Cargando…
Variability in Exposure of Epitope G40-R43 of Domain I in Commercial Anti-Beta2-Glycoprotein I IgG ELISAs
BACKGROUND: A major problem for diagnosing the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the high variability between commercial anti-β(2)glycoprotein I (β(2)GPI) assays. Predominantly antibodies reactive against cryptic epitope Glycine40-Arginine43 (G40-R43) in domain I are associated with an increased ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071402 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: A major problem for diagnosing the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the high variability between commercial anti-β(2)glycoprotein I (β(2)GPI) assays. Predominantly antibodies reactive against cryptic epitope Glycine40-Arginine43 (G40-R43) in domain I are associated with an increased risk for thrombosis. Upon interaction with anionic surfaces β(2)GPI opens up, thereby exposing G40-R43. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether suboptimal exposure of epitope G40-R43 explains the variations in results observed between commercial assays. METHODS: Two patient-derived monoclonal antibodies were tested on neutral versus anionic plates. Antibody P1-117 reacts with G40-R43 in the open conformation while P2-6 recognizes β(2)GPI irrespective of its conformation. These antibodies were tested in commercial anti-β(2)GPI assays (A–E). RESULTS: In assay A, both antibodies showed equal reactivity towards β(2)GPI, indicating that all the β(2)GPI exposes G40-R43. In other assays P1-117 displayed lower reactivity than P2-6, demonstrating reduced G40-R43 availability. To exclude influences of other assay features, reactivity was re-examined on plates of assay A and B using the protocol/reagents from each assay. In all combinations, reactivity of both antibodies on a plate was comparable to results obtained with its own protocol/reagents, suggesting that the coating, rather than other assay components, accounts for the observed differences. In two patient cohorts we demonstrated that a number of domain I-reactive samples are missed in assays characterized by a decreased exposure of epitope G40-R43. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure of epitope G40-R43 on β(2)GPI is highly variable between commercial anti-β(2)GPI assays. As a consequence, patients can be falsely assigned negative in assays characterized by a reduced exposure of G40-R43. |
---|