Cargando…
Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23912957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1 |
_version_ | 1782280435015876608 |
---|---|
author | Groenendijk, Floris H. Zwart, Wilbert Floore, Arno Akbari, Stephanie Bernards, Rene |
author_facet | Groenendijk, Floris H. Zwart, Wilbert Floore, Arno Akbari, Stephanie Bernards, Rene |
author_sort | Groenendijk, Floris H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We analyzed a series of 2,658 ERα-positive HER2-negative breast tumors for ERα and progesterone receptor (PR) status as determined by mRNA expression and for their molecular subtypes (Luminal type vs Basal type, assessed by BluePrint™ molecular subtyping assay). In addition, we assessed the recurrence risk (low vs high) using the 70-gene MammaPrint™ signature. We found that 55 out of 2,658 (2.1 %) tumors that are ERα positive by mRNA analysis also demonstrate a Basal molecular subtype, indicating that they lack expression of estrogen-responsive genes. These ERα-positive Basal-type tumors express significantly lower levels of both ERα and PR mRNA as compared to Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001) and almost invariably (94.5 %) have a high-risk MammaPrint™ profile. Twelve of the MammaPrint™ genes are directly ERα responsive, indicating that MammaPrint™ assesses ERα function in breast cancer without considering ERα mRNA levels. We find a relatively high expression of the dominant negative ERα splice variant ERΔ7 in ERα-positive Basal-type tumors as compared to ERα-positive Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001). Expression of the dominant negative ERα variant ERΔ7 provides a rationale as to why tumors are of the Basal molecular subtype while staining ERα positive by immunohistochemistry. These tumors may lack a functional response to estrogen and consequently may not respond to hormonal therapy. Our data indicate that such patients are of MammaPrint™ high recurrence risk and might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3742961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37429612013-08-14 Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics Groenendijk, Floris H. Zwart, Wilbert Floore, Arno Akbari, Stephanie Bernards, Rene Breast Cancer Res Treat Preclinical Study It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We analyzed a series of 2,658 ERα-positive HER2-negative breast tumors for ERα and progesterone receptor (PR) status as determined by mRNA expression and for their molecular subtypes (Luminal type vs Basal type, assessed by BluePrint™ molecular subtyping assay). In addition, we assessed the recurrence risk (low vs high) using the 70-gene MammaPrint™ signature. We found that 55 out of 2,658 (2.1 %) tumors that are ERα positive by mRNA analysis also demonstrate a Basal molecular subtype, indicating that they lack expression of estrogen-responsive genes. These ERα-positive Basal-type tumors express significantly lower levels of both ERα and PR mRNA as compared to Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001) and almost invariably (94.5 %) have a high-risk MammaPrint™ profile. Twelve of the MammaPrint™ genes are directly ERα responsive, indicating that MammaPrint™ assesses ERα function in breast cancer without considering ERα mRNA levels. We find a relatively high expression of the dominant negative ERα splice variant ERΔ7 in ERα-positive Basal-type tumors as compared to ERα-positive Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001). Expression of the dominant negative ERα variant ERΔ7 provides a rationale as to why tumors are of the Basal molecular subtype while staining ERα positive by immunohistochemistry. These tumors may lack a functional response to estrogen and consequently may not respond to hormonal therapy. Our data indicate that such patients are of MammaPrint™ high recurrence risk and might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2013-08-04 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3742961/ /pubmed/23912957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Preclinical Study Groenendijk, Floris H. Zwart, Wilbert Floore, Arno Akbari, Stephanie Bernards, Rene Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
title | Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
title_full | Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
title_fullStr | Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
title_full_unstemmed | Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
title_short | Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
title_sort | estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics |
topic | Preclinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23912957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groenendijkflorish estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics AT zwartwilbert estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics AT floorearno estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics AT akbaristephanie estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics AT bernardsrene estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics |