Johannes
Figge, Christian
Zimmermann, Jörg
Herrmann, Christoph S.
The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
title The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
title_full The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
title_fullStr The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
title_full_unstemmed The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
title_short The morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
title_sort morphology of midcingulate cortex predicts frontal-midline theta neurofeedback success
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3739027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23950741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00453
work_keys_str_mv AT enriquezgeppertstefanie themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT husterrenej themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT scharfenortrobert themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT mokomzacharaisn themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT vosskuhljohannes themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT figgechristian themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT zimmermannjorg themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT herrmannchristophs themorphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT enriquezgeppertstefanie morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT husterrenej morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT scharfenortrobert morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT mokomzacharaisn morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT vosskuhljohannes morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT figgechristian morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT zimmermannjorg morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess
AT herrmannchristophs morphologyofmidcingulatecortexpredictsfrontalmidlinethetaneurofeedbacksuccess