Cargando…

Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics

It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groenendijk, Floris H., Zwart, Wilbert, Floore, Arno, Akbari, Stephanie, Bernards, Rene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23912957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1
_version_ 1782280435015876608
author Groenendijk, Floris H.
Zwart, Wilbert
Floore, Arno
Akbari, Stephanie
Bernards, Rene
author_facet Groenendijk, Floris H.
Zwart, Wilbert
Floore, Arno
Akbari, Stephanie
Bernards, Rene
author_sort Groenendijk, Floris H.
collection PubMed
description It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We analyzed a series of 2,658 ERα-positive HER2-negative breast tumors for ERα and progesterone receptor (PR) status as determined by mRNA expression and for their molecular subtypes (Luminal type vs Basal type, assessed by BluePrint™ molecular subtyping assay). In addition, we assessed the recurrence risk (low vs high) using the 70-gene MammaPrint™ signature. We found that 55 out of 2,658 (2.1 %) tumors that are ERα positive by mRNA analysis also demonstrate a Basal molecular subtype, indicating that they lack expression of estrogen-responsive genes. These ERα-positive Basal-type tumors express significantly lower levels of both ERα and PR mRNA as compared to Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001) and almost invariably (94.5 %) have a high-risk MammaPrint™ profile. Twelve of the MammaPrint™ genes are directly ERα responsive, indicating that MammaPrint™ assesses ERα function in breast cancer without considering ERα mRNA levels. We find a relatively high expression of the dominant negative ERα splice variant ERΔ7 in ERα-positive Basal-type tumors as compared to ERα-positive Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001). Expression of the dominant negative ERα variant ERΔ7 provides a rationale as to why tumors are of the Basal molecular subtype while staining ERα positive by immunohistochemistry. These tumors may lack a functional response to estrogen and consequently may not respond to hormonal therapy. Our data indicate that such patients are of MammaPrint™ high recurrence risk and might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3742961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37429612013-08-14 Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics Groenendijk, Floris H. Zwart, Wilbert Floore, Arno Akbari, Stephanie Bernards, Rene Breast Cancer Res Treat Preclinical Study It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We analyzed a series of 2,658 ERα-positive HER2-negative breast tumors for ERα and progesterone receptor (PR) status as determined by mRNA expression and for their molecular subtypes (Luminal type vs Basal type, assessed by BluePrint™ molecular subtyping assay). In addition, we assessed the recurrence risk (low vs high) using the 70-gene MammaPrint™ signature. We found that 55 out of 2,658 (2.1 %) tumors that are ERα positive by mRNA analysis also demonstrate a Basal molecular subtype, indicating that they lack expression of estrogen-responsive genes. These ERα-positive Basal-type tumors express significantly lower levels of both ERα and PR mRNA as compared to Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001) and almost invariably (94.5 %) have a high-risk MammaPrint™ profile. Twelve of the MammaPrint™ genes are directly ERα responsive, indicating that MammaPrint™ assesses ERα function in breast cancer without considering ERα mRNA levels. We find a relatively high expression of the dominant negative ERα splice variant ERΔ7 in ERα-positive Basal-type tumors as compared to ERα-positive Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001). Expression of the dominant negative ERα variant ERΔ7 provides a rationale as to why tumors are of the Basal molecular subtype while staining ERα positive by immunohistochemistry. These tumors may lack a functional response to estrogen and consequently may not respond to hormonal therapy. Our data indicate that such patients are of MammaPrint™ high recurrence risk and might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2013-08-04 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3742961/ /pubmed/23912957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Preclinical Study
Groenendijk, Floris H.
Zwart, Wilbert
Floore, Arno
Akbari, Stephanie
Bernards, Rene
Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
title Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
title_full Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
title_fullStr Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
title_short Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
title_sort estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics
topic Preclinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23912957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2648-1
work_keys_str_mv AT groenendijkflorish estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics
AT zwartwilbert estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics
AT floorearno estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics
AT akbaristephanie estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics
AT bernardsrene estrogenreceptorsplicevariantsasapotentialsourceoffalsepositiveestrogenreceptorstatusinbreastcancerdiagnostics